Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Rousseau theory of education

Powerful Essays
1497 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Rousseau theory of education
Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s Theory of Education:
Natural Education

Darny Mao
November 10, 2014
Introduction to Philosophy
Providence College
Professor Nichols
Jean-Jacques Rousseau was a revolutionary French philosopher who in addition held his position in society as an eloquent writer of the Enlightenment Age. Much of Rousseau’s thoughts and theories illuminated through his writings, and his works reflected his disdain for contemporary society in which he assured to undermine the freedom of men. At a young age, Rousseau attended a school in the rural village of Bossey where he acquired the love for nature. However, Rousseau ended his period of formal education when the school punished him for a boyish offense. It was in Bossey, Rousseau claimed to have evolved his theory that emphasized on the significance of sensibility to nature as the course to achieve freedom. Rousseau believed that discipline, restraint of impulses,and departure from nature caused humanity to be corrupted by civilization (Monteiro).
According to Rousseau, eighteenth-century conventional education was hierarchical and authoritative, and it functioned to disrupt the connection between human and nature. Educators dictated learning and suppressed students’ freedom of expression and will with regulations and disciplines; this systematic practice educated the nature out of children and violated their natural self preservation. Children became insensible to their natural selves because their learning and development were structured by the standpoints of adults. Society cultivated education to civilize and socialize children into “good citizens” with predictable and acceptable forms of behavior that fit the societal standards of orderly conduct and manner (Peckover). Nonetheless, children’s decisions and judgements became dependent upon the judgements of others because the education system hindered free thinking individuals which subsequently led to the corruption of young minds (Monteiro).Discussions on philosophical obtainment of freedom ushered Rousseau to speak upon educational reforms in society by issuing his own theory on education.
In his work Emile, Rousseau outlined his philosophical theory on education from infancy to adulthood. In the book, Rousseau is the private tutor to his fictitious pupil Emile. Contrary to intellectual education, Rousseau introduces natural education in which focuses upon cultivating the development of children with regards to their natural instincts and behaviors as humans in order to preserve natural goodness and retain freedom. Moreover, Rousseau asserts the proper learning environment should be in the suburbs because it minimizes the hindrance of societal influence (Peckover). With the proposition of a naturalistic education, Rousseau emphasizes upon the understanding of various stages of life and the development of different forms of individualized education that appropriately suit each life stage; this is Rousseau’s guiding principle that directs his teaching method established him Emile.
Children are not little adults that should conform to societal customs.They are innocent and vulnerable and must be entitled to freedom and happiness (Infed). Rousseau raises the notion of liberating Emile, like all children, from an early age. During infancy, a newborn should be free and naked; the child should not be swaddled because swaddling is an unnatural custom that causes discomfort and restricts the baby from stretching and moving its limbs. Rousseau emphasizes that movement allows an infant to know the extension of the environment and foster the child senses and experiences (Emile 15-16). The infant must be raised as natural as possible; thus, the instinctual practices such as breastfeeding must also be implemented.
As Emile transitions into a toddler, he develops an understanding and practice of liberty. Rousseau proposes parents should “accustom the child to depend on circumstances ...[and] not give him anything because he asks for it, but because he needs it. When he acts, do not let him know that it is from obedience: and when another acts for him, let him not feel that he is exercising authority” (Emile 45). The maxim teaches him to confine his wishes within the limits of his power,so he will scarcely feel the want of anything not in his power (Infed). Emile will understand that he does not exert power over people and he does not follow the authority of anyone because everything he does or is given him will be from necessity and liberty. Moreover, Rousseau asserts, “ do not give your pupil any sort of lesson verbally: he ought to receive none except from experience... for he does not know what being in fault means ” (Emile 56). The toddler must begin to learn from his experiences and become his own master and follow the dictates of his own will. This will preserve natural goodness and freedom at this stage of life.
Furthermore, from the ages of five to twelve, the child must be governed by purely negative education where the mind is to be undisturbed until its faculties have developed before actual knowledge and instructional education are directed into the child are subjected. The mind of the child within this current stage has no capacity to memorize lessons,learn things or use reason because the Rousseau assures the brain cannot retain the ideas( Emile 78). This proposed education does not teach virtues or truths, but it protects from vice and error to the premature mind. This natural stage constitutes to the focus on developing the physical qualities and strengthening senses of the child with activities that concerns with the practicalities of life such as playing sports and agricultural employment which strengthens the body and health.These activities will lead Emile to count, measure, learn to observe and to draw up observations that concern with the necessity to the natural self. At this point, the child does not have any real sense of duty, but Rousseau believes this path will lead him to truth and goodness when he reaches the age of reason to understand and recognize it (Montiero).
The age of reason emerges between the ages of twelve and fifteen when the mind’s faculties are fully developed and where the strength of the youth augments external needs because now the child possesses the urge for activity in the mental form and his attention has a greater capacity to be sustained (Infed). This strength is not only fostered by puberty, but from movement,physical experiences and emotions. Reason becomes awake in order to furnish guidance, for which is the function of rational life. His reasons will enable him to deal with what he sees as dangerous emotions of adolescence, and with moral issues religion in terms of the natural religion of the human heart (Infed). Concurrently, his reason will constitute the beginning of instructional education and to foster creativity and curiosity. The curriculum for Emile will first comprise of studies that can be taught through nature and from there it will the study will expand. Rousseau will also Emile in situations in order to cultivate Emile’s thinking self to achieve conclusions and judgement. (Monteiro) Rousseau asserts that a child who has been educated by Nature will be self reliant and use reason to guide his action. The child will allow his mind and body to work together to enhance his understanding of his world. Through natural form of education , the child will develop his own ideas and be govern by his own will, not the will of others. (Peckover) The true work of education is the inner emergence, growth, exercise and the integration of feelings, sentiments and the passion. It is things that philosophy art, morality and duty dawns when the Emile steps into society and begin to understand relations with other man. However he will remain incorrupt for he will already know what it right to his nature.
Some may argue that such education practice is impractical and and to an extent inapplicable within American’s educational system in the twenty first century because of the fast paced lifestyle of many Americans and the current challenges within the system such as achievement gaps in urban communities. It is nearly impossible for a students to all receive an education in the surban when most of the UNited States is urbanization. Also with the current values and expectations of families and communities, students can not afford to start receiving an education late. Although the strategies of Rousseau may present futility, however the ideologies of the natural education can be intertwined in the education realm and pedagogy of teachers. In Emile, Rousseau explicates upon having a specific education methods with accordance to the stages of development and that it is individual to fit the specifc needs of the child. This idea can translate to a student center learning method that the educator can promote where educators can target students become succeed by focusing and trageting teh differnt styles of learning of students . SImilar to the differnt stages of lifes there are different types of learners without age groups. so education can be a natural process. This way the educator will have control of the established learning environement. It is through allowing teh natural tendencies and forces to have their way, that the process becomes enjoyable and rational The teacher will draw up a lesson that will target students who are

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Rousseau depicts man in his natural state as innocent and good, blaming the invention of property as the root of societal inequalities and lamenting the sacrifice of liberty required of members of a state. Rousseau's early man is deemed non-confrontational, concerned only with 'self-preservation'…

    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jean-Jacques Rousseau, who lived from 1712 to 1778, was a man of many things. Rousseau was a composer, philosopher, and a writer in the 18th century. His political philosophy influenced the Enlightenment in France and across Europe, as well as aspects of the French Revolution and the overall development of modern political thought. Rousseau's also had ideas about education.…

    • 192 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    All of these authors share some similar points, but the majority spoken is disagreement. I would expect this when there are men and women speaking their views during enlightenment. Of course, the men see women as objects to look good for them while requiring no education or the ability to reason.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    According to Rousseau, there are some good things in civilization but there are negatives that come with it. This correlates to his famed quote “A man is born free, and everywhere he is in chains”. This can be interpreted as people are born free, but they are chained by the societies that they live in. People believe they live above society’s standards but it is society themselves who reminds people that you always seek approval from them and always conform to their beliefs, therefore it makes us a slave to societies standards. Even the people who enforce society’s standards and think they are the perfect example for society also show that they are a bigger slave than to those who are trying to seek the approval of society. Rousseau's main argument is that the main cause for all of human nature's problem is not 'sin' but separation from 'Nature.' He believed that Nature has always been kind to man and only when he separates himself from Nature that he degenerates both physically and morally. This is in direct contrast to Hobbes' views that man is fundamentally…

    • 1774 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jean-Jacques Rousseau was probably one of the most accomplished writers of the Age of Enlightenment, but his writing gives only a glimpse of his…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Man is no longer himself rather he has conformed to society which he has described as a powerful and restrictive system. Rousseau believes that is man would have never gained knowledge from the arts and sciences, then they would not have the false values and motives or behave in such barbaric ways. He especially focuses on the idea of politeness. He claims that this is merely a societal norm because behind it, people are actually just lying frauds and that arts and science is to blame because it has corrupted out minds. He positively correlates the knowledge of the arts and sciences with the corruption of…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Was Rousseau a Philosophe?

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Was Rousseau a philosophe? According to the Wikipedia definition of a philosophe, “philosophes were a new approach to learning that encouraged reason, knowledge and education as a way of overcoming superstition and ignorance.” 1 The underlying goal of a philosophe was the concept of progress. Through the mastery and explanation of the sciences, humanity could learn to harness the natural world for its own benefit in order to live peacefully with one another. Rousseau’s ‘Second Discourse’ does exactly that: It is an incredible re-creation of the concept of how man existed in a perfect state and ultimately led themselves towards voluntary enslavement. I believe it was Rousseau’s purpose to make the world understand the transformation that had occurred in an attempt to get humanity to revert back to a level of equality and co-existence that had once occurred naturally.…

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Homework

    • 882 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Jean-Jacques Rousseau of France believed that in the state of nature, people would get along and work with each other. However, Rousseau thought that by interacting with each other, people would eventually become corrupt and…

    • 882 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Rousseau man should want to live in the natural state. Nithin Coca is a journalist who writes from Colombia University discusses Rousseau’s ideas about the Natural State by saying, “Man in his natural state had more equality and freedom from…

    • 3155 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Rousseau came to the conclusion that the best way to examine the inequality in society is to examine the beginning of mankind itself. He tried to imagine the early state of man assuming there was ever actually a state where man existed only with the nature, in a solitary, and primitive lifestyle. He did not however revert as far back to the idea of the Neanderthal man to examine the ideas man held and where they came from. Instead, he looked at a state where man looked, and seemed to have the same physical abilities as he does today. Rousseau also concedes that a time where the ideas of government, ownership, justice, and injustice did not exist may not have ever existed. If what many religions tell us is true, then, in mans beginning, he was from the start, handed down laws from god which would influence his thinking and decisions. Through this, the only way such a period could come about would have to be through some catastrophic event, which would not only be impossible to explain, but consequently, impossible to prove. Therefore, imagining this state could prove not only embarrassing, but would be a contradiction to the Holy Scriptures.…

    • 1459 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this primitive state, people were happy and there were no awas, no judges; all people were equal. Rousseau suggested that the earliest humans possessed a basic drive for self-preservation, and compassion and pity. Unlike animals, Rousseau illustrated that humans had free will and the potential for perfectibility. People came together, formed families, and this led to developments in agriculture, metallurgy, private property, and the division of labor, which created inequality. Neighbours began to compare their abilities and achievements with one another, and this furthered a divide. Ultimately, the work proclaims that by nature, humans are essentially peaceful, content, and equal, and that they had lost their liberty due to the…

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rousseau begins by discussing his view of primitive man, whose existence is defined by a state of nature prior to the development of civil society: primitive man would have simple needs, would display a natural instinct for his own self-preservation, as well as a natural aversion toward the suffering of other men and creatures (ibid, 154). In Rousseau's view, primitive man does not associate with others, is motivated by sheer instinct, and the natural…

    • 1534 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rousseau's Argument

    • 199 Words
    • 1 Page

    As a believer in the plasticity of human nature, Rousseau holds that good laws make for good citizens. However, he also believes people consist society for keeping a peace when individuals cannot keep a peace because of their own situations.…

    • 199 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rousseau deeply believed that humans are innately good and innocent and that life experiences and society cause their corruption, thus the Social Contract was formed in April 1762. This contract states that in order stop society’s corruption, one must be good and have good intentions towards others. In other words, he believed that if society were to vanish, people would be pure and happy once again ( ). He affected the government by setting boundaries between the government and citizens and became a foundation for sovereignty. He wanted liberty and equality. Another idea from Rousseau was to get as close as possible to nature. Nature would bring people happiness. This could be interpreted in many ways. Rousseau was just interested in people being more natural and true. His views about society coincide with the beliefs of Voltaire.…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rousseau states that Hobbes and Locke mischaracterize the state of nature, since man is not motivated by greed, envy or material things in a true state of nature. From Rousseau point of view man would be motivated by love to the self and self preservation. Rousseau expresses how animals does not have a need for material things and they life in a state of nature.…

    • 65 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays