Firstly, Romeo and Juliet, being a play about romance, has passion very much abundant in the play. For this essay, passion would mean being led by one’s emotions and just reacting without thinking, not understanding the consequences of one’s actions and the situation one is in, referring to being ruled by the heart. As for reason, it would mean being able to be logical and analyse the current situation, understanding both sides of the issue and considering the consequences before acting, referring to being ruled by the mind.
Through these definitions, I think that the statement is largely true, as we see that the characters tend to be driven by their passion and emotions rather than reason and logic. This can be seen throughout the play, through the character’s examples and actions.
Firstly, we can see how passion overrules reason in Romeo’s decision to go to the Capulet ball. Being a Montague, going to the Capulet ball could mean death if found out, and holds a quality of danger to it. Despite Romeo stating that his mind “misgives some consequence,” and that there will be an “untimely death”, he still decides to go to the ball in order to see Rosaline, who will be at the ball. We see that this clearly shows how Romeo allows his emotions to lead him, ignoring the more logical side of himself. Romeo chooses to see Rosaline, despite there being many dangers involved and already having misgivings as to going to the ball, but he still persists to look at Rosaline.
Secondly, another example in the play as to how man tends to be driven more by passion than by reason is in Juliet’s proposal of marriage and Friar Lawrence’s agreement to wed the couple.
At the start of Act Two, Scene Two, we see Juliet choosing reason over passion, being practical by considering their love for each other. She tries to reason out that a Montague “is nor hand nor foot, nor...