Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Rome and China Dbq

Good Essays
739 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Rome and China Dbq
While both the Roman and Han empires were very successful, they went through very different obstacles in accomplishing what they did. The two empires were located in very different geographic settings providing them with different challenges. The geographic factors of Europe helped the economic development of the Roman Empire while the geographic factors in China mostly hindered the economic development of the Han empire. One geographic factor that allows for easy access to trade and leads to economic prosperity is being near a large water source. A water source can permit one group of people to be able to come into contact with a different group of people more easily. By being able to interact with different groups of people, you can trade with them, conquer them, and learn different skills from them. The Roman Empire was situated by many larger sources of water. Very central to them was the Mediterranean Sea, and they also had contact with the Black Sea, North Sea, and Atlantic Ocean (Doc. 1). This allowed them to be able to travel by water to many different lands and interact with many different peoples. By doing this, they were able to advance economic and really improve the economic development of the Roman empire. The Han dynasty did not have access to as many water sources as the Roman Empire did. While the Romans had a very central water source (the Mediterranean) to connect them with many different groups of people, the Han dynasty had water on their coast that didn’t connect them with other lands and had a few main rivers running through it that weren’t connected (Doc. 5). Because the Han dynasty didn’t have a large water source to connect them with other people, it was harder for them to learn new skills and trade with other people that would benefit them economically therefore that geographic factor hindered the Han’s economic development. The few main rivers in China weren’t connected, and this hurt the Han militarily and commercially. Qin emperor Shi Huangdi ordered the building of the Magic Canal to connect the two rivers but this was a very difficult task because of geographic factors (Doc. 4). The rivers ran in opposite directions and were three miles apart at their closest. Other canals were also built in different areas. Once the canals were made, it allowed for the transport of goods throughout different parts of the Han dynasty and also allowed for military conquest to expand the Han dynasty. This geographic factor hindered the economic development of the Han dynasty. While the Han had difficulty engineering waterways due to lack of water, the Roman Empire had an abundance of water and because of the environment were able to easily engineer the water. Different elevations, surplus of water, and gravity all allowed for the manufacturing of aqueducts (Doc. 4). The way that Roman cities were built, the aqueducts were able to channel water from high ground many miles away to cities (Doc. 3). Due to the geography of the Roman Empire these aqueducts were possible. With these aqueducts the Romans were able to more quickly advance and not spend as much time obtaining fresh waters for cities which led to greater economic development. While a lot of geographic factors hindered the economic development of the Han dynasty, some geographic factors benefited economic growth. The diversity of the land in China allowed for many different resources. As shown in the rubbing of a salt mine, there was saltwater/brine deposits available in China underground and mountains that provided good areas for hunting (Doc. 6). Salt was a very valuable resource in the Han dynasty and was available to the Han’s because of their geographic location. The same is true for hunting, because this was available due to their geographic location and access to salt and good hunting led to positive economic development for the Han dynasty because they could be used for trade. An additional document to compare the geographic factors that affected economic development in the Roman and Han empires would be a comparison of how successful economically the two empires were side by side, because this would show whether or not the geographic factors really had a huge impact on their economic development or not. Overall though, I think that the geographic factors of the Han dynasty hindered their economic development while the geographic factors of the Roman Empire helped their economic development.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Technology is the building block of any society: it allows for new advancements to be made that improve daily life. Two such societies that made advancements in technology included the Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire. As the expansion of the empire increased, the Romans built roads that linked these regions together. These roads were built in such a way that allowed for easier travel: roads were paved and allowed for water to run off. In addition, the empire also developed the transportation of water throughout the city through the construction of aqueducts, which were canals. Likewise, the Han Dynasty made advancements in the distribution of water: there were water ways, canals, and pools that were inspected by hydraulic engineers. Water was also used to power a blowing-engine. Because of the advancements that were made, the Han Dynasty is regarded by historians as the “Golden Age.” Similarly, the Romans created a large empire that stretched from Europe to the Middle East. Because of the vastness of both empires, water and technology were heavily relied upon, yet unlike the Han officials, the upper-class Romans had a negative attitude towards technology.…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    First, ancient Rome and Han China both shared social views. Male dominance was a big thing for both, as they only cared to produce male offspring and didn't really care much about the women. In Han China it was a bit of a disgrace to produce women offspring; in Rome women were in the same social level as all of the children, everybody under seven-teen years of age. Even-though they both had sort of a sexism society, their paterfamilias were very loyal and respectful. Rome had a lot more slaves then Han China, however they led to an economical downfall in both ancient Rome and Han China.…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imperial Rome and Han China had some similarities and differences in their foundation. In the eight century B.C.E., Rome began as a small city-state on the western side of Italy. Originally they were a monarchy but in 509 B.C.E. they knocked off the monarchy and made themselves republic. In their republic system, the wealthy class, known as patricians, dominated. The lower class was called plebeians. The Romans had laws that protected the lower class form abuse. The Romans took great pride in their system, believing it gave them more freedom. With this political system, the Romans launched their empire, a process that took more than 500 years. The Chinese were not building a new empire yet they were restoring the old. The Chinese empire started as early as 2200 B.C.E. By 5oo B.C.E. the Chinese state was in shambles which they considered as the warring states, which were seven kingdoms within the Chinese government fighting against each other. China finally reunified in 221 B.C.E. Han China and Imperial Rome are similar because they both flourished at about the same time (200 B.C.E. – 200 C.E.), conquered about the same amount of land (about 1.5 million square miles), and had about the same population (50 to 60 million). The reason for the similarities and differences in the foundation in both of the empires was because Rome was a new empire while the Han dynasty was just restoring the old but they were still the dame due to their similarity in the time era both empires flourished, they occupied a similar area, and they contained a similar population.…

    • 644 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the classical period, many civilizations and large land bases were formed. Of these many civilizations, two main ones were Han China and Imperial Rome. Although Han China and Imperial Rome both had similar government structures and trading systems, they both had two very different militaries.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    China And Rome Dbq Essay

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Though both the Chinese and Roman Empires were huge, wealthy, and powerful, they both had tragic falls. China was destroyed by nomadic invaders, a lack of army, and the influence of Buddhism. Rome, on the other hand was ruined by attacks by other civilizations, the loss of productive members of society, and the influence of Christianity. Both empires suffered from similar ideas, such as religion, or a lack of military, but each idea impacted them in different ways. Though the Chinese and Roman Empire were truly remarkable, like many other ancient empires, they had a devastating…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Han dynasty was the most influential dynasty in Chinese history and led to china becoming a country as we know it today. They extended Chinese rule from southern Mongolia to northern Vietnam and as far west as Nepal. One of the main reason for the prosperity and solidity of the Han dynasty was the relationship between the imperial family and the elite. Each group supported each other economically as well as socially, leading to a stable and prosperous empire.…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Han China during the time 200 bce. through 200 ce. and Imperial Rome during the time of 31 bce. though 476 ce. had many similarities and differences. Some of the similarities between the two are their religious policies, the significance of their armies, rebelliations from the people, and the role of the emperor. These empires had many differences as well such as the acceptance of outsiders, their influences on other regions, and their philosophies.…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Han and Roman Empire

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Both civilizations had very strong central governments which allowed for powerful and expanding kingdoms. Both empires had to develop road systems for their expanding military. The Roman army men were experienced and privileged and held high ranks in their class system and played an important role, along with the senate, in choosing an emperor. The center power for the Roman empire was generally the senate. The ruler for the Han dynasty was hereditary. The Han dynasty's military wasn't as loyal. Most of the soldiers were newly drafted and didn't have much experience. China had two capital cities which served as seats of power for emperors and they were Louyang (located in the east) and Chang'an (located in the West). The merchant class in Han was restricted by the government unlike the middle class in Rome whom were free from government constraints which allowed economic mobility. The imperial model was only revived in China later but it never revived in Rome.…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imperial Rome and Han China had many differences involving religion, technology, and women in society, but the similarities in these three subjects outnumber the amount of differences. Women in Rome and China had many of the same responsibilities. Technology in China was more advanced, but Rome was on top of advancing the field of architecture. Religion allowed these two empires to be alike but also different over the course of their reign. Differences make an empire unique, but similarities connect empires throughout the world.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Han Chinese were more diplomatic and wanted to avoid conflict as much as possible. There mindset was to win battles without fighting. Instead of using military and legions to defend their borders. They used walls and diplomacy to get other enemies away from attacking their borders. The romans though were a very attack mentality kind of military. They were very organized and had a lot of legions. They would use the citizens to sign up for the military. This was also a way to keep political control by making them sign up for the military. They used the legions and the military to defend their borders. A similarity though is that they both used roads and waterways for military access and trade routes. They could move the military easier from place to place. They could collect taxes and control trade. And also they could govern more effectively with use of messengers due to the…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some similarities of imperial administration in Imperial Rome and Han China include the general idea of equality, living under one ruler who gives the people some control, and the roles of families. Both empires believed in generalization of the people. Yes, they had one ruler, but everyone else underneath the ruler was made equal. Both Imperial Rome and Han China are controlled under one central leader.…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Han Dynasty and The Roman Empire both were able to expand and develop their empires with their distinctive governing methods and control. To China, the centerpiece that supervised everything was knows as Confucianism. With all dependability focused on the emperor and society serving as a family unit, Han China's political system was known for a centralized, closed unit. It was ruled by an emperor who greatly observed the Mandate of Heaven. The Han developed a supply of soldiers, which kept their borders secured and made them capable to exchange with others from time to time. On the other hand, Rome had a centralized, blended structure. The main focus points of the Roman Society were operated by a Roman Republic, which was more like a monarchy, who controlled their complex structure. The Roman Society had more residents and rights than the Hans, Roman's political control lay in the hands of the wealthy, which then they were elected to a political seat. The governors were picked from family networks. The only way Romans could accomplish anything big in a certain time span was to make strong changes in their community. It was an enormous weight on Rome's resources and power, when they had to stress over big wins. For example, when there was barely any food to support the developing empire. The Romans and the Hans both had their wealthiest people control over their peasants, which caused a social distribution to each and every one, and could have leaded to outbreaks in little battles, wars between the communities, and what not. This was entirely not beneficial on each empire's part and especially their social interaction.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The next similarity between Han China and Imperial Rome is the expansion of both their governments. Both societies sought to expand the borders of their empires through imperial expansion. They perceived threats to security led to wars and conquests, which increased the length of borders and led to more perceived threats. In vein of the Qin dynasty before the second empire, the primary goal of the Han dynasty was to unite all of China. To accomplish this, Han…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Roman and Han empires falls’ were similar because of their decline in economic trade. Trade was extremely important for the Romans and Chinese so when it began to decline, so did the rest of the empire. As both empires borders expanded, they had to take more of the military to defend the borders rather than the trade routes, so the trade routes became compromised. People began stealing goods from merchants making the routes extremely dangerous. Because their was much less trade, the taxes to the government were greatly reduced so they had to tax the people more. Most people could not afford the hike in taxes so the government was still unable to get all of their money, thus resulting in decline. This is similar to the decline of the Qin Dynasty because the Qin Dynasty had to raise taxes on peasants to try and support the…

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To begin with, decentralization occurred and upper classes’ values in both societies changed. In Han China, landlords ruled their neighborhoods according to their wishes. In Rome, farmers gathered under the protection of landlords. The decentralization occurred because in both societies, the central government was weakening and quality of imperial rule was declining so landlords became the source of power. Another reason was that in Han China, bureaucrats were becoming corrupt. In Rome, the upper class became more pleasure-seeking, and did not participate politically and economically. The upper classes’ shifting values caused the empires to crumble because they did not want what was contributing to the success of the empire, only to their personal gain.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays