Preview

ROMAN EMPIRE AND THE HAN DYNASTY IN CHINA

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1426 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
ROMAN EMPIRE AND THE HAN DYNASTY IN CHINA
ROMAN EMPIRE AND THE HAN DYNASTY IN CHINA

Rodrick Carter
HIEU 201
Liberty University
29 November 2014

Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty in China
The Roman Empire and Han Dynasty in China are two kingdoms that, despite the geographical difference between them, managed to achieve great success and failure in equal measure. Both were characterized by imperial dynasties that were headed by the emperors and they held large territories. Both of these kingdoms faced various challenges after their formation that became a major stabling block, but due to good leadership, they both managed to overcome and achieve success. Nevertheless, due to different reasons, both the Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty declined and fell. This paper analyzes the similarities and differences between the Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty taking into consideration their achievements and causes of their decline.
The Roman Empire was formed during the post-Republican period and it was characterized by a government that was headed by emperors. It also had large territorial holdings that were around the Mediterranean Sea in Asia, Africa, and Europe. The Roman Empire lived for a period of 500 years but was destabilized by numerous political conflicts and civil wars. Julius Caesar was among the perpetual ruler of the dynasty even though he was considered as a dictator that led to his assassination during the 44 BC1. The civil wars and several executions were random occurrence in the Roman Empire until Octavian, the adopted son of Caesar, rose to leadership and won battles over their long rivals Cleopatra and Mark Antony at the Battle of Actium in 31 BC. Octavian also managed to annex Egypt.
On the other hand, Han Dynasty was an imperial China dynasty that was formed in 206 BC. The dynasty was preceded by the Qin Dynasty in 221 to 207 BC2. The Han Dynasty unlike Roman Empire was founded by a rebel leader known as Liu Bang who was thirsty for power. Nevertheless, his newly found victory to



Bibliography: Adrian, Goldsworthy. In the Name of Rome: The Men Who Won the Roman Empire. London: Weidenfield and Nicholson, 2003. Adshead, Samuel., and Adrian, Miles. China in World History. London: MacMillan Press Ltd. New York: St. Martin 's Press, 2000. Benjamin, Isaac. The Limits of Empire: the Roman Army in the East. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992. Block, Leo. To Harness the Wind: A Short History of the Development of Sails. Annapolis: Naval Institute Press, 2003. Campbell, Duncan. The Rise of Imperial Rome, AD 14-193. New York: Osprey, 2013. Csikszentmihalyi, Mark. Readings in Han Chinese Thought. Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc, 2006. Goldsworthy, Adrian. The Complete Roman Army. London: Thames and Hudson, 2003.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The ancient civilizations of Rome and Han China shared both similarities and differences in their social, political and economical views.…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Han China (206 B.C.E. – 220 C.E.) and Imperial Rome (31 B.C.E. – 476 C.E.) have some similarities and differences such as in foundation, governmental control, and collapse. These factors either helped their empire or weakened them influencing their fall.…

    • 644 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    e west and the east, empires dominated the world from the 2nd century BC to the 2nd century AD. The main one in each area being the Roman Empire in the west, and the Chinese empire, or specifically the Han dynasty, in the east. While these two empires are thousands of miles apart and nearly one hundred years, there are many similarities between the two. The most significant difference between the two empires is the basis of government ideals.…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Han China during the time 200 bce. through 200 ce. and Imperial Rome during the time of 31 bce. though 476 ce. had many similarities and differences. Some of the similarities between the two are their religious policies, the significance of their armies, rebelliations from the people, and the role of the emperor. These empires had many differences as well such as the acceptance of outsiders, their influences on other regions, and their philosophies.…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Han and Roman Empire

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Roman Empire existed between 31 B.C.E to 476 C.E. and the Han Dynasty occurred 202 B.C.E. to 220 C.E. They existed at same times but were on opposite ends of Eurasia. They both had regions that were ruled by either kings, viceroys or governors in the name of the emperor. They were both similar in slavery, government, and their downfall. They also had their differences in religion, military, and center of power.…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Around 200 B.C.E. to 200 C.E. the empires of Rome and Han China flourished in the 1.5 million square miles. Each of their societies developed in vastly different lands. Separated from each other, Rome and China’s empires grew individually. Although separated by thousands of miles and differences of language, each society developed their own individual yet similar aspects. The societies of Ancient Rome and Han China were similar because of their patriarchal values which shaped their families and the status of their wealthy classes. Rome and China were different in their societies because of their individual uses of slavery and language.…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Compare and Contrast the Fall of the Han Dynasty with the Fall of the Roman Empire.…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Han Dynasty and The Roman Empire both were able to expand and develop their empires with their distinctive governing methods and control. To China, the centerpiece that supervised everything was knows as Confucianism. With all dependability focused on the emperor and society serving as a family unit, Han China's political system was known for a centralized, closed unit. It was ruled by an emperor who greatly observed the Mandate of Heaven. The Han developed a supply of soldiers, which kept their borders secured and made them capable to exchange with others from time to time. On the other hand, Rome had a centralized, blended structure. The main focus points of the Roman Society were operated by a Roman Republic, which was more like a monarchy, who controlled their complex structure. The Roman Society had more residents and rights than the Hans, Roman's political control lay in the hands of the wealthy, which then they were elected to a political seat. The governors were picked from family networks. The only way Romans could accomplish anything big in a certain time span was to make strong changes in their community. It was an enormous weight on Rome's resources and power, when they had to stress over big wins. For example, when there was barely any food to support the developing empire. The Romans and the Hans both had their wealthiest people control over their peasants, which caused a social distribution to each and every one, and could have leaded to outbreaks in little battles, wars between the communities, and what not. This was entirely not beneficial on each empire's part and especially their social interaction.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Roman and Han empires falls’ were similar because of their decline in economic trade. Trade was extremely important for the Romans and Chinese so when it began to decline, so did the rest of the empire. As both empires borders expanded, they had to take more of the military to defend the borders rather than the trade routes, so the trade routes became compromised. People began stealing goods from merchants making the routes extremely dangerous. Because their was much less trade, the taxes to the government were greatly reduced so they had to tax the people more. Most people could not afford the hike in taxes so the government was still unable to get all of their money, thus resulting in decline. This is similar to the decline of the Qin Dynasty because the Qin Dynasty had to raise taxes on peasants to try and support the…

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    "The Fall of the Western Roman Empire” www.suu.edu. Southern Utah University. Web. 01 Oct. 2012. <http://www.suu.edu/faculty/bostick/Sample%20Essays/Fall%20of%20Roman%20Empire.htm>.…

    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The ancient civilizations of Rome and Han China shared both similarities and differences in their social, political and economical views.…

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    To begin with, decentralization occurred and upper classes’ values in both societies changed. In Han China, landlords ruled their neighborhoods according to their wishes. In Rome, farmers gathered under the protection of landlords. The decentralization occurred because in both societies, the central government was weakening and quality of imperial rule was declining so landlords became the source of power. Another reason was that in Han China, bureaucrats were becoming corrupt. In Rome, the upper class became more pleasure-seeking, and did not participate politically and economically. The upper classes’ shifting values caused the empires to crumble because they did not want what was contributing to the success of the empire, only to their personal gain.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imperial Han and Imperial Rome were two very important empires in Europe and Asia. Even though their time in ruling was different they both were very powerful in their time. The Imperial Rules of Rome and Han China had differences and similarities in the techniques of imperial administration such as different ways of religion, Confucianism and Christianity, similar social aspects because of patriarchy as well as economic similarities such as trade in the Silk Road.…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Both the Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty declined gradually, mostly due to multiple invasions by foreign people. However, while the Roman Empire showed a decrease in population, Han population rose greatly, leading to two very different outcomes for the ancient civilizations.…

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Causes of 2nd Punic War

    • 2323 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Citations: 1. Errington, R.M. The Dawn of Empire: Rome’s Rise to World Power (Ithaca, NY; Cornell University Press, 1972)…

    • 2323 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays