"Thomas Hobbes (Leviathan) maintained that for social control to exist, there must be strong government to ensure moral and social harmony. Niccolo Machiavelli (The Prince) however, contended that social benefits for social stability and security can be achieved in the face of moral corruption."
In about 2000 words, write an essay based on research found in the two books above that talks about the role of government as a socializing agent and the role of morality in effective social control.
The basis of both Leviathan written by Thomas Hobbes and Niccolo Machiavelli's The Prince revolves around the use of Natural Law as well as the methods of governing people vis-à-vis the writers' perspectives on virtues and morality in the existence of a monarch. In my understanding, both books provide an interactive and discursive yet subjective extension towards the idea of government and its people, more so to the rights as well as the nature of human beings. Both books give insights to the intellectual minds of their writers, allowing me to delve into issues which I have never thought before, some of which are still applicable till today. I shall begin with my version of practical criticism on Leviathan, thereafter move to Machiavelli's The Prince, giving my perspectives on what I feel is a better form of government and the reasons I deem as appropriate to answer the requirement of this assignment; on the role of government as a socializing agent as well as the role of morality in the effectiveness of social control.
Leviathan by Hobbes from how I've read and interpreted is generally the ideal, morally upright ideas or conventions rising from the need to voice out opinions in relation to the exisiting Civil War that was still persisting in times when the writer expresses himself through the words found in the book. I may be judgmental when stating the above, however I feel that the ideas and thoughts brought forward by Hobbes are not all utopic, I will mention and elaborate further on what I feel is right and thus agree with what Hobbes has to say, but also in applying to my environment and my belief is vital in contributing towards the effectiveness of social control, I want to, and feel that it takes more than just a strong government and an ethical one to add to that.
Before I move on further into the ideas of ethics and role of government in the perspective of Hobbes, I will touch upon the natural law as proposed in the chapters preceding the second half of the book, Chapter 13 of Leviathan in particular. Hobbes states that the right of nature, "is the liberty each man hath to use his own power as he will himself for the preservation of his own nature; that is to say, of his own life; and consequently, of doing anything which, in his own judgment and reason, he shall conceive to be the aptest means thereunto." (Chapter XIV). Hobbes brings forward the idea of Natural Law as simply put, do not do harm to others, so that others will do no harm to you'. The concept of Natural Law, and the need for a strong government is birthed out of the idea that human beings are hedonistic creatures, that according to Hobbes, "the life of man, solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short.", there is therefore a need to govern man, who are perpetually at war with himself and others around him. Man needs control, because naturally, there is a tendency for man to defend himself, when threatened, for example, with a violent death. For Man is a helpless creature, that everyone despite the individual differences, will eventually respond the same way in the face of death, that is to defend himself. It is thereby important for a control to exist to protect Man and to have equality.
The need for a strong and central government comes clear from the understanding of Man as put forward in the first part of his book. In order for a community to have equal rights, to attain peace, power is needed and has to be given to a single leader...