Robert Frost’s poem “Road Not Taken” is metaphorically written to relate to self-hood; Frost makes his poem sound as though he is about to take a stroll through the woods. Turns out, these so called paths/roads are not actually roads. In fact, they are paths in life and Frost is stuck in a minor predicament when coming to choose which path he should take. After taking a long hard look down both paths, he ironically takes the road less traveled. During the second and third stanza, Frost mentions that both the paths had actually looked just about the same, which comes to a standing argument- how did he choose the better path? Reading along, toward the end of the poem, Frost pretty much says that he has no regrets, content with his decision of taking the second path. Under some context, it is tricky to understand how he ultimately chose the right path for him, making Frost’s poem confusing to many readers; two men each wrote their opinions in articles on the Road Not Taken, which may provide better information on this poem. Their names are Frank Lentricchia and Mark Richardson. Lentricchia considers Frosts’ poem to be an analogical landscape poem and mentions how Frost makes it seem that this poem is a fireside poem. Richardson views Frosts’ poem a little differently; he finds this poem to be ironic and comical, but yet further into his article he is able to share the serious matter in this poem. The moral point of not only “The Road Not Taken”, but Lentricchia and Richardson’s articles, is that in life we have important decisions to make and these decisions make up a large part of who we are as individuals.
When first reading Frost’s poem, it was difficult to understand what exactly the rationality in his decision of which road to take was. After reading it a few more times and hearing lectures in class, the poem slowly began to make more sense. Frost metaphorically is writing about a walk in the woods by using nature as symbols to represent life; which...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document