Both Rizal and Aquino showed heroism for our country’s independence. They fought for what is right and for the right of every Filipino. Rizal wrote novels to awaken the minds of the Filipinos with what was happening in our country. On the other hand, Aquino wanted to stop the Marcos regime which marred massive corruption. Both intentions were for the common good of everybody. They are good set of examples to show sense of nationalism. Their noble acts are like matchsticks waiting to be lit. Rizal’s execution triggered the Katipunan Revolution and Aquino’s assassination led to the People Power Revolution. Both of these events were movements that led to the Philippines’ freedom from the abuses of the government.
It doesn't matter whether we should call Aquino a hero or not. What really matters here is the act and what he has done for the Filipinos. Aquino is a frank person. He says what he means and means what he says. He expresses his thoughts whether it is good or bad. Just like Rizal but in a different perspective. He had fought for the rights of the Filipino without violence. He also expressed his ideas even though it would harm his own life. Same as what Ninoy Aquino did. For us being a hero is doing the right thing for someone or others even though it would put their own lives in danger. It is sacrificing one's life and freedom for someone to have it at the right reasons. Hero or not, Aquino should always be remembered for the goodness that he has done.
Please join StudyMode to read the full document