Preview

Right to Bear Arms.

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
410 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Right to Bear Arms.
Should we have the right to bear arms?
Bearing arms gives the person an easier way to wound or kill another person. This would result into deaths of many thousands, dying at gunpoint. Ordinary citizens should not be granted the right to bear arms as it provides an easier option to wound someone, result in countless number of deaths and provide weapons for criminals/terrorists which could aid them commit crimes.
Bearing arms gives people an easier solution to wound or kill someone. Allowing ordinary citizens to bear arms whether for self-defense or target training should not be allowed as these weapons are frequently used for the wrong reason; for example, using the weapon with the intention to wound or kill someone. Many countries that allow citizens to have the right to bear arms contain many reports on deaths from gunpoint. In USA alone, on average 10,000 people die a year due to firearms, whether the deaths are murder, from self-defense or accidents. Ordinary citizens should not be given the right to bear firearms as it provides an easier way to kill or wound someone, rather than actually help the people.
Firearms are one of the major causes of deaths in the today’s modern society, whether during wartime or peacetime. Granting ordinary citizens the right to bear arms in Australia would just add more countless deaths to the list. Ordinary citizens should not be granted firearms as this provides the firearm’s holder the power to either kill or injure or let the person go free. This is too much power for an untrained ordinary citizen to handle. If Australian citizens were to be granted the right to bear firearms, then Australia would face many countless more deaths, and it will quickly become the country’s biggest killer, just because ordinary citizens could bear firearms.
Being given the right to bear firearms would give criminals and terrorists an upper hand for committing crime and acts of terror. If people were given the right to bear arms then criminals

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Analysis 1.1

    • 653 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The history of the right to bear arms, this has been an American tradition since colonist set foot on North American soil. Mass murders have been cause by guns does this mean we should only allow our military to have guns? I believe in the constitution we have the right to bear arms. It was written in the constitution for a reason. Without guns it makes our country weak. I’m not talking about just our military having them I’m talking about citizens not being able to have guns.…

    • 653 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Carrying a concealed gun reduces murder and other types of crimes. If everyone was to carry a concealed gun there would be more fights because people would think that they were cool because they carry a gun at all times. People should carry a concealed gun because they would be able to defend themselves when in a fight. Adults should be able to carry a concealed gun with a license.…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I think that American citizen should not be able to own a firearm because many people kill innocent people all the time. Many people kill for violent reason and for no reason. There is a lot of heart aches from all the killing and massacres that people do. The Brady Campaign to prevent gun violence reports that an average of 268 people are shot every day in America. That's 97,820 per year. Maybe, but people with guns kill many, many more people than they would if they didn't have guns, and guns are designed to kill as many people as possible. We don't know if the murderers are suffering from a suicidal depression, but many mass shooters in the past were. And guess what? People suffer from suicidal depression everywhere in the world. People get angry and upset everywhere in the world. The reason is that people in those places who have these impulses have an easy way to access lethal weapons and unlimited ammunition. But if you want to kill large numbers of people and you happen to be an American, you'll find it easy to do.…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many Americans believe that Gun-Control Laws should be enforced, because “Individuals do not need guns for protection; it is the role of local and federal government to protect the people through law enforcement agencies and the military.” (http://www.StudentNewsDaily.com) All Individuals deserve the right to carry a gun with them at all times, to use for protection. According to the Second Amendment in the Constitution, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” (https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/second_amendment) Obtaining a gun, gives one the sense of feeling safe and protected given any situation. No one knows when they may be “attacked” or in danger, and the protection they need from the government may not always be there to protect them. Every American must learn self-defense and use it when needed, they shouldn’t have to rely and anyone but themselves.…

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Keep-And-Bear Arms

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages

    According to a database maintained by The Guardian newspaper, 203 out of 1,024 people killed by the U. S. police in 2015 were unarmed and the individual right to keep and bear arms does not help. By definition, the right to keep and bear arms often referred to as the right to bear arms or to have arms, the Constitution’s second amendment, allows one to possess arms for self-defense. This means anyone in America has the right to keep and bear arms. However, society is less safe when everyone has the right to carry guns. The question is who should have the right to bear arms in self-defense? The right of police officers and individuals to keep and bear arms in self-defense should be further restricted.…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is true that people have the right to bear arms because of the Second Amendment. The Second Amendment states that "A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” But, just because people have the right to bear arms doesn’t mean that every should have a concealed weapons. Criminals are 75% more likely to carry when committing a crime too because there is a greater chance of finding a civilian with a concealed weapon.…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The right to bear arms is the the Second Amendment in the United States constitution. What says a well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. The right to bear arms has been around this country long then it's been a country. Putting more restrictions on guns just goes against what our founding fathers intend the nation to be like and infringes against the right to bear arms.The second amendment supports my claim which is anti-gun control laws and how putting restrictions on gun makes it…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Citizens have been bearing arms since the beginning of time, but in today’s time it is becoming more of a problem. Having the proper gun control would play a major part in decreasing the crime and murder rate in the US. The second amendment states, “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.”…

    • 165 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anti-Gun Control

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The United States has a law called The Bill of Rights, and in these rights one of them states the following; “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” They label it as the Right to Bear Arms. The American dream means different things to different people. To many people, freedom is possession and owing a gun of any kind. Gun Control is strict enough with the requirements for even getting a gun. Society benefits from firearms in the hands of responsible citizens. Attempts to keep firearms away from these citizens do more harm than good; gun control needs to be less strict and more basic.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Guns are used 2.5 million times a year in self defense. Armed citizens kill more criminals than police do. They shoot and kill twice as many in a year then they do. Which is something cool to know about concealed carry. Although, the second amendment of the US constitution allows citizens to bear arms, adults should have the right to concealed carry, because criminals are less likely to attack someone that might have a gun, criminals carry concealed carry regardless of legality,and carrying a concealed weapon could help stop all of the shooting sprees.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marjolijn Bijlefeld states from “The Gun Control Debate” that we have the right to carry “to execute the laws of the union, suppress insurrections, and repel Invasions.” At any moment across the nation a shooter could be lurking in plain sight. Congress has brought this problem up numerous times, allowing only a…

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Right To Bear Arms

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Americans are teeming with guns what if governments were going to take away guns but then leave criminals armed. “The right to bear arms in the 2nd amendment has increased firearms sales 215% since 2007”. “In 1985 it was issues for a concealed carry in the state of Pennsylvania”.…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Guns Should Be Banned

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The first reason that guns should be banned for ordinary citizens is that guns are the sign of violence. Guns are made for killing and harming other human beings. In many states there are “Shoot First” laws that allow people to defend themselves in public using guns with no duty to retreat. The Shoot First law can be dangerous to other people who are present in the area and people can get injured and killed. Why should governments allow people to own and carry guns in the name of protection? When there are law and police in a country people do not…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The second reason guns should not be permitted to citizens is, their main purpose is to kill. Back when Americans first settled here, guns were a part in how Americans survived. Guns were accustomed to protect Puritans against intruders and animals. The Puritans also believed that killing another was immoral, unless threaten. These beliefs still exist today to an extent, but morals, lifestyles, and times have changed. Today, instead of protecting, guns can be used to enhance criminals' power, giving him the ability to take ones' life. With that being said, guns have only…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics