Preview

Richard Iii

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
4396 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Richard Iii
Analysis of Richard III

Members:
Natalia Molina
Melisa Ocanto
Melina Pustilnik
Vanesa Verna

Licenciatura en Lengua Inglesa

Universidad Nacional de San Martín RICHARD III

1) Richard III: hero or villain.
2) Analyze women in the play.
3) Analyze the use of dramatic irony in the play.
4) Analyze the opening soliloquy in Richard III.
5) Which is Richard 's hamartia? When does it occur?
6) Where do you find the climax of the play?
7) Where do you find the catharsis and where the anagnorisis?

1) Richard III: hero or villain.

In order to analyze if Richard III is a hero or a villain, it is necessary to first comprehend both words. On one hand, a hero or heroine, according to the Dictionary of Literary Terms is the principal male and female characters in a work of literature. In criticism the terms carry no connotations of virtuousness or honor. On the other hand, a villain is described as “the wicked character in a story and, in an important and special sense, the evil machinator or plotter in a play”. We must know that these two definitions are not restrictive of each other. We must also bear in mind Aristotle’s own interpretation of tragic hero:
• “Good or fine”: Aristotle relates this quality to moral purpose and says it is relative to class: “Even a woman may be good, and also a slave, though the woman may be said to be an inferior being, and the slave quite worthless.”
• “Fitness of character” (true to type): courage is appropriate for a warrior but not for a woman.
• “Consistency” (true to themselves): Once a character 's personality and motivations are established, these should continue throughout the play.
• “Necessary or probable”: Characters must be logically constructed according to “the law of probability or necessity” that governs the actions of the play.
• “True to life and yet more beautiful” (idealized, ennobled). In the case of this play, Richard does not fulfill the first characteristic cited above. This



Bibliography: ARISTOTLE. Poetics. DICTIONARY OF LITERARY TERMS AND LITERARY THEORY. England, Penguin, 1999. HALIO J. L. Understanding the Merchant of Venice: A Student Casebook to Issues, Sources, and Historical Documents. London, The Greenwood Press, 2000. SHAKESPEARE, W. Richard III. New York, Simon & Schuster, Inc., 1996.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Jane Eyre

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages

    William Shakespeare’s 16th century historically tragic play, King Richard III and Al Pacino’s 20th century docudrama, Looking for Richard portray parallel themes of war, characterisation of Richard in context and plot. Shakespeare wrote King Richard III during the reign of Elizabeth I and the propaganda during the time supported the Elizabethan monarch. During Looking for Richard’s era, a concept of sheer evil appeared which presented characters whose evil was unmotivated. The issues Shakespeare explored are still experienced in contemporary surrounding, and reflect in Pacino’s text. Both texts explore similar aspects of war, characterisation of Richard in context and plot portraying in different textual forms. Thus, as texts are a reflection of their context, the purpose to connect with their audience remains constant irrespective of context.…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Edmund In King Lear Essay

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages

    3a) From the text it can be seen that Edmund has been set as one of the Villains of the play. His inexorable position as a bastard in society has made Edmund bitter and resentful,…

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Shoehorn Sonata

    • 1726 Words
    • 7 Pages

    TASK: Re-read the play. Go through and highlight specific characteristics of our two protagonists – ensuring that you can provide evidence from the play (The evidence could be lines or phrases of dialogue, their actions, current or past, or their body language as described in the text.)…

    • 1726 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Intrinsic to both texts, there is the notion that art is used to directly influence and impact existing historical perceptions. Shakespeare’s “Richard III” explores this idea, using the most influential artistic medium of the time, theatre, to further publicise the ‘Tudor Myth’ perception. On stage, the visual motif of Richard’s appearance as “deformed, unfinished” reflects his moral deficiencies, reinforced by his soliloquys and asides that expose his underlying treachery. He forges a duplicitous role as both director and actor within the play, stating in the opening soliloquy “plots that I have laid, inductions dangerous…” Richard seemingly ‘stage manages’ the entirety of his world, creating a sense of dramatic irony from the juxtaposing of the different “masks” he feigns in contrast to his true intentions; he plays the role of the “grieving” brother, “Christian prince,” etc. As such, Richard’s meta-theatricality engages us on a psychological level that reinforces the perception of the Tudor Myth given not just the heinous nature of his crimes but the “villainous”…

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    War is a predominant theme in ‘Richard III,’ the ongoing turmoil between the Lancasters and the Yorks in the War of the Roses the premise for the play. The battle (and defeat of Richard) at Bosworth, is the conclusive decider of the text, ending Richard’s reign as King, and setting the Lancasters back on the throne. Looking for Richard portrays the Battle of Bosworth, the employment of the visual medium altering its depiction. In the play the battle and Richard’s murder is a relatively quick affair, the stage direction, ‘they fight. King Richard III is slain,’ the only orated form of violence. Through use of the visual medium however, Pacino is able to dramatize Richard’s final scene, turning Richard’s murder from a lost fight, into an execution. Pacino’s representation of the battle displays views in society at that time; revealed in the numerous ‘vox pops,’ it is shown that the common public are not very knowledgeable of Shakespeare. By extenuating the battle scene Pacino is able to…

    • 962 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    King Richard’s ability as an actor within a play explores how this type of villainy was entertaining in the era of Shakespeare. Richard’s evil is immediately established as his moral deformities are clearly embodied in his physical deformities. In justifying his premeditated meddling, he personifies war in his first soliloquy. ‘Grim visag’d war hath supported his wrinkled front’ and moved to caper ‘ nimbly in a lady’s chamber!’ Richard’s nature: ‘Deform’d, unfinished’ thus justifies his evil as he cannot participate in the war -lovemaking atmosphere. This was obviously a form of entertainment to the Shakespearean audience who had known of the war of the Roses and Richard’s deformities.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout King Richard III, the value of kingship is one that is explored greatly. The play’s message about kingship is not only seen through Richard’s deceptive schemes but it is also through the fall of his reign where his conscience begins to show, resulting in the destruction of his power. Not only is Richard’s poor kingship seen through his own realization, but it is also seen through other character’s perception of Richard’s reign. Richard’s poor kingship can be seen through Richmond’s expression of Richard as ‘A base foul stone made precious by the foil of England’s chair, where he is falsely set.’ In this quote, Richmond metaphorically describes Richard as nothing more but a worthless rock only made to appear like a gem because of the throne in which falsely claims. It is through this metaphoric description of Richard as a worthless rock that we are able to comprehend what little skills Richard possesses as a king. The highlighting of Richard’s poor kingship not only helps us to comprehend his devious ways but also understand the importance of the value of kingship throughout one’s reign.…

    • 1382 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The texts King Richard III and Looking for Richard both accept the centrality of power and the yearning for it, as a central plot driver and an assumed part of the human condition. However, each presents a different perspective as to the nature of power; its origins and morality.…

    • 2201 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    King Richard III and Looking For Richard are compositional products that directly correlate to historical and social contexts respectively, the latter drawing on the former’s challenge to the context in which it was written. Shakespeare’s late sixteenth century play was crafted in a turbulent time of rigid political and religious adherence, and written under the weight of sectarian distrust and forced political alignment to the reigning Tudors. Thus, Shakespeare’s portrayal of Richard as a Yorkist focus’s on his devilish and Machiavellian nature. Written eight decades earlier, Niccolo Machiavelli’s The Prince asserts that an effective ruler should abandon traditional Christian virtues and morality to grow in power at any cost: ‘Politics have no relation to morals.’ This view of power and politics indicates a shift to a secular notion of leadership. Richard is, to a degree, a Machiavel; he calls himself a devil, ‘Thus like the formal Vice, Iniquity, I moralise two meanings in one word.’ (III.iii.82–83) This play is weighted with rigid historical context, but also challenges the notion of providentialism through Richard’s determination to ‘prove a villain.’ There is also a challenge in Pacino’s Looking for Richard for the modern audience, and…

    • 1685 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In KRII, Richard’s evil dual personality was an inconceivable concept to the Elizabethan audience. They viewed Richard as a renowned villain of history during the War of the Roses, and only as a villain within the play. This allowed no room for tragedy, as they did not sympathise with Richard. Richard’s villainy was also further emphasised in his physical deformity, hinting at the corruption of the mind. Richard is seen as the vice of morality plays, and an example of the Christian devil in how he acts and constantly reminds us that he is “…determined to prove a villain” [Act 1, Scene 1] in his soliloquies and asides.…

    • 1761 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reflecting Elizabethan moral absolutes, Shakespeare acknowledges that a capacity for deception, manipulation and the quest for power is central to the human condition and clearly delineates the complex nature of evil in the character of Richard. Shakespeare dramatically portrays Richard’s villainous intentions and motivations to the Elizabethan audience in the opening soliloquy announcing- “he is made villain” to “usurp” the throne like a symbolic “usurping boar” being physically and morally “deformed” by his craving for power. Subsequently, Richard uses his guises as a tool for deception; he is a passionate lover desperately “wooing Lady Anne” yet a conniving murderer killing her husband, also ironically appearing to be a “loyal loving brother” by eradicating “George” himself. Shakespeare then reaffirms the results of human’s corruption and insatiability for power to the Elizabethan audience as he “proves a villain” must “fall prey to his” own “subtle and treacherous”…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Richard 3rd Comparison

    • 1485 Words
    • 6 Pages

    2. List the people who die by Richard's orders in Act III. What does each of them realize as they die? What does this suggest about the idea of justice presented in the play?…

    • 1485 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    madness in the play. Characterization is representation of a character or characters on the stage…

    • 1400 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Richard Iii

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the first scene of the play, Richard announces in a narration, his plan to become king. Richard plainly states that he is "Deformed, Unfinished, and sent before his time" and "since he cannot prove to be a lover; he is determined to prove a villain." As a villain Richard must be heartless, he cannot let his emotions interfere with his actions. He must also be intelligent and organized; a villain must know exactly what he has to do, when he has to do it and how he is going to do it. A villain must also be manipulative and persuasive so that if he is accused of a crime or if he finds himself between a rock and a hard place he is able to talk his way out or convince people that he did not commit the crimes in question. A villain must also have scapegoats to use if he is discovered or if he is in a dangerous situation. Richard devised a brutal stratagem to ascend the English throne. Brilliantly, he executed his plan. Heartlessly, he executed family, friends, and subjects. Richard did indeed display these characteristics and therefore fulfilled his goal to ascend the throne, as you will see in the paragraphs below.…

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Richard Iii

    • 1660 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The audience of Richard III experiences a complex, ambiguous, and highly changeable relationship with the main character. Richard is clearly a villain—he declares outright in his very first speech that he intends to stop at nothing to achieve his nefarious designs. But despite his open allegiance to evil, he is such a charismatic and fascinating figure that, for much of the play, we are likely to sympathize with him, or at least to be impressed with him. Even characters such as Lady Anne, who has an explicit knowledge of his wickedness, allow themselves to be seduced by his brilliant wordplay, his skillful argumentation, and his relentless pursuit of…

    • 1660 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays