Richard Iii

Kings are generally thought to be beautiful, God-like humans
from a certain genealogy.   They are placed at the throne due to
whom they were born to and/or who they marry.   Richard of
Glouster is born of the royal family but, he does not possess the
qualities of a King to be legitimate according to Shakespeare’s
Richard III.
Richard and his brothers are all entitled to the throne if
their father dies.   By killing his two brothers, Richard is the
only person in his immediate family entitled to the throne.   Why
must he kill his brothers so that he may gain the crown?
Shakespeare depicts Edward and Clarence as far more worthy of the
crown.   They possess traits of a King which Richard does not
possess.
Richard states in his opening speech “Unless to spy my
shadow in the sun/And descant on mine own deformity./ And
therefore since I cannot prove a lover” (1.1.26-28). In this
speech Richard admits he cannot be a lover because he is ugly
with deformity.   This imperfectness does not fit the perfect
qualities known to Kings.   His brothers, on the other hand, do
possess the ability to love and both were married or betrothed.
Edward even had two women to love!   Some may say that Edward was
illegitimate because of his other lover, but, is it better and
more respectable to not be able to have love or to have several
loves?   A King should be able to love to rule a Kingdom otherwise
he may be a ruthless killer as Shakespeare demonstrates in the
play.  
Gaining the hand of a woman not only makes a King look
worthy to love but also is used for political gains.   Richard
himself demonstrates this as he ruthlessly goes after Ann after
killing her lover and her Father.   Through manipulation but not
by his heart he gains Ann’s hand.   So, he does gain a woman for
political strength but he still does not fulfill the trait of a
King as a loving individual.  
Why does Richard believe he should be... [continues]

Read full essay