Rich Con Steel Analysis

Only available on StudyMode
  • Topic: President, Technology, President of the United States
  • Pages : 2 (516 words )
  • Download(s) : 245
  • Published : December 9, 2010
Open Document
Text Preview
RICH CON STEEL – Case Analysis.
Desired functionality from new system: Ordering/receiving raw material, tracking inventory, filling orders for customers and billing. Current Business process: Complex. Focused on distributing hardware. No manufacturing beyond cutting sheet metal. Legacy Systems: IBM System Three machine (1969). Key punch operation. No database. Homegrown code by Rich Con (Low quality?). No ability to track orders – customer, purchase and work. Reporting was vey tedious. Maintenance was a challenge as technology was becoming obsolete. In-house development of a new system (customizing an AT&T accounting package) did not work due to improper product selection and extensive modifications made to the package. Company decided to select an integrated package tailor made for metal industry that runs on AT&T hardware. Analysis

A. Distribution of roles and responsibilities –
* Marty Sawyer was responsible for
* Managing a company as the President.  
* Integrating a new IT system (75%)
* Operationalizing of Roundo machine
* Marty had too much on her plate and she was able to do justice to any of the 3 roles. She should have formed her technical team and delegated the responsibility of Selection of new technology system to this new. In the end, the issues as a result of new technology implementation became too big and cumbersome to handle. As a result, she could not devote any time to her primary role as a President of the company. This was one of the compelling reasons for the firm’s downfall.

B. Unwillingness of employees to use the new system –
* There was no proper training scheduled for the employees. * The employees had no incentive to learn the software and they were the new system incorrectly. * They went back to the paper based process, because it was quicker and needed no learning curve.   * Employees felt that they were not prepared for this new system.

C. Improper Implementation...
tracking img