To support their claim that science fiction is a specific form of mythology, Sutton and Sutton move deeper into their claim by quoting critics such as Levi-Strauss, Arthur C. Clarke, Rudolph Bultmann and Jung. Sutton and Sutton speak on views by Levi-Strauss and if we can accept it, “Levi-Strauss suggests that both myth and science be considered as modes of structuring the universe” (Sutton 231). In Clark’s short story “The Star”, Sutton and Sutton states “as myth, such a story is certainly conscious and literary than early myth…rather it is the mythology concocted for the delight of technological man” (Sutton 237). After speaking on the view of Bultmann, Sutton and Sutton explain, “an example of the reverse process is provided by science fiction in which the scientific mode of thought is intentionally mythologized” (Sutton 233). All of the many critics attempt to demonstrate how myth and science are, in many ways, quite similar. This helps Sutton and Sutton’s claim because science fiction to them is a form of mythology.
In their article “Science Fiction as Mythology,” Sutton and Sutton argue that science fiction works as a sort of self-conscious mythology...a “mythology for the delight of technological man” (Sutton 237). Sutton and Sutton speak on the differences between myth and science and explain that both “provide an overview of existence by bridging inner reality and outer reality” (Sutton 232). Myth tries... [continues]
Cite This Essay
(2008, 04). The Rhetoric of Science Fiction. StudyMode.com. Retrieved 04, 2008, from http://www.studymode.com/essays/Rhetoric-Science-Fiction-141884.html
"The Rhetoric of Science Fiction" StudyMode.com. 04 2008. 04 2008 <http://www.studymode.com/essays/Rhetoric-Science-Fiction-141884.html>.
"The Rhetoric of Science Fiction." StudyMode.com. 04, 2008. Accessed 04, 2008. http://www.studymode.com/essays/Rhetoric-Science-Fiction-141884.html.