Research Paper

Only available on StudyMode
  • Download(s) : 75
  • Published : April 16, 2013
Open Document
Text Preview
Before
The Hon’ble High Court of Delhi, New Delhi

Application No _____/2013
Athletica Ganges……………………...………………….………………………... Petitioner v.
Government of India.………………………...………………............................ Respondent

With

Contempt Petition No _____/2013
Athletica Ganges………………………………………………………………….Petitioner v.
Government of India …………………………...…………..….………..……… Respondent

Table of Contents

Table of ContentsI
Index of AbbreviationsII
Index of AuthoritiesIII
Statement of JurisdictionVII
Statement of FactsVIII
Questions PresentedXI
Summary of PleadingsXII
Pleadings and Authorities- 1 -
1.The Respondent is justified in Rescinding the Contract and Invoking Arbitration:- 1 - 1.1The Petitioner has failed to make necessary disclosures to the Respondent:- 1 - 1.2The Petitioner has been involved in Crimes of Financial Impropriety:- 2 - 1.3The Respondent has not violated the Company’s trade secret rights:- 4 - 2The Arbitral Award is not liable to be Set Aside:- 4 -

2.1The Petitioner has accepted the jurisdiction of the Arbitrator:- 5 - 2.2The Arbitrator is the sole judge of quality and quantity of Evidence submitted:- 6 - 2.3The Arbitrator’s view is in keeping with the Public Policy of India:- 7 -

3The Respondent is not Guilty of Civil Contempt of Court.- 13 - 4.The Respondent is not liable for Perjury.- 15 -
Prayer- 18 -

Index of Abbreviations

§:Section
§§:Sections
:Paragraph
¶¶:Paragraphs
A.P.:Andhra Pradesh
A.C.:Appellate Cases
AIR:All India Reporter
Anr.:Another
Bom.:Bombay
Cri.L.J:Criminal Law Journal
K.B.:King’s Bench
Mad.:Madras
n.:Note
Ors.:Others
MMDR : Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 SC:Supreme Court
SCC:Supreme Court Cases
Sd/-:Signed
Supp.:Supplementary
U.P.:Uttar Pradesh
U.S.:United States
Index of Authorities

Cases
1974] AC 113- 11 -
A.G. v. Walt Hamstow, UDC (1895) 11 TLR 533- 15 -
Adikanda Swain v. Emperor, AIR 1947 Pat 251, p 542; Kali Shankar Chatterjee v. Sarat Chandra Dey, (1977) Cal HCN 538- 17 - All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam v. l.K. Tripathi, (2009) 5 SCC 417- 15 - Asgarall v. Emperor AIR 1942 Nag 80- 16 -

Ashish Kumar Kundu v. A.K.Tandon, 1994 (4) SLR 319- 16 -
Attorney General v. Guardian Newspapers Ltd [1988] AII ER 545- 11 - Babu Ram Gupta v. Sudhir Bhasin, AIR 1979 SC 1582- 14 -
Badat & Co v. East India Trading Co, AIR 1964 SC 538- 13 -
Bhagwati Foundation v. Commissioner MCD, Writ Petition (C) Nos. 146- 2 - BSNL vs. BWL Industries Pvt. Ltd., O.M.P. 415/2003- 7 -
BWL Ltd. v. MTNL, 2007 (4) ARB LR 398 (Delhi)- 8 -
Castrol Australian Pty Ltd v. EmTech Associated Pty Ltd, (1980) 51 FLR 184- 11 - Coco v. A.N. Clark Ltd, [1969] RPC 41- 4 -
Dharmavir Singh & Ors. v. Smt. Navraj Sindhu, 1997 AIHC 259- 15 - Edpuganti Bapanaiah v. Sri K.S.Raju & Ors, 2007 AP High Court, Contempt Case No.915 of 2002- 16 - Ganga Retreat & Towers Ltd. v. State of Rajasthan, (2003) 12 SCC 91- 2 - House of Spring Gardens Point Blank, [1983] FSR 213- 4 -

In the Matter of the Application of Federation Internationale de Basketball for a Subpoena Pursuant 28 U.S.C.S 1782- 10 - Initial Services Ltd v. Pueterils, [1968] 1 QB 396- 11 -
Konrad Wiedemann Gmbh v. Standard Castings Pvt. Ltd, [1985] (10) IPLR 243- 4 - Krishna Bhagya Jala Nigam Ltd. v. Harishchandra Reddy, AIR 2007 SC 817- 6 - M.P. Sharma v. Satish Chandra, AIR 1954 SC 300- 11 -

Moorgate Tobacco Co Ltd v. Philips Morris Ltd, [1991] AII ER 341- 11 - Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Jagan Nath Ashok, (1987) 4 SCC 497- 7 -, - 13 - N., J., Y., W., v. FINA, CAS 98/208- 8 -

Narayana Panicker v. The Sub...
tracking img