Preview

Republic of Argentina et al. v. Weltover, Inc. et al. – Case Review

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1731 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Republic of Argentina et al. v. Weltover, Inc. et al. – Case Review
Republic of Argentina et al. v. Weltover, Inc. et al. – Case Review

Introduction
The present paper discusses the case of the Republic of Argentina et al. v. Weltover Inc. et al. The case at hand concerns a dispute over the jurisdictional admissibility of a claim originally brought by the respondents in the present case. The document would present information over the theoretical terms and concepts used in the judgement. Afterwards, we would summarize the facts of the case, address the legal issue and present the argumentation of the parties and the conclusion of the Court.
Conceptual Framework
This part would provide the theoretical background needed for the proper understanding of the case, the applicable laws and the conclusions of the Court. It would also provide a brief procedural history.
Definitions
Jurisdiction – the authority of a court to give a ruling on a case i.e. verdict in a legal dispute between two parties.
Subject matter jurisdiction – the authority of a court to hear and decide on a certain case on the basis of specific subject or type
Personal jurisdiction – as well the authority of courts over the two parties to decide on certain case
Forum non conveniens or “inconvenient forum” – a municipal court declining to hear a dispute because it is more appropriate to be heard in a foreign court
Nominalism – The concept encompasses the principle that fluctuations in the purchasing power or in the foreign exchange rate of money does not affect the amount owed (i.e. the particular sum of money owed) under an obligation to pay. In other words, the amount is fixed and remains unchanged irrespective of the changes in the value of money.
Place of payment –This is the place of performance of the obligation of a debtor to pay under an international contract.
Direct effect – 1) an effect is “direct” if it comes as an “immediate consequence of the defendant’s … activity”
Bonds – an investment tool whereby an entity borrows money for a defined



References: - Republic of Argentina ET AL v Weltover, Inc. Et Al - R. August, D. Mayer, M. Bixby, International Business Law (Fifth edition, Pearson education, 2008)

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Retard

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The court: (1 mark) • • What is the name of the court? In which jurisdiction does this court operate?…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    California Court System

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Within the California Court systems, there are also three different types of jurisdiction. Jurisdiction basically determines whether a court has power to determine the verdict in a particular case. The first type of jurisdiction is called exclusive jurisdiction and it means that only a certain type of court can decide a case. This can be family court or bankruptcy court. The second type of jurisdiction is general jurisdiction and this means that a court has the authority to oversee a wide variety of cases. California’s superior courts have general jurisdiction. The third type of jurisdiction is called limited jurisdiction, and it limits the authority of a court. A good example of limited jurisdiction is small claims court.…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Court Systems

    • 1067 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Courts of original jurisdiction hear the original evidence and thoughts along with witness testimony for the first time. Supreme courts has exclusive jurisdiction over the cases it hears, and parties may not settle a dispute between states without the original authority of the Supreme Court. After both sides are presented, a decision is made by either a judge or a jury. Both federal and state courts harbor trial courts, and conduct trials under two subdivisions of this jurisdiction. These subsets are ‘Limited Jurisdiction’ and ‘General…

    • 1067 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Funny Face Case Study

    • 1781 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Generally, this power only covers a specific geographic region. For example in the state court system, a court's in personam jurisdiction usually extends to the state's borders, whereas a federal court exerts power over a greater area (Kubasek, Browne, Giampetro-Meyer, Barkacs, Herron, Williamson, & Dhooge, 2011). Because this case involves multiple parties from multiple geographic areas, the statutes regarding in personam jurisdiction must be scrutinized for all three states involved (New York, California, and Florida) before a venue may be decided upon.…

    • 1781 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hsc300 Unit 4

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages

    8. Venue and Jurisdiction: Disagreement about where and which courts will hear claims; resolves which courts such judicial action will take place…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Jurisdiction is defined in our textbooks, as “The legal authority or power to create and enforce laws within a particular area” (Wright, 2012).…

    • 1226 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Psy/201 Quiz

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages

    | | |(6). |If a case may be brought in either federal court or in state court, jurisdiction is said to be:…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Subject matter jurisdiction is the courts authority over the dispute between the two parties (Melvin, S.P., 2011, p59). State courts are who handle any matter involving state statues, state common law or a state constitutional issue (Melvin, S.P., 2011, p60).…

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    An important concept this week is jurisdiction. As the text explains, a court must have subject matter jurisdiction to hear a case. Subject matter jurisdiction is rather straight forward - the court must have jurisdic tion to hear the particular type of dispute (see my video for further explanation of this concept).…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Criminal jurisdiction and civil jurisdiction brings about the protective jurisdiction of courts. They necessitate the occasions for instituting the proceedings. Further criminal and civil jurisdiction therefore implies with respect to the mature of the subject matter and civil or criminal mature of the actions. Such an action therefore does not aim in the creation of another authority. Territorial aspects may come in hand, however the nature of the action determines the jurisdiction the case will be handled. It merely extends the limits of the particular jurisdiction. It is therefore not mandatory.…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The original jurisdiction of a court is the power to hear a case for the first time, as opposed to appellate jurisdiction, when a court has the power to review a lower court's decision.…

    • 1135 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jurisdiction is the authority given by law to a court to try cases and rule on legal matters within a particular geographic area and/or over certain types of legal case. Venue is the particular county or geographical area in which a court with jurisdiction may hear and determine a case.…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Presidents tend to choose judges from their own political party because judges may serve for…

    • 250 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When international commercial disputes must be settled under the laws of one of the countries concerned, jurisdiction is generally determined in one of three ways:…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In view of the principle that once a court has acquired jurisdiction, that jurisdiction continues until the court has done all that it can do in the exercise of that jurisdiction. This principle also means that once jurisdiction has attached, it cannot be ousted by subsequent happenings or events, although of a character which would have prevented jurisdiction from attaching in the first instance. The court, once jurisdiction has been acquired, retains that jurisdiction…

    • 3257 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays