Preview

Report on Drones - Average Pakistani Perspective

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
590 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Report on Drones - Average Pakistani Perspective
Pakistan is currently ranked 112 in 120 nation’s literacy rate scale globally. Being such low on this scale means that majority of population of Pakistan is illiterate. Illiterate people are more influenced from their emotion and think from their hearts.
Righteousness of drones depends on how we think. They are good against this war against terrorism, if one thinks from his mind and statistically. But they are bad if one thinks from his hearts and emotionally. So I think the ultimate reality is the perspective held by majority of people. So I don’t know what is right or what is wrong. I just tend to believe the ultimate reality or perspective held by majority of Pakistanis that drones are bad as they give rise to politics of fear, disgrace to humanity, an issue of national security, collateral damage and continues to produce more terrorists.
What I have learned across various media is that drones are visible to human eye. And when they fly in areas, locals can easily see them hovering on their heads. So I feel this give rise to politics of fear. So I think local feudal there continue to get support from people and exploits them also by promising them solution to their so called “fear”. Drone attacks also defy the basic right of human being. Everybody has a right, that if he is charged, he should be first accounted for blame by court. And after whole legal process, it should be decided that whether blame was right or wrong. I don’t know about inside facts. But what is portrayed, it seems like that America or Pakistan Army decides just upon their assumptions or some evidence that is still not countered by any court that whether person is right or wrong. They then upon their own deductions decides the faith of that terrorist or maybe so called terrorist. This I feel isn’t right. I mean by doing we are defying some of the basic right and that is a clear violation of human rights. No country under a democratic parliamentary system would allow some other country to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Increased security threats caused by heightened global terror activities, for instance, sectarian groups or Mexican drug empires, has prompted the development of decisive technologies, which will respond directly to the increased sophistication of these radical groups. A reliable technology is the Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) commonly known as a drone. The drone not only investigates a terror environment but also conducts aerial strikes. The commencing research will analyze in detail the positive impacts of the drone to homeland security.…

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Since the introduction of drones in war, the NY Times claims that the “CIA have not committed one civilian fatality, while allowing the troop death rate to decrease dramatically.” During the constant bettering of machinery throughout the world, the use of technology has come to a halt when it comes to an unmanned aerial vehicle. Slowly proving to be more reliable than the average pilot, in the years progressing new found respect has been shown by doubting militaries. In a HALE UAV article written by Carlos Reyes he states that “drones can fly up to 60,000 feet, being able to steadily winds at 15 mph compared to 50 mph winds at 40,000 feet.”(Reyes) and are able to outdo a pilot by almost 10,000 feet, due to the -75 degree weather. Portrayed by the US State Department as drones being useless, the use of drones has relentlessly grown to underestimated levels. A drone is classified as being “a UAV that is able to be controlled and sustain flight for numerous amounts of time, by a remote control”. The art of flying an attacking airplane remotely has made a strong peace appeal to not only the military but the citizens of the United States as well. By allowing the use of Drones in war time tactics, the innovation through this "technological leap" will help decrease in civilian deaths as well as increase in terrorist fatalities.…

    • 1885 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    CIA drone strikes have the potential to decimate terrorist organizations in an inexpensive manner and reduces boots on the ground combat for American soldiers. Though, we need expansive and additional congressional oversight of drone strikes and CIA targeting. The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI) is devoted to regulating and reviewing every aspect of the drone program, however, committee members are often met with denial and restriction of information. We need to make sure our drone program is met with regulation and preemptive strikes must be strictly reviewed in a legal manner prior to, in order to prevent the endangerment of innocent civilians, radicalization and mobilization of extremest retaliation, and to preserve the reputation…

    • 117 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drone Warfare, enacted by George Bush and expanded on by President Obama to provide a haven for Americans against the terrorist group, al-Qaeda. The use of weaponized unmanned surveillance drones allowed for far better independent targeting decisions, rather than retrieving intelligence from sources within the real country where the warfare would take place. These strategic implications created a question among Americans, is the use of drones to target individuals right? This question has arisen due to a high number of civilian casualties, making it seem inhumane to do. However, Kenneth Anderson provides readers a strong argument as to why drone warfare is strategically effective in his article, “The Case for Drones” with his organization pattern,…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ABstract Glass Castle

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages

    These drones are MQ-1 Predator UAV’s armed with Hellfire missiles. They were first used in 2001 from bases in Pakistan and Uzbekistan, aimed at high profile terrorist leaders. A benefit to using drones is that if they are shot down, there is no pilot to be captured and tortured. “Technology has been forever tilting the balance of battles since Goliath fell” Mark Bowden states in Killing Machines. This is proved true throughout all of history, you can have all the soldiers in the world but if your opposing country has a nuclear weapon then you stand no chance. Technology has brought us a long way in just the past 50 years. Something new is made or discovered every day in some country around the world.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the following “A Drone War Is Still a War” by Michael Kinsley speaks of the issue that using military drones causes civilian casualty and an unfair advantage. Kinsley addresses that we have already become used to the use of drones and that we treat the fact like a usual tactic of combat. The advantages of using drones is quite obvious. No American lives are put at risk, and the precision minimizes collateral damage, including the deaths of innocents who happen to be nearby. Kinsley states that the disadvantages are when a military option seems less painful, it is more likely to be resorted to. This makes it very easy for politicians such as President Barack Obama who are in favor of no troops on the ground to make a decision to use military drones.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In recent headlines a drone strike in North Waziristan (near the afghan border) killed sixteen Taliban militants. In a report later published by “Dawn” an English language newspaper in Pakistan the drone launched a second strike on the camp while rescuers were trying to save any survivors. While it is not known whether the rescuers were hostile or not the CIA launched the second missile and killed three of the search team members. This apparent collateral damage happened in the wake of CNN publishing an article on the recent decrease in civilian casualties during drone strikes. After hearing about this I researched the percentage of deaths (militant and civilian) in Pakistan, the number was eye opening a staggering sixteen percent of people killed during drone strikes in Pakistan were non-combatants. To me this means that the US and NATO have “murdered” hundreds of civilians for the “greater…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    They effectively state “The drone strikes are counterproductive because they gave rise to a desire, particularly among young men, to seek revenge for the drone strikes, thus radicalizing a new generation”. This statement shows how these drone attacks by the U.S. bring about a worse kind effect than any other, a rise in hatred towards the U.S. in the future leaders of Pakistan. Even if the hate from future generations establishes itself, the U.S. is doing what it believes is the best way to protect its people now and has stated plans to help Pakistan in the future in hope of reconciling the damages they are causing now. As Zeese and Flowers continue to describe the destruction that drones cause, eventually drones will be used more and more, causing their effectiveness to increase and eventually cause less destruction. Though the people of Pakistan would rather have less damage now, the damage caused by drones is very little in comparison to ground troops. In recent reports, many causalities and confrontations were caused by the U.S. troops and the many firefights with terrorists that pop out during their patrols. The drones on the other hand, cause less confrontation and can lead into less overall deaths in both civilians and troops…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    On April 12, 2016, the Coalition for Peace Action co-sponsored the Ethical, Moral, and Faith Implications of Drone Warfare conference at New Brunswick Theological Seminary. Alongside of the leadership by Robin Suydam, the Peace Coalition partnered with local Reformed Church in America congregations in order to bring attention to our Interfaith Network on Drone Warfare campaign. This event was highlighted by drone victims accounts as well as excerpts from leading drone warfare documentaries. The evening closed with a riveting speech by former army chaplain, Chris Antal.…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drone Home Analysis

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Drones are capable of being used by terrorists and other criminals for their bad intentions. For example, in the article “Drone Home” on page 7, Lev Grossman points out the possible security concerns revolving the domestic use of drones.…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First of all, drone strikes killed people. Accordingn to the wolrd widespread opposition to drone, more than half of people in every country disapprove the use of drone for attacks, this show how the public sentiment is strongly anti-drone. "Since September 11, 2001, over 95% of all non-battlefield targeted killings have been conducted by drone" as it stated in article #2, at this time you might think that people…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    These machines destroy many enemy camps that contain the Al-Qaeda in places such as Somalia and Afghanistan. Drones also “have done so at little financial cost, at no risk to U.S. forces, and with fewer civilian casualties than many alternative methods would have caused.” (Byman). In the face of the riots all around the nation, Obama has called the reduction in America’s reliance to these machines even though they will still remain the government’s main weapon of choice for international warfare. These machines have done the task of killing the main leaders of the terrorist organization that has haunted us for many years and have denied the life of many of their sanctuaries. Knowing that this information was spread around the world, the citizens of America became more accepting of keeping the production of this new technology alive and to make it as strong as ever. Although it has not been the most approved program the military could use, the biggest advantage is that it actually works and it is the most efficient program for terminating enemy troops that the military has ever invested billions of dollars for. Many politicians and regular civilians “think it fair to say that the targeted killing program has been the most precise and effective application of firepower in the history of armed conflict.” (Hayden). From this quote, the reality of war has brought upon the competition of seeing which country’s military can create the strongest weapon possible. Since Al-Qaeda has started the War on Terrorism with America, Obama and the government have worked for many months on created these drones to help reduce the risk of terrorists towards the civilians. According to Michael Lewis, Drones used for war is actually the most humane forms of warfare that could…

    • 1870 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drone Usage in America

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Drone use within the United Stated of America has been a very controversial topic of the recent times; therefore, this article is being written to say why drone usage has become so controversial in our country, and all over the world.…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Are drones worth using for military comprehension? Because of the fact that the United States are actually killing innocent civilians and composing terrorists in order to kill low-value threats (Drones-procon.org) For the most components, the benefits of these drones are not really benefiting such as using the money saved for the same use and eventually being associated with a potential war involving drones. So the answer is no, drones are only causing more havoc than they are helping and should not be…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Terrorists are human beings that commit terrible acts that in their own minds are justified. Their justifications vary from religion to their economical status to simply finding, “where they belong” within a terrorist organization. These justifications may not be accepted by the public eye; however, to a terrorist, the most important thing is to be able to justify his/her actions whether or not the reason for why they do what they do is accepted by others.…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays