Preview

Removing the Halal Logo from the Local Food Products Was the Right Decision Made by the All Ceylon Jameathul Ulema (Acju) Organization and the Buddhist Clerical Party of Sri Lanka?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1369 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Removing the Halal Logo from the Local Food Products Was the Right Decision Made by the All Ceylon Jameathul Ulema (Acju) Organization and the Buddhist Clerical Party of Sri Lanka?
“Sri Lanka becomes the only non-Muslim nation to have articulated the practicalities of Halal certification and to have amicably brought the chapter to a close allowing people to perhaps review and to reassess actions and behaviors detrimental to the main objective that being peaceful coexistence”(Indian Express Times). The removal of the Halal logo was the correct decision taken by the All Ceylon Jamiyaathul Ulama (ACJU) organization and the Buddhist Clerical party; firstly because Sri Lanka is a non-Muslim nation, secondly the Sri Lanka Jamiyaathul Ulama (SLJU) had been misleading Sri Lankan Muslim community about what’s Halal and Haram, thirdly ‘Laws of Shariah’ doesn’t state that every food product must be Halal, the fourthly because there was no way of verifying that the Halal certified companies are adhering the Islamic rules and finally because it was creating a communal rift between the Muslim and Buddhist communities in Sri Lanka.
In pre- colonial Sri Lanka the abuse and killing of animals was totally prohibited due to the "Maaghatha" rule. People lost rank and status if they were associated with killing of animals and consumption of meat particularly beefs. Sri Lanka is a non- Muslim nation, prior to 1505 Muslims could not have engaged in Halal slaughter it was with the entry of the Portuguese in the 16th century that legitimacy was granted to the killing of cattle and eating of beef. Buddhism provides advocacy for the moral rights of all sentient beings. No one is excluded. It is an inclusive religion that calls for compassion and ‘non–harm’ in our day to day dealings with others. It calls for peaceful co–existence between man and animal. 70 % of the nation is Buddhist and only less than 10% of the Sri Lankan population consists of Muslims. The minority (Muslims) has introduced a way of slaughtering animal for their requirement, meanwhile majorities (Buddhists) ‘one of main aspiration has been completely violated. Is it right to slaughter animals in a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    According to foreign affairs the want to protect animals is not a new concept to people. Chinese Taoist expressed that compassion for others should not be expressed solely to human beings. An Indian emperor decreed a law that was against the unnecessary mutilation and killing of animals. Buddhists believe that treating all living things with equal compassion as part of an ethical perception. Even though ancient societies had these philosophies, they seem to have been lost to modern society. The San Joaquin kit fox is a great example of how the growth of human population has dramatically impacted the depletion of another species.…

    • 140 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Buddhism is a religious group as depicted from the world’s history that began in the 6th century BCE, in today’s Northern India. Buddhism was founded by a wealthy man of Indian dysentery called Siddhartha Gautama. Siddhartha Gautama’s main concern was to teach people how to realize great spiritual development. These teachings focus on areas like tradition/customs, beliefs, ethics, meditation and philosophy and making people more enlightened; Buddha means ‘to awaken’. To the religious group boast of a huge following of about 300million across the world including 0.7 percent of U.S.A’s religious composition based on U.S’s Census Bureau Document (Seager, 2012).…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hindu’s belief in respecting all living creatures is due to many reasons, including the presence of Brahman, the close connection between humans and animals and the most basic principles of satya and ahimsa.…

    • 1287 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Testing Inaccurate

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Judaism also teaches that it is acceptable to harm or kill animals if that is the only way to fulfil an essential human…

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Fur And Ivory Trade Essay

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages

    They also believe in metta which states that loving kindness should extend to all living things, hence supporting the fur and ivory trade would be wrong because it does not tend to treat animals fairly and not cause harm. The Dhammapada states “All living things fear being put to death- let no one kill or cause others to kill”; this teaching emphasises how important it is for Buddhists to show respect to all living things as they believe in the cycle of rebirth so therefore they are against the fur and ivory trade because it causes animals to suffer under pain unnecessarily and…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hunters, however, will kill any animal whose head they would like to hang up on the wall, this includes large, healthy animals who are needed to keep the population strong. Even when unusual natural events cause overpopulation, natural processes work to maintain the group. Whilst starvation and disease can be tragic, they are nature’s ways of making sure that healthy, strong animals survive and preserve the strength of the rest of the species. Shooting an animal because he or she might starve or get sick is irrational and…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Laws in relation to animal welfare have been made and amended to restore justice and equality to the voiceless members of society. Before recent times, the rights of animals had been severely overlooked. Attention has been brought to breeding and slaughtering practices around the world through wide scale media. In such countries these processes fly under the radar and are rarely monitored, until now. This is when worldwide regulations have to be put in place to ensure that appropriate and adequate treatments are adhered to around the world.…

    • 2216 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    As one of those born in a human society and whose common sense was established by human education, I strongly believe that nobody has a right to kill other men. But if it is a universal truth, I would like to say that it is also the case with other animals because we are all given a life equally. However, it was after I got accustomed to the pleasure of eating meat and fish that I learned the animals’ lives are also precious.…

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Religion Death Penalty

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Hinduism: Hinduism is full of compassion and forgiveness. Leave aside human beings, they are supposed to be kind even to insects and animals. They are not supposed to kill a small insect. Therefore, taking the life of a human being is a very big issue. Their Hindu dharma is clear that use of violence against anyone is not allowed. Their scriptures supports the principle of nonviolence."…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Cruelty History Essay

    • 3392 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Concern for animal suffering is not a new or modern idea. Many read the ancient Hindu and Buddhist scriptures as advocating a vegetarian diet for ethical reasons. The ideology has evolved continuously over millennia, but many animal activists point…

    • 3392 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hinduism and Buddhism

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Non-violence is a concept accepted by Hinduism and Buddhism; however, cow has a high status in India Union. Both religions respect all creatures, since it is believe that the animal is another form of rebirth. Therefore, there are a large section of vegetarians.…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In many societies, ethical issues regarding the consumption of meat have arisen. These ethical objections are commonly divided into two categories: opposition to the act of killing in general, and opposition to certain agricultural practices surrounding the production of meat. Reasons for objecting to the practice of killing animals for consumption may range from animal rights, to environmental ethics, to religious reasons. Some people, while not vegetarians, refuse to eat the flesh of certain animals such as cats, dogs, horses, or rabbits due…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Ristia Sastra Mr. Rama Kurniadi Senior Thesis 27 May 2015 Humane Livestock Handling Animal Cruelty Everyday, animals are fighting for their lives in order to survive. A lot of them are beaten and kept in chains to complete human’s needs and wants. Some of them are confined to tiny cages so that humans can kill and eat them. They are tortured, mutilated, shot, burned, strangled, forced, poisoned, and cut up or skinned alive.…

    • 2979 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Example of Mla

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Looking at taboo in a modern society, Marvin Harris gives an interesting example of the application of cultural materialism to the Hindu taboo against eating beef (qtd. in McGrath).…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Importance of Ahimsa

    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ahimsa is a concept, which many consider important to the Hindu religion. The idea of ahimsa is to refrain from violence. Hindus perform this act “not only to humankind but also to the animal world,” (Brown, 25). The cow, for example, holds a place of holiness and inviolability; therefore, it receives special protection. The idea of ahimsa eliminates abuse and simple hurt and replaces it with compassion towards all living creatures. According to Hindus, all living creatures have a destiny in which they must fulfill. Killing a living creature interferes with its destiny and spiritual progression. Hindus believe “the act of killing is therefore a bad karma with unhappy consequences for those who indulge it,” (V, 2). Hindus believe the act of killing accompanies terrible consequences. They believe killing another living creature will bring them bad karma. This encourages the concept of nonviolence in the Hindu religion. Consequently, the ethical notion of ahimsa is beneficial to society as it expresses both compassionate behaviour and good karma.…

    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics