Preview

Reforms of Diocletian

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1277 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Reforms of Diocletian
"Discuss the reforms of Diocletian. What were they, why did he think they were necessary, what impact long and short range." Be sure to include comments regarding dominate, tetrarchy (not year of 4 emperors), edict of Prices (Bailkey Lim) and Xp (Christians). Diocletian affects greatly the modern world. End of antiquity was around 9th century.

Diocletian brought an end to the period popularly known to historians as the "Crisis of the Third Century" (235–284). He established an autocratic government and was responsible for laying the groundwork for the second phase of the Roman Empire, which is known variously as the "Dominate" (as opposed to the Principate instituted by Augustus), the "Tetrarchy", or simply the "Later Roman Empire". Diocletian 's reforms fundamentally changed the structure of imperial government and helped stabilize the empire economically and militarily, enabling it to remain essentially intact for another hundred years. splitting the Empire into two in order to be more manageable, creating a new system of Imperial succession, ruling as an autocrat and stripping away any remaining façade of republicanism, and economic reforms aimed at the problem of hyperinflation.
These arrangements, while awkward at times and followed more closely by some emperors than others, worked for the first two centuries of the empire 's existence. However, starting with the reign of Septimius Severus, rulers began to strip away or simply ignore many of the republican conventions, and reigned more as dictators than constitutional monarchs. This process undermined the office 's foundations and legitimacy. Diocletian recognized that the title had to be based on something more than simply military force, in order to be more recognized and stable. So he sought to build a new basis for imperial legitimacy in the state religion, with himself as semi-divine monarch and high priest.
Diocletian chose a new title for himself, calling himself Dominus et deus, or "Lord

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. In what aspects did Byzantium continue the patterns of the classical Roman Empire? In what ways did it diverge from those patterns?…

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Monarchy is defined as ‘a form of government with a monarch at the head’ and was the first arrangement of power in Rome after its founding by Romulus, who reigned from 753-715BC.1 However, by 510BC, the despotic actions of Tarquinius Superbus marked the end of a succession of increasingly tyrannical kings, and the ‘Roman Republic’ was established. This system was based on a sharing of power between, foremost, two consuls who were elected by the people and held office for only one year, then 300 senators, and two popular assemblies, the comitia curiata and the comitia centuriata. With such a spread of auctoritas, the Roman state would be at less risk from corrupt men with their aims set on an autocratic rule. The precepts of the Roman republic were honourable and upheld, in the most part, until the civil wars of 91BC onwards disturbed it, culminating in what many would consider the fall of the Republic, and thus the establishment of a monarchy, with Augustus at the battle of Actium on 2nd September 31BC.…

    • 1692 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Inflation and weak tax revenues were economic issues that confronted Diocletian and Constantine. They changed the way taxes could be paid by allowing citizens the option to pay with goods or money. Anyone who was involved in producing food was…

    • 236 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Caligula’s brief reign as princeps stripped away the illusion of the Augustan restoration of the republic and exposed the truth of the principate being nothing less than autocratic rule. His reign saw some significant historical changes in the imperial system. He ensured that upon his immediate accession his reign would not model that of his predecessor, a step that secured his popularity. His dutiful display of recovering his mother and brother’s ashes not only served out the purpose of securing the populace’s favour, but also his right to rule. However, Caligula’s behaviour spiralled out of control months later, contributing to the deterioration of his relationship with the senate and the Praetorian Guard, his embarkation of expansionism and change in provincial administration and causing some financial strain resulting from his lavish expenditure.…

    • 1392 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ‘Khrushchev fell from power because he failed to convince the party of the need to carry out fundamental reform in the USSR’…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Political aspects continued between the Roman and Byzantine Empire. The aspects that continued are the bureaucratic government and centralized political system with the emperor ruling everything. The Romans started this slightly during the reign of Julius Caesar, Caesar became a dictator and started this type of government in 47 B.C.E. after he was assassinated by his enemies. Julius’s grand-nephew Octavian Caesar rose up, defeated Julius’s enemies, and took over as the first emperor of Rome, renaming himself Augustus Caesar in 27 B.C.E. Augustus continued the type of government his uncle started where he as the emperor oversees all social, political, economic, religious, and military. The Byzantines took this cue from their predecessor and continued it by having such great emperors such as Justinian (527-656 C.E.) or Constantine (306-337 C.E.) who oversaw the whole Byzantine Empire and made decisions that allowed the empire to prosper. Another political aspect the Romans’ started was the standard of law which was continued by the Byzantines. Although the Byzantine Empire continued these political aspects of the Roman Empire, they changed some…

    • 265 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Prompt: Compare and contrast Greco-Roman and Judeo-Christian influence on democracy considering the role of the individual, government, and their contributions in a well written essay of 3-4 pages…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hamiltonia Swot Analysis

    • 1685 Words
    • 7 Pages

    More and more administrators were required to handle the empire’s affairs. In order to meet the…

    • 1685 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Between 100 CE and 600 CE, the Roman empire underwent a change in government as the empire collapsed due to corruption within. Also, the influence of Christianity increased greatly. However, the “Eastern Roman Empire”, the Byzantines, kept the culture going.…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How Did The Fall Of Rome

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I believe the splitting of the empire by Diocletian into two parts helped it survive for another 200 years because it separated Rome into two smaller parts allowing the halfs to develop on their own. In addition, it also made Rome easier to govern and allowing the West end to fall while the East survived and flourished. I also believe that the splitting led to more cultures developing including the language that dominated each part. This allowed both languages of Greek and Latin to exist until the crumbling of the West side which took Latin with it. If Rome had stayed together as one empire the large empire would have been too complex for one ruler to maintain on his own resulting in the early downfall of all of Rome. While, the Western end did crumble the Eastern stayed alive allowing the Roman empire to continue. However, this separation did have its negatives such as the Eastern half becoming more successful and wealthier than the Western.…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Oligarch's Death

    • 133 Words
    • 1 Page

    The oppresing leaders adhered to the common stereotype of bad leaders and killed anyone who opposed them.…

    • 133 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Transform the government and presidency \ Promote Democratic Republicans principle Louisiana Purchase \ expand the U.S. westward, doubled the size…

    • 758 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    established a strong central government that was designed to help the people and protect them.…

    • 718 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Byzantine Empire

    • 1823 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Several events from the 4th to 6th centuries mark the transitional period during which the Roman Empire 's east and west divided. In 285, the emperor Diocletian (r. 284–305) partitioned the Roman Empire 's administration into eastern and western halves. The borders of the Empire evolved significantly over its existence, as it went through several cycles of decline and recovery. During the reign of Justinian I (r. 527–565), the Empire reached its greatest extent after reconquering much of the historically Roman western Mediterranean coast, including north Africa, Italy, and Rome itself, which it held for two more centuries. During the reign of Maurice (r. 582–602), the Empire 's eastern frontier was expanded and the north stabilized. However, his assassination caused a two-decade-long war with Sassanid Persia which exhausted the Empire 's resources and contributed to major territorial losses during the Muslim conquests of the 7th century. In a matter of years the Empire lost its richest provinces, Egypt and Syria, to the Arabs.…

    • 1823 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mexican American

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo: treaty that conclude the war b/w U.s and Mexico. U.S wins and texas is now part of USA…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics