Preview

Reflection Paper

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
597 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Reflection Paper
Reflection #7
Ghost of Abu Ghraib Filmmaker Rory Kennedy takes us thru a firsthand accord of Abu-Ghraib, a prison where Saddam Hussein housed his prisoners but during the Iraqi war U.S soldiers took hold of this prison using it as their own prison for suspected terrorist and people they believed to be aiding terrorist. However what went on behind the walls of this prison was nothing less than admiral behavior, on the part of the soldiers. Prisoners were abused, humiliated and treated as if their lives had no value. Soldiers took pictures of the acts smiling and laughing near dead bodies and prisoners being subject to torture and degrading things. These photos leaked out and a scandal erupted, leaving the military personnel to take the blame alone and the government official’s branding them as “A few bad apples”. Rory’s “Ghost of Abu Ghraib” reveals the details of abuse towards the prisoners from the military personnel and also firsthand testimonies from prisoners themselves; also we see that the personnel were given order and the responsibility for what went on goes further up than just the military staff.
If in fact the scandal at Abu Ghraib was the result of “A few bad apples” and that the whole military was not like this, why was it that the military ordered anyone who fits the description taken in for interrogation, also could the terrorist who attacked the U.S be considered a few bad apples and we now can be considered terrorists to the Iraqi people because of what our military did to many of their innocent people. Before the photos came out the Pentagon and U.S military used euphemistic language to convince the American people that the people we are going after needed to be treated “Not as prisoners of war but unlawful combatants and “TECHNICALLY” unlawful combatants are not protected under the Geneva convention” which is a law which protects the American soldiers under this law if a soldier would be captured the parties will treat captures humanly

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unfortunate event occurred at Pink Vile when the Charlie Company was there. The Geneva Convention was clearly violated when captain Medina and Lt. Calley were giving orders to shoot innocent civilians. There was a year cover up of the My Lai Massacre in the time military forces were looking for excuses to justify their actions. Why was Lt. Calley the only one held accountable and was his punishment fair? Who should have been held accountable for the events that have happened at My Lai?…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    I believe the principles of entrapment (Wade, Travis, Garry 261) and situational attribution (Wade, Travis, Garry 263) apply in this case. I, personally, could not blindly comply, but it’s also situational. If I were in the military, I would have to comply or face a possible court martial. I don’t see a correlation between college students being paid to play prison guards (who are taking on an authoritative persona in a campus basement) to American soldiers guarding detainees at Abu Garaib during wartime, knowing that these said detainees more than likely want to kill Americans. U.S. soldiers take an oath to uphold the constitution and protect the homeland and its people. (US Army), whereas, civilians have a little more control over their personal decisions. After just recently having the experience of watching the movie American Sniper, Bradley Cooper’s portrayal of Chief Petty Officer Chris Kyle makes me somewhat empathetic to Sgt. Russell. I don’t agree with what Sgt. Russell did, however his mental state at the time was not in a good way. In a way, I connect his story more to Chris Kyle’s story. Simply, because that is along the lines of how Chris Kyle died. The college students that played the guards in the experiment were “given permission to create boredom, a sense of frustration, fear to some degree, and a notion of arbitrariness”…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    America 's Accountability to its Constitution and the Events at Abu Ghraib - ... While I agree that “severe” is a matter of perspective, what went on at Abu Ghraib, the depraved acts against Iraqis and humanity, were certainly torture. Trying to argue against that point would be somewhere on the order of arguing against gravity. The pictures speak for themselves (Unauthored). And also consider this: the woman who took the infamous Abu Ghraib photographs was “…convicted by a court-martial, in May of 2005, of conspiracy to maltreat prisoners, dereliction of duty, and maltreatment, and sentenced to six months in prison, a reduction in rank, and a bad-conduct discharge (Gourevitch).” So the debate of whether or not Abu Ghraib was torture seems…

    • 6771 Words
    • 28 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    It would be naïve to believe that the nearly 1.5 million servicemen and women move in unison to the newest official or unofficial DOD policy. This is particularly true when it relates to conduct in war. The effectiveness in which senior officers control the culture of their unit more directly affects how their subordinates conduct themselves in battle or interrogations. Thus, it was not only the words of policy makers that allowed systematic torture in Iraq, Afghanistan or Cuba. Instead, it resulted from the commander who subtly looked the other way while interrogations escalated into torture. Or from someone who wanted revenge for 9/11 and found it in the interrogation room. Finally, it occurred because someone gave the order to “Gitmoize” Abu Graib. These are the links of the torture chain where senior officers could have taken control. This is where military professionals failed.…

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This book talks about service members who tortured P.O.W’S of the war on terror. It also details how they take oaths to not torture prisoners of…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Guantanamo Bay Vs 9/11

    • 1651 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Instead of calling the alleged Taliban and Al-Qaeda detainees “prisoners of war”, the Bush administration called them “unlawful enemy combatants”. By doing so, the Bush administration denied the detainees all rights of prisoners of war under the Geneva Conventions. If the detainees at Guantanamo had prisoner of war status, they would be protected under the Third Geneva Convention against the inhumane treatment and the forceful extraction of information they faced in the detention camp. By interpreting the Third Geneva Convention in a literal manner, the Bush administration justified their decision to name the detainees at Guantanamo “unlawful enemy combatants”. According to the Bush administration and American lawyer John C. Yoo, because the Taliban was a “failed state”, its militia was not entitled to protection under the Conventions. In addition, because Taliban and al-Qaeda soldiers did not wear uniforms in combat they were not prisoners of…

    • 1651 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The stress of the situation plays a large part in how far someone is willing to go to break their moral values and the code of ethics. In 2003, these soldiers were still feeling the grief over the September 11, 2001 attacks. Some of the prisoners at Abu Ghraib were insurgents for…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When times that require the use of torture come to light, the media tends to give life to an already harsh experience. If a soldier needs to find out where his fellow soldiers were taken, there are ways to get this information out of the detainee. To some, the quickest way to do so is to bring the harshest aspects the…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    9/11 Justification

    • 1434 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The terrorist attacks of 11th September 2001 and the interventional events of the ‘War on Terror’ that followed are among the most controversial in U.S. political and moral history. An abyss of opinions involving the U.S. government, American public, responsible terrorists, historians, human rights activists and notable heads of intelligence agencies and the criminal justice system amalgamate to create a labyrinth of varied perspectives towards both the presumed causes of 9/11 and whether the U.S. government’s War on Terror intervention was justified.…

    • 1434 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “The Truth about Torture,” Charles Krauthammer critically analyzes the John McCain, an individual with tremendous moral influence who was tortured by the North Vietnamese, amendment. This amendment would prohibit all forms of torture from being executed on war prisoners of America. In response, Krauthammer states that in certain scenarios, torture is not “just permissible, but also morally required.” He divides the war prisoners into the following three classifications: ordinary soldiers arrested on the battlefield, captured terrorists, and finally, terrorists who possess information. With regards to the ordinary soldiers, McCain’s amendment is justified because although these war prisoners are on the opposite side of the conflict, they are nonetheless lawful fighters who committed no crime. On the contrary, Krauthammer believes that the terrorists are not worthy of the same protection and privileges since they intend to harm innocent citizens.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reserch

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages

    After this case had occurred during the Bush administration it was called into question the actions of authority figures, John Brennan current chief of counterterrorism advisor is being promoted after allegations that Brennan "sat idly by as men were being tortured" (Prasow) should…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Abu Ghraib - Essay

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The prisoners of Abu Ghraib fell into three categories: common criminals; security detainees; and a small number of suspected important leaders of the insurgency against the coalition forces. A fifty-three-page report, not meant for public viewing, was released after a major investigation into the Army’s prison system. There had many numerous instances of sadistic, criminal abuses against the prisoners by a handful of U.S. military guards.…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Torturing Prisons

    • 1727 Words
    • 7 Pages

    "Torturing Prisoners in the War on Terror Is Never Justified."At Issue: How Should the United States Treat Prisoners in the War on Terror?. Lauri S. Friedman. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2005. Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center. Gale.…

    • 1727 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Getting Away with Torture

    • 7443 Words
    • 30 Pages

    undermined one of the most basic global standards governing how governments can treat people under their control. Contrary to the efforts of…

    • 7443 Words
    • 30 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Persuasive Argument

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “In July 2003, about 680 alleged Taliban members and suspected Al-Qaeda terrorists from 42 different countries were incarcerated in Guantanamo Bay. On July 23, 2003, U.S. Major General Geoffrey Miller said that three-quarters of the roughly 660 detainees had confessed to some involvement in terrorism. Many have informed about friends and colleagues”. For the unknowing, “Guantanamo Bay detainment camp serves as a joint military prison and interrogation camp under the leadership of Joint Task Force Guantanamo (also known as GTMO) and has occupied a portion of the United States Navy's base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba since 2002. The prison holds people suspected by the executive branch of the U.S. government of being al-Qaeda and Taliban operatives, as well as those no longer considered suspects who are being held pending relocation elsewhere”. Guantanamo Bay has received a large deal of criticism from law and human rights advocates alike. Law advocates believe the prisoners have not been afforded the rights of due process. They believe they are being held illegally and at a minimum, should be afforded the right to a trial. Human rights advocates believe the prisoners have been mistreated and tortured and that these misfortunes have led to several hunger strikes and suicides within the prison.…

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays