The U.S. Constitution was a milestone in our countries history. While it is fully integrated into our society today at the time it was written it was incredibly controversial. Its ratification was precluded by many arguments about whether it was a good fit for our country. The Constitution of the United States was fiercely debated; states rights were a hot topic, while economics and individual rights were the most controversial.
Whether the Constitution was needed to tie the states together or whether it gave to much power to the federal government was intensely discussed. In a letter written by George Washington to John Jay, Washington discusses how the Articles of Confederation did not have a strong enough central government and how the States would never come to an agreement. In his opinion a stronger central government was needed for anything to ever get done. Another group of people who shared this view was the Federalists led by Alexander Hamilton. Hamilton and the Federalists were strong supporters of the Constitution and fought for its ratification, they believed that a central government was needed to preserve the Union. However on the flip side of this there were the Anti-Federalists with Thomas Jefferson and Patrick Henry. In a speech given by Patrick Henry he argued that a Constitution would take the states independence away from them. This was a common view for the Anti-Federalists whose arguments stemmed from the fact that they had just fought a war to free themselves from tyranny and they did not want to destroy the work of the Revolution
Some U.S. citizens wanted the Constitution to help regulate and relive economic pressure while others perceived it as a way for congress to make themselves rich. The Massachusetts Sentinel, a Massachusetts based newspaper, made a point of saying how poor the economy was doing and how it needed a protecting federal government. This was a very Federalist view with which Hamilton agreed. He published his Report...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document