Part one questions:
Treitschke relationship with the state and the individual was depending on the individual and how strong they are is how strong the nation could be. He also acclaimed that militarism, authoritarianism, and war was the path that their nation of Germany would become powerful, and without the people within that nation none of what he sought out could be done. Meaning that the relationship with the nation and individual is very strong and connected. 2.
He says that a monarchy is superior to that of a democracy because in a democracy the leader cannot decide what he wants to do because he has to go through a series of events and see if what he wants could be done. But in a monarchy you are the leader of the nation and if you decide to go to war in a week there is no one to stop you because you are the head of the nation and you decide what to do. 3.
Some qualities that set Germany apart from the English and Jews was that the Germans were very demanding in the category of sports and always placing first, and thee Jews helped the Germans with the distribution with money and counting it, but the Germans did not need them after they knew what to do. 4.
He believed that nations had a contribution on human progress but none of it would have been possible if it wasn’t for, authoritarianism, militarism, and war. Without those attributes the nations of Europe could of never expanded, and sought out progress in the world. 5.
War was a much valuable thing for Treitschke, without it you could not expand and the nation would not progress, and become a well recognized nation. He also said that war could not move on without war because of the competition that exists between humans.
Part two questions:
According to Ferry trade over seas has become popular and nations are trading via sea. Therefore France needs colonies where ships can enter and where French ships can refuel with coal for long trades. 2.
His critics told him that why...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document