The purpose of this paper is to critique of a qualitative research article written by Janey Peterson (2010) entitled: Living with Heart Disease After Angioplasty: A Qualitative Study of Patients Who have Been Successful or Unsuccessful in Multiple Behavior Change. Peterson presents a 12 month study where she observed and interviewed 61 patients three years post angioplasty. Introduction
In her article Living with Heart Disease After Angioplasty: A Qualitative Study of Patients Who have Been Successful or Unsuccessful in Multiple Behavior Change, Janey Peterson (2010) documents the attitude, beliefs and values of a cultural and demographically diverse group of patients. This study focused on how healthy behavior changes can change patient outcomes. This area of nursing is important, relevant and of interest to making improvements in patients outcome after a heart disease diagnosis. In 2008, over 16 million people are diagnosed with coronary heart disease at an estimated cost of $156 billion (Peterson, 2010). Nurses must continue to develop strategies to bring these numbers down. Several studies have indicated that knowledge defect is the culprit of the lack of behavior change with heart disease patients (Peterson, 2010). Several themes surface from data that was collected from subjects. These themes are discussed during the interviews. The themes are evolving and allow the researcher to create a hypothesis. The grounded theory was used to show that positive patient outcomes can be achieved with education. What can nurses do to enhance the education process for heart disease patients? Review of the Literature
As a qualitative study, this study involved a wealth of background information from a previous research study entitled: The Parent Study: Healthy Behavior Trial. This study involved 660 patients who underwent urgent stinting. After signing a written informed consent the subjects enrolled within one month of...