Through G-d’s work, the world we live in was created both spiritually and physically. However, it is very possible to intertwine the two in many different ways, even though they are completely separate entities. Regarding committing an act of murder, it is explicitly stated in the Ten Commandments not to murder, as well as being one of the three prohibitions that cannot be perpetrated even if one is being forced to commit the action via their own life being laid on the line. To be more specific, does the term “murder” pop up when one is dealing with a case concerning pulling the plug on a loved one?
Nowadays, with advanced medicine and a high standard of living, the human race has pushed death to the outer reaches of our consciousness, and we are caught completely off guard when death arrives abruptly. When certain life threatening illnesses occur, such as comatose, the option of life support becomes available to the patient in need of it. Life support is the maintenance of the vital functions of a critically ill or comatose person or a person undergoing surgery. In most cases when life support is in use, the patient is suffering and lives in a vegetative state for an unknown amount of time. Doctors are able to do tests that enable them to know if life support will bring the person back to life, or if it will not. This causes the famous question to rise: Should the plug be pulled?
With the knowledge of the test results, doctors make it a clear-cut case. They present the facts to patient’s families and advise them accordingly. The families usually listen to the doctors’ recommendation even when the suggestion is to pull the plug. This is because it costs a tremendous amount of money to keep their loved one alive, and the suffering the patient is enduring becomes pointless if there is no hope in the patient ever regaining consciousness and ultimately coming back to life. However, when it comes to Jewish medical ethics, there is an endless amount of possibilities.
Even though the doctors’ advice is to pull the plug, many Rabbis may advise against it. According to many Orthodox Rabbis, a moral dilemma is now taking place. On one hand, pulling the plug will benefit the patient as well as the patient’s family. Pulling the plug will benefit the patient because it will put an end to his or hers endless suffering, and it will benefit the patient’s family by allowing them to not have to spend an enormous amount of money for nothing as well as allowing them say goodbye as opposed to stretching it out for however long the patient remains in a vegetative state. On the other hand, pulling the plug would be considered cold-blooded murder. Although the patient is predicted to die, a miracle could occur. We humans do not control the world. We do not have the power to decide who lives and who dies, and we for sure do not have the power to decide when someone deserves to die. Another point many Orthodox Rabbis make is that every human being is put on this world for a certain amount of time. Each human being is given their time according to G-d’s will and not a random human’s will. We as mere mortals have no right to decide when another person’s life is over, and if someone does decide, and acts upon their decision, they have just committed one of the biggest prohibitions out there.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
The case study goes as such: Mr. Martinez was a seventy-five year old COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) patient. He was in the hospital because of an upper respiratory tract infection. He and his wife had already requested that CPR should not be performed if he required it and a DNR is placed in his charts. While in his room on third floor, being maintained with antibiotics, fluids, and oxygen and seemed to be doing better. However, Mr. Martinez’s oxygen was inadvertently turned up, causing him to go into respiratory failure. This scenario in my opinion causes for drastic measures and I personally feel like his wishes should be overthrown by what the caring physician sees ethically and morally right. The doctor should look at all the circumstances in front of themselves and make an ethical decision. Mr. Martinez was previously being treated and had been improving. Although some may argue that he already has a disease that could be terminal. Looking at the bigger picture of the situation that he was being treated for the upper respiratory infection and he was progressing. I believe he should be transferred to intensive care so that his oxygen level can be monitored and his respiratory failure be treated by a ventilator.…
- 541 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
I think that the respect of patient's autonomy in today's policy and values is sufficient enough. In Dax's case, there were less respect of patient's autonomy relative to today's world where people say "do what you do" is more common and more respected. I think that there will always be a clash between family members, doctors, and the patients themselves. I, a person who has an Asian background, probably had the typical problem with dying family, specifically my grandfather. My grandfather was in hospital for months and the hospital bill just keeps mounting. So, my grandfather decided to go home and just take the necessary medications until he died soon after he got out of the hospital. But, my grandmother and mother did not want him to go…
- 219 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
The morals involved here is the patient’s right to refuse care if she chooses and also the right to die. The moral principles of ethics involved also in this case are: Beneficence- act of doing good, demonstrating kindness, showing compassion, and helping others; Non-maleficence- avoiding the infliction of harm; Justice- the duty to be fair in the distribution of risks and benefits, and; Autonomy- recognizing an individual’s right to make his or her own decisions.…
- 785 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
If I had a family member in a similar situation, I would have made the decision to discontinue all life sustaining measures the moment that I knew that there was no brain activity and no chance of recovery. I believe that it is cruel to keep a person alive when there is no hope of…
- 466 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Patient Preferences: The patient has not been involved in the decisions regarding her current treatment, and did not have a DNR in place or an advance directive in place regarding situations such as this. The family who had been acting as surrogates, were ready to stop treatment and place a DNR based on the prognosis given about the patient. As of now no one has fully assessed the patient's decision making capacity or asked the patient about her preferences, despite her regaining consciousness and her improved mental state.…
- 515 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
This article present a case in which the patient and the family made a decision in favor of resuscitation that ran contrary to the physician’s medical judgement. The author argues that, where a patient request for treatment in conflict with physician’s responsibility to provide what he or she believes to be good medical care, a resort to autonomy alone is insufficient. The principal of autonomy, which allow patient to refuse any procedure or choose among different beneficial treatment, does not allow them to demand nonbeneficial and potentially harmful procedure. This is important because CPR should not be considered an alternative to be offered by physicians in such cases. Instead, the physician should have listened to the patient’s hopes and fears, reassured him that the physician should would continue to be there and provide appropriate therapy, and, if necessary, refer the patient to psychiatric personnel or clergy.…
- 547 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Their loved ones cannot make that decision for themselves, so the doctors must ask the families what they want to do. This is a horrible time for the families, because no one wants to be the one to make that decision. The families are ignoring their loved ones wishes on not wanting to be put on life support, and they are holding on to the hope that they will get better. The families have trouble understanding that if they do get better, their loved ones will not always be the same person they were before. They may be worse, and must live on machines for the rest of their lives.…
- 719 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Recently I have face an ethical dilemma in caring for an patient whos family did not wish to conform to medical recommendations that were advised by physicians of the hospital that I work at. My Following diagnostic imaging she was noted to have a perforated bowel. The patient was confused at this point and could not make her own medical decisions. She had signed a DNR/DNI and her family chose to not perform surgery. The patient was clearly in need of intervention or death was eminent. Her family was adamant rear. This presented a moral dillememma…
- 275 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Life support refers to the emergency treatments and techniques performed in an emergency situation in order to support life after the failure of one or more vital organs. A patient requires life support when one or more vital organs fail, due to causes such as trauma, infection, cancer, heart attack, or chronic disease. Among the purposes of life support are: establishing and maintaining the ABC's of resuscitation (airway, breathing, and circulation), restoring the patient's homeostasis (the internal chemical and physiological balance of the body), and protecting the patient from complications of the underlying disease and its treatment (Morris, Stacey). Treatments of life support include: oxygen, intravenous (IV) fluids with sugar and salts,…
- 145 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
The simple principles of medical ethics are “to avoid harm”, “to do well”, “the right to act freely”, and “acting fairly towards the patient”. Doctors should try to save patient’s life instead of ending it. They have the responsibility not to kill the trusting patients, but give all their best to secure the life of their patients. Even if the patients are hard to cure, they should still try and not make euthanasia an option. Therefore, doctors do not have the right to decide whether their patients would live or die as long as their patients are alive, there is always a hope for curing. For instance, many European countries are legalizing euthanasia. Unfortunately, not only doctors, but also nurses are favoring euthanasia in the extreme…
- 616 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
There is always a choice of physician-assisted suicide if the patient is breathing and of sound mind. Moreover, a patient having a less than ten percent chance of living, physician-assisted suicide should be an option. Physicians are healers of disease and injury, preservers of life, and relievers of suffering. Determining the ethical responsibilities of physicians when patients wish to die requires a close examination of the doctor’s role in society (JAMA, 1992-vol 267, No. 16).…
- 1012 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
In several non-Western cultures, family members and community authorities may make decisions regarding medical care of an individual. Often, it may be inappropriate to discuss the diagnosis or prognosis with the patient.…
- 1397 Words
- 6 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Nobody wants to die, but death is an inevitable and complex phenomena. To say goodbye to loved one is always difficult. In some cases, it is harder when death comes sooner than later by some serious diagnosis. I think the most important point that a health-care professional needs to consider on the subject of death, dying or grieving is to respect the wishes of patients and families. Health-care professionals should provide training and education about death, dying, and bereavement to the families. Also, healthcare providers should be familiar with the ethics and cultures of the patients and families which they belong to. Death, dying or grieving processes can be culturally or traditionally different among patients. “Some physicians can keep…
- 254 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Death is a touchy subject. People pretend it is something that does not happen and refuse to talk about or address it. I am an ICU nurse. I have been for six years. I have dealt with plenty of death, in my own way. Death is a part of life. Whether it is something that is expected or not, it is our destiny. Having dealt with the suicide of my son’s father at a young age, death is something most of us avoid or do not expect. One is never prepared for it. Some refuse to accept it and move forward.Whether it is a loved one battling cancer for multiple years or a sudden suicide/death, it is never acceptable. Working in the ICU, I have seen many a prolonged death. Family members are never prepared for the death of a loved one. Whether or not my patient is ready to move on, family will do everything possible to prolong the death in hopes that the patient’s condition will improve or a “new” cure will save their lives. I have gone through spending an hour resuscitating a 20 year old with severe congestive heart failure to taking my time resuscitating a 98 year old riddled with cancer. Regardless of my beliefs, it is never easy for family members to accept their loved ones are no longer among us. I have mixed views about death regarding a person battling cancer. Many a times I have had a patient who is a “full code,” all life saving efforts to be attempted, that has metastasis of cancer to their liver, brain, and bones requesting all life saving efforts. In the medical community, we know life saving efforts are futile. The patient is in so much pain they can hardly stand it. They have no quality of life. Family members are hopeful that some medication will take effect and the cancer will disappear. But, by law, we are to make every effort possible at resuscitation. If a person has a good prognosis in surviving cancer, every effort should be made to prolong the person’s life. If the cancer has metastized and is now affecting other organs, brain, bone…
- 3543 Words
- 15 Pages
Better Essays -
There are five guidelines in selecting which principle to follow in cases that are hard to make a determination (Tong, 2007, p. 31). The first is that there are better reasons that can be offered to act on the overriding norm than on the infringed norm (Tong, 2007, p. 31). In the case of the Armando Dimas the initial assumption and conclusion of the neurosurgeon on call was the patient “should be dead” (Tong, 2007, p. 31). The immediate assumption and decision of hospital authorities had already listed the patient as a potential organ donor, based on the neurosurgeons preliminary examination.…
- 1133 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays