Public Policing Versus Private Security

Only available on StudyMode
  • Download(s) : 458
  • Published : February 6, 2011
Open Document
Text Preview
Public Policing Versus Private Security
Peter g.
CJA/500
January 30, 2011
Patrick Cote

Public Policing Versus Private Security

The existence of security in the world brought happiness to mankind because men choose pleasure over pain (Ortmeier, 2008, p. 4.).However, without some measures of security man would not live in peace and the war of all against all (crime) would inundate the entire world. Public policing and private security have several distinct differences. Public policing is the ability to enforce the law and maintain order in society. Private securities are paid agencies that perform the protective and loss-prevention duties not handled by police officers. Equally important, public policing and private security offers the same services and duties. These services and duties are performed to achieve the same goal. However, both serve as leaders in their line of work, and the leadership requirements are regulated by two different standards (Ortmeier, 2008, p. 23). They both share a positive relationship with the criminal justice system. This relationship could be enhanced if the two would partnership with one another. This could help them combine their essential policies for the current role they perform. Public policing and private security will continue to grow and work together for the interest of the criminal justice system. In this paper will compare and contrast the roles of private security and public policing, the differences between the leadership roles, their connection with the criminal justice systems. The paper will also cover the essential policies for public policing and private security, and the description of a comprehensive security plan, and its key components. Public policing is the ability to enforce the law and maintain order in society. Private securities are paid agencies that perform the protective and loss-prevention duties not handled by police officers. Black water U. S. A is an example of private security agency. They are privately owned and operated by the owner but maintain law and order and prevent losses from their enterprise. Public policing and private security have several distinct differences. Public policing does the following: maintain order, performs community service, detect crime, handle crime, and prevent crime. They also control traffic, conduct interrogations, and apprehend an individual criminal. And, the following are private security duties and responsibilities: serves as special aid to VIPS, patrol housing and business areas, serves as guards at gates, transport valuables, screening of personnel for employment, monitor surveillance cameras. They also serve as security consultation, install alarm systems, and offer private security vaults. Public policing and private security offers some of the same services and duties. These services and duties are performed to achieve some of the same goals. In this way they are able to assist each other in performing these services and duties. Public policing and private security offer the following services and duties: crime prevention, crime control, assist is emergencies, conduct searches, involved in community events, offer security, monitor, and provides protection and 10) they both have legal powers to protect lives and properties. In addition, both public policing and private security agencies are held accountable for their actions. Neither escapes criticisms from outside sources. Our society needs the services and duties that both provide to help ensure the safety of our freedom and property (Walker, & Katz, 2011). The difference between public policing and private security leadership roles are the standard requirements for leadership. The requirement for leadership in public policing is regulated by the government and civil service; some can be motivated by higher education in the related field, and some are politically...
tracking img