Preview

Prolonging Life

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
399 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Prolonging Life
Prolonging Life 1
Running head: PROLONGING LIFE

Prolonging Life
Lilliana Garzon
Florida Technical College

Prolonging Life 2
Abstract
This term paper will discuss Prolonging Life, death & dying, patients and their families as well as the removal of life support. This paper is also discussing the pros and cons, the debates.

Prolonging Life 3 Prolonging Life is one of the debates we have had for centuries. Even when doctors say it is enough families still fight to prolong life. Death has ceases to be a private struggle but has rather become a public affair involving teams of physicians. Theirs is many different medical ethical issues involving prolonging life. For years families and hospitals have fought on how to treat critically ill patients. Some families fight to keep their loved ones alive and on life support, while some doctors well suggest other wise; and sometime it is also the other way around. Life support technology has advanced, allowing physicians to prolong lives in circumstances that were not possible before. However, Family members and legal proxies well be called to make a decision for those patients who aren’t able to speak or for those who are in a coma. Therefore emotional and ethical confusion often cloud the decision-makers mind and heart in these circumstances. Consider this scenario: An elderly woman of the age of 67 decided to write out her living well in which she clearly states she does not want to be resuscitated or be put on life support. Three days later she was rushed to the hospital for a critical heart attack which put her in a coma. There was nothing the doctors could do and was put on a ventilator. Her husband refused to take her of life support even when he knew about her living well. The doctors decided to give him some time to grieve and think about it. Three days passed with no hope of recovery for the elderly women and the doctors tried to approach the husband once again about his wife’s condition. He
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dnr's Are They Wrong or Right?
    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Dnr's Are They Wrong or Right?

    The case study goes as such: Mr. Martinez was a seventy-five year old COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) patient. He was in the hospital because of an upper respiratory tract infection. He and his wife had already requested that CPR should not be performed if he required it and a DNR is placed in his charts. While in his room on third floor, being maintained with antibiotics, fluids, and oxygen and seemed to be doing better. However, Mr. Martinez’s oxygen was inadvertently turned up, causing him to go into respiratory failure. This scenario in my opinion causes for drastic measures and I personally feel like his wishes should be overthrown by what the caring physician sees ethically and morally right. The doctor should look at all the circumstances in front of themselves and make an ethical decision. Mr. Martinez was previously being treated and had been improving. Although some may argue that he already has a disease that could be terminal. Looking at the bigger picture of the situation that he was being treated for the upper respiratory infection and he was progressing. I believe he should be transferred to intensive care so that his oxygen level can be monitored and his respiratory failure be treated by a ventilator.…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Dnr Ethical Dilemmas
    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Dnr Ethical Dilemmas

    Patient Preferences: The patient has not been involved in the decisions regarding her current treatment, and did not have a DNR in place or an advance directive in place regarding situations such as this. The family who had been acting as surrogates, were ready to stop treatment and place a DNR based on the prognosis given about the patient. As of now no one has fully assessed the patient's decision making capacity or asked the patient about her preferences, despite her regaining consciousness and her improved mental state.…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Annotated Bibliography Resuscitation
    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Annotated Bibliography Resuscitation

    This article present a case in which the patient and the family made a decision in favor of resuscitation that ran contrary to the physician’s medical judgement. The author argues that, where a patient request for treatment in conflict with physician’s responsibility to provide what he or she believes to be good medical care, a resort to autonomy alone is insufficient. The principal of autonomy, which allow patient to refuse any procedure or choose among different beneficial treatment, does not allow them to demand nonbeneficial and potentially harmful procedure. This is important because CPR should not be considered an alternative to be offered by physicians in such cases. Instead, the physician should have listened to the patient’s hopes and fears, reassured him that the physician should would continue to be there and provide appropriate therapy, and, if necessary, refer the patient to psychiatric personnel or clergy.…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Terri Schiavo Case
    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Terri Schiavo Case

    Recent cases have drawn attention to the issue of individual autonomy, and what is sometimes referred to as ‘the right to die’. Adult patients who are mentally competent have the right to refuse medical treatment even when that refusal can lead to worsening ill health and even death. This refusal of treatment may only be ignored when statutory law provides for treatment without consent, or a judge makes an order that overrides the patient’s consent. While this is largely accepted when patients are physically and mentally competent, it becomes a complex issue when a person is mentally competent, but due to physical incapacity are in care because they are unable to care for themselves. A person may be mentally competent but due to being a quadriplegic…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Public Services Ethical Analysis
    • 1920 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Public Services Ethical Analysis

    This group is faced with new ethical dilemmas everyday whether that be regarding the treatment which patients decide to have or those which relate to the withdrawing of life saving care.…

    • 1920 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Minnesota Nurse Practice Act
    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Minnesota Nurse Practice Act

    The ANA Nursing Code of Ethics applies to this case study in that it addresses ethical responsibilities and the nurse’s role in advocating for the patient. Section 1.4 of The Code of Ethics for nurses is the right to self-determination and applies to this scenario. This code should impact the nurse in his or her profession decision when caring for this patient. The code of ethics should serve as a guide to the nurse in this scenario empowering the nurse to use the knowledge that the patient had previously set forth in legal documents to discuss with the physician, the legal and moral obligations of the healthcare team in regards to this patient’s treatment plan. The Code of Ethics provides a basis for the nurse to guide his or her practice and support of the patient. It would be unethical for the doctor to place this patient on a ventilator. The patient took steps to ensure that future healthcare decisions would be addressed in the event that he could not make his own decisions. This legal document not only specified Mr. E’s wishes, but also included a durable power of attorney to make decisions for him in the event that he was unable to do so himself. By placing Mr. E on a ventilator,…

    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Compare And Contrast Uniform Declaration Of Death Vs Medical Death
    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Uniform Declaration Of Death Vs Medical Death

    New technological advances allow for patients to stay alive in situations that they normally could not survive. This causes an increasingly problematic conflict between medical and legal systems. The Uniform Declaration of Death Act allows for a somewhat reliable definition for death in both systems. However, some situations still challenge the universally accepted definition of death. Lia’s situation is a perfect example of how a medical definition of death conflicts with legal conditions. Lia’s complex medical situation showcases how death challenges both the medical and legal systems in America, making it very difficult to offer a concrete definition.…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Euthanasia
    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Euthanasia

    The simple principles of medical ethics are “to avoid harm”, “to do well”, “the right to act freely”, and “acting fairly towards the patient”. Doctors should try to save patient’s life instead of ending it. They have the responsibility not to kill the trusting patients, but give all their best to secure the life of their patients. Even if the patients are hard to cure, they should still try and not make euthanasia an option. Therefore, doctors do not have the right to decide whether their patients would live or die as long as their patients are alive, there is always a hope for curing. For instance, many European countries are legalizing euthanasia. Unfortunately, not only doctors, but also nurses are favoring euthanasia in the extreme…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Personhood: the Central Question in Medical Ethics
    • 1219 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Personhood: the Central Question in Medical Ethics

    A patient is lying on a hospital bed hooked up to several machines regulating his bodily functions. The doctor has informed the family that the patient is brain dead. His spouse makes the decision to pull the plug but his mother argues against it. It is the mothers opinion that her son is still alive, and deserves to be treated like a person, even though his brain is no longer functioning. The spouse holds the opinion that any trace of her loved one has left with the death of his brain and only his body remains. Suddenly, both remember the patients wishes to not be sustained on life support, and they collectively decide to pull the plug. This example illustrates the central debate in the ethics of medicine: What constitutes a person? Does the level of brain activity characterize an individual as a person? Is a persons body simply “on loan from the biomass”? The answers to these questions determine the outcome of every medical decision from Abortion to Euthanasia. An analysis of the main arguments arising in these controversial issues will serve to illustrate this point.…

    • 1219 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Clinical 1
    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Clinical 1

    A patient has a living will. The patient is in a serious accident and loses the ability to make and communicate healthcare decisions. The patient suffered brain damage and is permanently unconscious. How should decisions be made?…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Ethical Issues Of Prolonging Death
    • 113 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Ethical Issues Of Prolonging Death

    Death is an event, dying is a process. Modern medicine today works very hard to help people live longer and avoid that dreaded day when death comes. The healthcare system is prolonging life, but is it always the answer, forcing someone to continue a suffering life. Doctors sometimes unintentionally instill false hope in patients by offering treatment that most likely will not work or benefit the patient. Prolonging life has ethical and moral issues. Death is also a very taboo topic in our culture and should not be discussed or accepted. The doctors and pharmaceutical companies that are prolonging life do not fully understand the damage they are causing to society surrounding death.…

    • 113 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Right To Die Controversy
    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Right To Die Controversy

    Who are we to say when we should die? Are we trying to play God, or do we just want the right to end the inevitable a little sooner than God’s plan for us? This paper will discuss pros and cons of euthanasia with stories and research. Such as the case of a ninety five year old comma patient, whose family receives the news that she could live for months, years even in a vegetative state on life support; leaving the family questioning whether or not to pull the plug and put an end to what otherwise would be like the “death of a hundred deaths.”…

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Advanced Practing Nurse
    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Advanced Practing Nurse

    There are also patients who are not able to speak for themselves and do not have an advanced directive that can carry out the patient’s wishes. This is another major barrier that could mean life or death for a patient. An advanced directive is a legal document of the person who is to make the decisions for the patient’s end of life care. If there is no advanced directive, the decisions are made according to the state statue. The closest relative available may be appointed to make these decisions. As an APN we must encourage the patients and their families to prepare before these emergency situations occur (Hamric & Delgado, 2009).…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Arguments Against Euthanasia
    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Arguments Against Euthanasia

    Medical professionals already have many burdens throughout their medical path, adding the guilt of killing someone to the list is not fair for the healthcare professionals and the family members. Euthanasia is ethically and morally wrong because the doctors have to continue to find possible ways to treat the patient not to give the patient the option of choosing to die. The incident in “Britain with the nurses technically killing the patient could have been avoided” (Fenigsen, “Other People’s Lives: Reflections On Medicine, Ethics, And Euthanasia”). Although, some people might believe that ending the patient’s pain is ending their suffering, but many fail to realize the actual outcome if euthanasia were to be practiced. For instance, “If terminating life is a benefit, the reasoning goes, why should euthanasia be limited only to those who can give consent? Why need we ask for consent” (ProCon.org, “Top Ten Pros and Cons)”, the slippery slope a reality to…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Ethics Of Physician Assisted Suicide
    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Ethics Of Physician Assisted Suicide

    Some say that doctors main priority should be to help a patient and make sure they get better, not help them end their life. “They rightly seek to eliminate disease and alleviate pain and suffering. They may not, however, seek to eliminate the patient. Allowing doctors to assist in killing threatens to fundamentally corrupt the defining goal of the profession of medicine” (Anderson). While this article focuses on the cons of allowing PAS, it does not necessarily go against the idea of doctors helping their patients, because by allowing them this end of life option they are alleviating pain and suffering to their patients. And doctors are not allowed to offer PAS to any of their patients, so they are not forcing it upon them as an option, the patient must go to them and specifically request it in order to be administered the drugs. “Patients can refuse or doctors can withhold particular treatments that are useless or causing more harm than good. But in deciding that a treatment is useless, we must not decide that a patient is worthless” (Anderson). Patient happiness and health should always be a top priority, and sometimes that means stretching the limitations of the doctor code of conduct to get their patients what they really want, which could in some cases be…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics