Preview

Project Risk Management - Fluidity in Risk Planning Case Study

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1084 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Project Risk Management - Fluidity in Risk Planning Case Study
Risk Paper 2
Project Risk Management- Professor Hurst
Fluidity in Risk Planning – A Case Study
One of the most important steps within a project is risk management because it plans for and responds to risks that impact the overall project deliverables including budget and timeframe. Risk management is used to mitigate risk in ways that align with each individual risk and its potential impact. During the risk management process risks are identified and defined and a plan to control, monitor and eliminate them is created. Risks from all areas are brought up during these brainstorming sessions of the risk management planning phase and are planned for accordingly. The work breakdown structure of the project is used as a guide when compiling a risk matrix that will identify potential risks, their severity and impacts. The case study in chapter 13 reflects two different risk response strategies with regards to the tender review process of a project’s deliverables. The first phase of the case study aligns more closely with a thorough and effective risk planning process plan while the second phase builds on the baselines determined by the first phase to generate a more solid and final risk assessment that will continue to be fluid throughout the project. Risk management is a crucial step of the project planning stage that continuously evolves throughout the project. During phase one of the case study this stage is considered a high importance and value step thus resulting in the proper planning of the risks based of off the WBS. The objectives of phase one are clearly identified and the intention to identify major risks of the project, which will be used as a baseline when comparing each individual tender to the project’s risk outcomes, is clear and all major steps to do so are taken. Step one of the creating the tender phase one case study calls for the “project structure to be reviewed with the project manager and key staff” and creating “an agreed risk WBS”.



References: Cooper, D., Grey, S, Raymond, G., Walker, P. (2005). Project Risk Management Guidelines Managing Risk in Large Projects and Complex Procurements. West Sussex, England : Wiley and Sons.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Proj595 Risk Paper

    • 1690 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Managing Risks in Large Projects and Complex Procurements. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.…

    • 1690 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unit 6 Assignment 2

    • 878 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A closer look to the literature or project risk management standards will make the reader understand that depending on the author of the methodology, the name or the order of these sub-processes is different. Thus, risk identification and risk quantification are sometimes taken together and are called risk assessment or risk analysis; the risk response plan is sometimes met under the name of risk mitigation plan; the risk response plan and the risk control plan are sometimes taken together under the name of risk management plan.…

    • 878 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    * Recommendation: Better planning in order to incorporate the flow of personnel within the company.…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case 3 Risk Management

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The main factor for not completing the project is team failure which is because of poor overall initial planning. When there are unrealistic goals being set, creating a chaotic working environment there is bound to be nothing but pure failure of the project and its successin the near future. There can be two major causes for the team project failures; overdue or missed time standards, and going beyond set financial plans. With the interpretation of day to day basis risk assessments into team developed projects, there is a more realistic set of guidelines, and procedures put into place. The definition of a risk assessment states , “ that it is theidentification, evaluation, and estimation of the main levels of risks involved in a situation, their comparison against benchmarks or standards, and determination of an acceptable level of risk”. With set risk assessment techniques, the team may further eradicate all possible liabilities or future occurrences within the project team.…

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Risk Management Plan

    • 2116 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The Project Management Team will need a proactive approach in the management of risks and related uncertainty. Management of risks for this project will follow a continuous risk management model, refined as the PLC develops. Involvement of support from the business, technical, executive, and external partners is crucial to having a viable risk management process. Tasks will be evaluated and identified for the mitigation of risks; uncertainty of organizational environmental factors will be included in the evaluation of impact and probability, as appropriate. This will ensure that tracking of progress, or lack thereof, occurs and necessary resources are identified for corrective/mitigating actions planned.…

    • 2116 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Risk or threat is common and found in various fields of daily life and business. This concept of risk is found in various stages of development and execution of a project. Risks in a project can mean there is a chance that the project will result in total failure, increase of project costs, and an extension in project duration which means a great deal of setbacks for the company. The process of risk management is composed of identifying, assessing, mitigating, and managing the risks of the project. It is risk management that drives the decisions that may affect the development of the business capability and also the management of the project. . Issues differ from risks, as risks relate to the events that could be revealed or emerge and end up affecting the project's scope, budget, business performance, management objectives and schedule. Risks are measured in accordance to their most probable chance or chances of occurrence and the way that they can impact the program (Hillson & Simon, 2007). Risk can be defined as any kind of trepidation that could significantly impact the capability of the project to meet its scope, budget, change management, business performance objectives, and schedule.…

    • 1150 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Before developing a risk management plan an analysis of risk needs to be performed. This analysis should include all aspects of the project that may be part of an uncertain event or condition that may have a positive or negative effect on the project objectives and outcome. The overall goal is to work to address any type of risk before they become problematic. Analyzing and relaying the level and probability of the risk to the stakeholders, sponsors and project team can help in reducing mistakes that can be cause for project failures. Some common mistakes that can be overlooked when analyzing risk, is not understanding the benefits of a risk management plan, not allowing time for risk management, not properly identifying and assessing risk.…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Risk breakdown structure is the hierarchically organized depiction of the identified project risks arranged by risk category (PMI PMBOK). The RBS will prove extremely valuable to better grasp when a project needs to receive special scrutiny, in other words, when risk might happen. The RBS can help the project manager and the risk manager to better understand a recurring risks and concentrations of risks that could lead to issues that affect the status of the project. Following the concept of the Work breakdown Structures (WBS), the Risk Breakdown Structure provides a means for the project manager and risk manager to structure the risks being addressed or tracked.…

    • 1800 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The purpose of this paper is to provide for the application of project risk management theory to the case study concerning Flayton Electronics: Boss, I Think Someone Stole Our Customer Data. This will happen in four parts. In the portion of the paper we will look at some the Critical Success Factors of the business; address various factors concerning the project of recovering from the issue; develop some project risk recommendations and identify some of the initial risk categories that I see as present in the case study.…

    • 2381 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Risk assessment is the process to identify areas of concern so an efficient response and an effective recovery plan can be placed if needed. In order to assess the potential risks a trial can face and to create a plan, six steps could be used: 1) Identify all the required Functions and Processes in the project; 2) Rank these identified functions and processes according to their “criticality”; 3) Determine the required time for recovery so the critical functions and processes can be maintained; 4) Identify those threats that could severely impact these critical functions and processes; 5) Determine the vulnerability of each critical project function and process; and 6) Identify and plan,…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: Cooper, D., Grey, S., Raymond, G., and Walker, P. (2005) Monitoring and Review. Project Risk…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Unit 5006 Assignment

    • 2995 Words
    • 12 Pages

    “Any project has risks at the outset because of the many unknown factors, some of which you will remove during the planning stage. The risk could be due to internal or external factors. In practice risks disappear and new risks appear as the project progresses, so regularly review potential risks. Adopt the view that “anything that can go wrong will go wrong”” (Trevor L Young2003)…

    • 2995 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Galway, L. 2004. Quantitative Risk Analysis for Project Management, A Critical Review. Santa Monica: Rand Corporation. Available from: [Accessed 17 March 2011]…

    • 2598 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Exammyydj

    • 4844 Words
    • 20 Pages

    The Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT) is a network analysis technique which is used to estimate project duration when there is a high degree of uncertainty about the individual activity duration estimates (Schwalbe 2013). PERT is an ‘event-oriented’ technique which uses arrow diagram to identify critical activities that need to be completed in order to finish the project. Besides, PERT also uses statistical distribution to provide probabilistic estimate of project duration derived from three estimates listed below (Marchewka 2010). Optimistic estimate: the minimum possible…

    • 4844 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    IS3110 PP1T

    • 777 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The responsibility for managing risk is shared amongst all the stakeholders of the project. However, decision authority for selecting whether to proceed with mitigation strategies and implement contingency actions, especially those…

    • 777 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays