Below are a description of what a process and a content theory of motivation are, their features and how each applies to the workplace.
A process theory define motivation as a rational cognitive process occurring within the individual e.g. Adams’ Equity theory. While on the other hand, a content theory define motivation in terms of need satisfaction, e.g. Maslow’s Hierarchy of needs theory. Both of these theories defer in a significant way because each one recognises motivation and it features differently to the other.
The two main types of motivational theories, I will be discussing below are, Victor Vroom’s Expectancy theory which is a Process theory, its features and how it applies to the workplace. Further more, Clayton P. Alderfer’s ERG theory which on the other hand is a content theory, its features and how it also applies to the workplace.
According to Victor Vroom’s expectancy theory, motivation is “the strength of a tendency to act in a certain way depends on the strength of an expectation that the act will be followed by a given outcome and on the attractiveness of that outcome to the individual” (S. P. Robbins, Behaviour 9ed, p.171)
So in other words, by researching into motivational theories for my essay, not only will I benefit from it now, but I am likely to benefit from it in my future employment.
This theory also coincide with Alderfer ERG theory (Fincham and Rhodes, Organizational Behaviour, 3rd Edition), which emphasis that people who do not need to work, still do, due to what he describes as a chronic need. This is a motivational behaviour which leads to a long term goal being fulfilled. Putting these two theories in practice, a very rich person who craves for social need is likely to still be working, due to the knowledge that having a job is likely to satisfy their social need, as the opportunity for working in teams and meeting new colleagues will be of high interest to them.
The main features of Dr V. Vroom Expectancy theory are: Expectancy, Instrumentality, and Valence (Vroom, 1964). Dr Vroom believed that these features are instrumental to individual’s motivation and whether they are high performers or not.
According to Vroom, Expectancy is “the probability ranging from 0 to 1 that a particular action or effort on your part will lead to a particular first level outcome being” fulfilled (Armstrong & Dawson, p 96-97). This in actual context means that the level of effort I will contribute to a course or project, will be based on whether the return is of value to me and if yes, by how much?
However, I think that what Dr Vroom did not take into consideration with his theory, is team working. My main objection is that teams perform for the actual group, and so how can individuals measure their expectation (Expectancy)? And even if they could, it is likely that the performance of the group will be looked at as a whole, therefore rewards will also be distributed evenly. Lastly, will this mean that individuals will not contribute greatly within teams, and if that was the case, why are large multinational companies such as McDonald’s, Sema Group UK limited integrating their workforce into it?( from Past working experience)
Instrumentality on the other hand is when an individual believe that by performing, there is a high probability that a reward will be followed afterwards. This means that instrumentality is based on perception, because it is based on the individual’s thoughts.