Preview

Privatization of Russian Industries

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2294 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Privatization of Russian Industries
For some, the privatization of Russian industry has been one of the great success stories of Russia's painful economic transition: quick, firm and radical action was taken to shift the great bulk of Russian industry out of state hands, thereby laying the basis for a radical restructuring of enterprises and improvements in their performance. Others see privatization as a best a failure, at worst a catastrophe. Not surprisingly those opposed to the market and economic reform as a whole share this view. But many commentators who see themselves as supporters of reform find plenty in Russian privatization to criticize: the process led to the transfer of ownership to inappropriate people and as a consequence no beneficial restructuring of enterprises or the economy can be expected.

While this paper will attempt to cover the three key facets of privatization: that enterprises be transferred to private ownership; that the new owners be able de jure and de facto to exercise ownership rights; and, finally and ultimately most importantly, that the new owners exercise their ownership rights in such a way as to bring about improvements in enterprise performance. The key issues to be surveyed, therefore, are: who as a result of privatization obtained ownership of Russian industrial assets, and are they appropriate owners; can new owners, particularly if they are appropriate owners, exercise their ownership rights; and has privatization led to improvements in enterprise performance? The paper will deal with privatization only within the industrial sector; thereby ignoring the highly controversial privatization's of the last twelve months or so in the energy and utility sectors.

Who are the new owners?

Global data showing about 70% of GNP being produced in the private sector reflects the high levels of privatization of industrial enterprises, with the great bulk of enterprises having been privatized by mid-1994. However privatization does not necessarily mean the complete

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Russia economy in terms of industry fluctuated over the period from 1855-1964. It is key to note that under all the leaders, industrialisation and modernisation was always seen as an essential economic aim. Under Alexander II, with Reutern as his Minister of finance who adopted an approach that revolved around continued railway construction, attraction of foreign expertise and foreign investment capital. As a result modernisation and expansion occurred within the staples as well as newer industries which show the impact that alexander II made on industry. Reutern achieved a sevenfold increase in the amount of railway and the capacity of railway to carry break bulk at speed increased which gave a major boost to industrial output Russia seemed to be finally moving towards industrialisation and keeping up with the West. This approach was similar under Nicolas II who also managed to have a great impact on Russia’s industrial economy. This was through the work of Sergei Witte whom at the time of his appointment the Russian economy still resolved predominantly around agricultural production further showing that under Alexander II impacts was limited. Witte continued the idea of foreign expertise as well as taking out foreign loans, raising taxes and interest rates to boost available…

    • 2039 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The meaning of Privatization has been widely debated as the years progressed, however one idea scholastics and experts appear to concede to is; privatization is a relationship between a private- sector organization and an administration office with the end goal of finishing a venture that will benefit the pubic. Privatization relationships are the upfront of ideological, political and economic debates, they continue to be used as political tools to solve problems associated with increased demand for public services growing concerns with the size of government, and decreased opportunities for additional resources (MaNamara, Morris 2008). No one public private partnership is the same, each utilizing different arrangements and public management…

    • 211 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Russia underwent economic and political reform to a limited extent. Although Peter Stolypin was pushing for reform, he was undermined by the mindsets of peasants and the fundamental law.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tnk-Bp: Tread with Caution

    • 10654 Words
    • 43 Pages

    CASE DESCRIPTION The primary subject matter of this case concerns the management of international joint ventures. Secondary issues examined include: business in Russia; government’s intervention in business and how it affects multinational companies; market entry and modes of market entry decisions;; and dimensions and elements of culture (Fang 2003). The case has a difficulty level appropriate for first or second year graduate level. The case is designed to be taught in one class hour and is expected to require one hour of outside preparation by students. CASE SYNOPSIS BP, one of the largest publicly listed oil companies in the world, had been operating in Russia since 1997, initially through minority stakes in Russian oil companies and, since 2003, through TNK-BP, a 50-50 joint venture with AAR, a consortium of Russian investors. This joint venture allowed BP access to extensive oil reserves in Russia and was one of BP’s most valuable assets, accounting for 25% of BP’s production in 2007. In 2008, BP and its partners in TNK-BP encountered serious disagreements about how to run the company. A string of government actions including raids by the Russian tax police on both BP and TNK-BP’s offices in Russia concluded with the cancelation of TNK-BP’s British CEO’s work visa by Russian immigration authorities. Although BP and its partners reached an agreement in principle to renew the board of TNK-BP and appoint a new CEO in December 2008, by February 2009 they had not been able to appoint a Chief Executive acceptable to both parties. INTRODUCTION In May 2009 TNK-BP, a 50-50 joint venture between BP, one of the major western oil companies, and Alfa Access/Renova, a…

    • 10654 Words
    • 43 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    2006Gov Privatization Rprt

    • 10996 Words
    • 73 Pages

    Privatization 1 II. Forms of Privatization 1 III. Privatization around the World 3 IV. Reasons for Privatization 4…

    • 10996 Words
    • 73 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why the controversy? Privatisation is defined as the transfer of ownership rights in state-owned enterprises to the private sector. This type of activity has taken…

    • 158 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Post Soviet Privatization

    • 1165 Words
    • 5 Pages

    There were three schools of thought about what should be instated during the post soviet era and the beginning of privatization. The government had difficulty in choosing which would be the best, as each would have a complex effect on the economy of the former union.…

    • 1165 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Privatization is very popular in government and is making its way into more entities within the United States. It is a topic of research for scholars and it is a concern for some government employees. Privatization has two sides, a good side and a bad side. It puts fear in some people because they don’t want privatization to take over in certain places. People don’t want to lose their jobs when for profit companies take over. Others don’t feel they will get the best services because new employees will come into the picture that are not as efficient or knowledgeable. Other concerns are that individuals feel government or government assets should not be for sell or be controlled by a company.…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the time frame of 1917-1991, the country of Russia had a communist based economic system. Thus, meaning that its government possessed “the” full “control of” its “industry and of all the branches of production” done by its many businesses, and/or affiliates, even if they were not huge, and/or name branded (Document 3, #1). While it might have seemed like a good idea to have kept tabs on all of its businesses, the Russian government eventually ended up harming the aforementioned lower class industries. According to T.P Whitney, the writer of “The Russian Peasant Wars on…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Russia’s government and economic system underwent profound changes in the 20th century. With a monarchy that had been in power for more than two centuries, a lack of industrialization, and the advent of World War I, Russia’s time had come to evolve as a country. Over the course of two decades, Russia went from agricultural to industrial, and the new idea of communism was implemented. Communism is an economic system in which all business is government-owned and distributed evenly among citizens, and is vital to the understanding of Russia’s growth. The issue arises with respect to how, what, and why did Russia evolve and “progress” from an antiquated monarchy into its latest evolution, and what will Russia evolve into next?…

    • 1724 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Pettinger, T. (2011) “Advantages and Problems of Privatization”, Economics Help, 12th May. Available at: http://www.economicshelp.org/blog/501/economics/advantages-of-privatisation// (Accessed: 17 October 2014).…

    • 1607 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Communism In Russia

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages

    But so far the struggle for a post-Soviet identity has been a grandiose exercise in conflict and confusion (Gordon, ”Post”). Revealing that the struggle of a powerful government leaves their citizens confused and in distress. While Communism does not motivate the people of Russia, the economy is falling in production by 27 percent (Berger, “economy”). This is an issue that Vladimir Putin is trying to fix. Social and political reforms are created to enhance state and federal government lack of stability. Similarly, this issue does not only occur in Russia also in Communist North…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    2. Privatization: According to Alex Kozinski and Andrew Bentz, Privatization appears in two types that it is very simple to discuss it because it occurs like from the government to the private sector, or from the private sector to the…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Oleinik, Anton(2005) A distrustful Economy: An Inquiry into Foundations of the Russian Market. Journal of Economic Issues, 39,1:58-62…

    • 2594 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    To what extent did Russia undergo economic and political reform in the years 1906-14? (30 marks)…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays