Preview

Privatization Assignment

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1162 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Privatization Assignment
INDEX
Privatisation

Subject Page Number

Worksheet
Section 1 3
Section 2 3
Section 3 4
Section 4 5
Section 5 5

Analysis of article on privatisation 6

Bibliography 7

Privatisation

1. What is your understanding of privatisation?

Privatisation is the transfer of government resources and tasks to the private sector. This can include government assets, deregulation of industries, and outsourcing of government services and lastly, giving the consumer the option to purchase services on the open market with coupons or vouchers. (Hayden, 1997, pp.250-253)

2. Why would a country support Privatisation? What are the advantages of such a policy? And the disadvantages?

Privatisation can be used to restructure a troubled economy and stimulate productive use of recourses. Privatisation will protect private property rights and stimulate competition. Although the initial purpose of privatisation in South Africa was to enhance the free market system, recent developments emphasize the upliftment of disadvantaged communities. (Von Keyserlingk, C 1994)
Advantages of privatisation include:
Through privatisation companies earn more profits because of higher efficiency.
It enhances the free market system and reduces the public tax burden and through privatisation the government’s income base increases.
Allows members of the community to participate in the economical system. Lastly and especially in the South African context, the redistribution of wealth and upliftment of previously disadvantaged people remains one of the biggest advantages of privatisation. (Hayden, 1999, pp.250-253)

Disadvantages of privatisation include:
Government assets selected for privatisation are fixed and once sold the transaction is irreversible and the government loses control over its assets. Because of the private sectors endeavours of efficiency, unemployment can increase. Previous government employees



Bibliography: Haydam N E, 1997, Principles of Microeconomics, Van Schaick Publishers 2nd edition, Pretoria. Kitching K, 2005/2006, BML Programme, ENM 113, University of the Free State Press, Bloemfontein. Saayman, J N P 1989, Privatisering: Implikasies vir bestuur, Nagraadse Bestuurskool, Universiteit van Pretoria, Pretoria. Die Volksblad, 2002, “Telkom – Privatisering”, Die Volksblad, 3 Oktober, p.3. Beeld, 2007, “Slae vir Mittal”, Beeld, 28 Maart, p.16. Privatisation, [online]. Available from: http://www.bized.co.uk [2 April 2008] Von Keyserlingk, C 1994. Privatisering sal HOP en staatskas so help. Sake Beeld, 17 Julie.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Should SaskTel be privatized? (literature on public ownership, privatization, theories on the role of government)…

    • 2081 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    When government contract with private companies to perform what was once considered to be the traditional work of government, it is termed as privatisation. Privatisation is occurring at a rather impressive speed in United States. For example, there are over 100 privatised prisons in the country (Kissane, 2007). Other forms of privatisation occurring in United States include privatisation of schools, military plane maintenance, state welfare and employment agencies and hospitals. Privatisation has become a very controversial topic in the country due to its wide range of advantages and disadvantages.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First, I agree that privatization can be seen as a cure for bad government, though the term bad may not be the finest adjective, I would instead use inefficient or ineffective. According to lecture one, government failure is a primary rationale for municipalities to contract out, not because it’s a bad government, but because they were ineffective or inefficient from multiples reasons (Smith, Lecture 1, 2016). Furthermore, the rationales for contracting out say nothing about bad government, the rationales for contracting deal with efficiency and effectiveness such as: cost savings, need for skilled staff, quality improvement, flexibility and political support (Smith, Practical Rationales for Contracting Out, 2016). Additionally, according to DeHoog, the advocates of contracting out argue that the privatization of services will enable to government to save money through the removal of waste through true cost, economies of scale, reduction of high personal cost and greater flexibility. These rationales are similar to rationales given in lecture eight and deal not with bad governance, but with ineffective or inefficient results (DeHoog,…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Privatization In Canada

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In other words, when private sectors cannot keep up with demand, or are not able to make deliveries of goods and services, this is when the government will step in to assistance and provide aid. On the contrary, the government will only provide services as long as it benefits citizens. This means that services will only be provided by the government when these services are in of revaluation, high in demand or government assistance is needed, there for services sometimes alter between statuses. Throughout this essay the terms public service and private service sectors will be examined, clearly defined and discussed. Privatization in Canada will also be inspected, and the question of when it is appropriate to privatize public services will be answered with support. The type of services which citizens should have access to will also be clarified and public interest will also be explored. Therefore, this essay will argue that Canadian businesses and corporations should be public sector services when the main function of the businesses are to serve citizens with essential services and goods, whereas self-sufficient businesses and corporations which have mainly profit in mind should be privatized for the good of Canadian…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Factors such as it’ cheaper, avoiding “red-tape”, being creative and saving time, creation of new jobs, and more all seem to make it worthwhile for private companies to take over. But with all these pros comes the cons as well.…

    • 1505 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some could argue that it is a marketing mechanism; however, this can lead to the reduction in power and the diminishing of sectors in the government. It is not even just government sectors that are being bought out, it is even prisons, sewer systems, and parts of the military. In my opinion, this can lead to even more corruption in the government and federal systems. This is because the government no longer has complete control over these parts and the new owners have most of the say. In private prisons, there is a quota of people that need to be in the prison which leads to several infractions given to the prisoners leading them to stay longer than their original sentence. This is just prisons, imagine what is going on in the actual government…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The objective of this paper is to provide a concrete overview, and demonstrate how privatization of public services agencies is taking place in the area of health and human services. I will also look at the rationales behind privatization and the evidences of how effective or problematic this could be for many government agencies. We must agree that privatization is not a new concept and this has been around for a many decades. What is privatization? What are the pros and cons? These questions have been discussed among many import people in society without reaching most of the times an agreeable conclusion. As we all know privatization can be define or refer to the act of transferring ownership of specified property or business operations…

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Global data showing about 70% of GNP being produced in the private sector reflects the high levels of privatization of industrial enterprises, with the great bulk of enterprises having been privatized by mid-1994. However privatization does not necessarily mean the complete…

    • 2294 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    privatization

    • 1646 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Efficiency and productivity is one of the benefits of privatization. The services and administration of privatized entities improved significantly as evidenced by increases in the efficiency and productivity indicators of selected entities. This was due to the improvement of facilities by these companies which were also able to obtain new and modern…

    • 1646 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    If it were privatized a few would stand to make a lot of money (like the privitization of liquor stores in some provinces).…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To increase the long-term contribution to the economy, they will open up new investment opportunities, and facilitate investment, encourage innovation and competition, and remove all obstacles that prevent the private sector a greater role in development.…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ultimately, privatization gives new life to an ailing PSU. But initially, privatisation changes three things -- incentives, priorities and access.…

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Privitization in Kenya

    • 11553 Words
    • 47 Pages

    Shapiro, C &Willig, R. (1990). “Economic Rationales for the Scope of Privatization”, in: Suleiman and Waterbury (eds.), The Political Economy of Public Sector Reform and Privatization, West view Press.…

    • 11553 Words
    • 47 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Now lets talk a little about the differences between the public and the private sectors , firstly , private sector businesses are owned by private people but as for the public sector businesses they are owned by the country as a whole , there are no individual owners in the public sector, secoundly , private sector businesses are controlled by the people who own them or by directors and managers appointed to do so , but public sector businesses are controlled by the government or local authority, the third difference is the method of raising capital , in private sector businesses the capital is invested by private people but as for the public sector the capital is always taken from the public and invested in the company as shares , the fourth and major difference is the way in which the profit of the business is used or losses are…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    • As the market can provide for scientific research, it is better for private companies to undertake this funding instead of the state. The state can then allocate more resources to goods and services which the market does not provide.…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays