One of the pressing issues in medicine is that people do not go their primary care physicians proactively. As a result we have seen a continuous rise in health problems and a continuous decline in good health. Statistics confirm that the lack of resources available to people are a major contributing factor in this epidemic. This issue can not be ignored. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) had to take notice. They completed several studies to help determine where some of the problems are and how they can be rectified or modified at least. The conclusion was that preventive practices were overall the determining factor in circumventing a lot of health concerns becoming problematic and in some cases fatal. Another area of concern for this modern way of concern from the physician's perspective was making sure that they are able to serve and meet their patients' needs. According to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ, 1996) at one point there was a "growing scope of and complexity of medical information, physicians are finding it increasingly difficult to stay abreast of current medical knowledge. This growth in physician-targeted medical information is evident in the proliferation of subspecialty journals, the growing presence of clinical-economic studies, and the escalating marketing efforts of a range of actors. Policymakers and managed care providers have entered the fray, vying to affect physician practice with an expanding array of clinical guidelines, profiling, and utilization review.The rapidly increasing availability of information has coincided with fundamental change in the structure and delivery of care
Access to medical information and dissemination of findings is central to the management of costs and clinical outcomes." Even physicians had to take notice in the way they handled their practices. Practicing preventive medicine is at minimum dually beneficial: it heightens the patient's awareness of ways to obtain and maintain good health but it also serves as a benefit to the government and its entities as a way to monitor any emergent trends that have the possibility to incur unanticipated expenditures. One last point is the need to focus on certain communities. It is has shown through scientific study that certain communities are more prone to certain diseases compared to others such as diabetes. The National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NDEP, 2005) states that "African Americans are twice as likely as whites of similar age to develop type 2 diabetes
" They also state that "3.2 million African-Americans
have diabetes, one third of who are undiagnosed." It is hard to imagine the cost of treatment associated with that many people being inflicting with this disease. If African Americans were more likely to seek out preventive professional help from the medical community this diagnosis would decrease the cost associated with it as well. "Diabetes is one of the leading causes of death and disability in the United States. Total health care and related costs for the treatment of diabetes run about $132 billion annually." (NDEP, 2004)) Cost of Prevention
Cost analysis has to be a considerable factor when promoting prevention. If people only went to the doctor when they were sick and/or to find out that this "sickness" had progressed to an irreversible disease healthcare cost would skyrocket. Insurance companies and associated organizations rather pay for ways to help reduce the number of times a person becomes ill or prevent ways to have to deal with hospital costs if an illness progresses to that point. "Cost analysis studies identify the personnel and other resources used to deliver prevention services and calculate the monetary value of those resources to various stakeholders, such as society as a whole, community providers, or government funding agencies. These studies provide information about the start-up and...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document