President Jackson

Only available on StudyMode
  • Download(s) : 172
  • Published : February 4, 2013
Open Document
Text Preview
Analyze the extent of Jackson’s economic policies and changes in electoral politics influencing the development of democracy between 1820-1840.

Compromise between the President and Congress,and debates are things that define American democracy in the 21st century. America's political landscape would seem foreign without the fighting of the party not in power, or the role that every person plays in electing public candidates. As odd as it may seem, our democracy did not always pursue the vote of the common man, or even have two battling political parties. These aspects of American democracy can be traced back to changes that occurred between 1820 and 1840. Jacksonian Economic Policy and Changes in Electoral Politics advanced the development of democracy between 1820 and 1840.

Jacksonian Economic Policy advanced the power of the presidency in ways that the writers of the constitution could have never imagined. George Washington, the first president, set examples for how the constitution should be interpreted for the job of the presidency. He only served for two terms, He didn’t believe in permanent political parties, and he only vetoed a bill when it questioned constitutionality. Jackson’s Economic Policy broke one of those warnings and enhanced the development of American democracy for generations to come. Jackson believed, and many of his supporters, that the bank was far too powerful. The bank served mainly to private investors, and not the common people. In 1832 when Henry Clay, one of Jackson's political enemies, proposed an early recharter of the Bank of the United Sates he hoped to get rid of Jackson's wealthy supporters if Jackson vetoed the recharter, and if he passed it then the common man would feel betrayed. Andrew Jackson, immediately vetoed the recharter once it passed through congress. His veto of the recharter bill marked the first time in American history that a president vetoed a bill simply out of dislike, and not out of the possibility...
tracking img