Preview

Prediction of Cross-Axis-Sensitivity of Inertial Micro-Sensor Through Modeling and Simulation

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2171 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Prediction of Cross-Axis-Sensitivity of Inertial Micro-Sensor Through Modeling and Simulation
Prediction of Cross-axis-sensitivity of inertial micro-sensor through modeling and simulation
B. P. Joshi1, A. B. Joshi2, A. S. Chaware2 , S. A. Gangal*2
1

Armament Research & Development Establishment (ARDE), DRDO Ministry of Defence, Dr Homi Bhabha Road, Pashan Pune-411021, India Ph. No.+91-20-2588 4795, Fax No.+91-20-2589 3102 E-mail:bpjoshi@ieee.org 2 Department of Electronic Science, University of Pune, Pune-411 007, India Abstract: In addition to sensitivity and bandwidth, the cross-sensitivity is an important design parameter for acceleration/ inertial sensor design. In this paper prediction of cross-axis sensitivity of cantilever type of piezoresistive accelerometer is discussed. The effect of variation in geometrical parameters such as width and thickness of flexure & proof mass (PM) on crosssensitivity are studied. Optimization of cross-sensitivity by varying geometrical parameters has been attempted. This paper deals with simulations of skewed type (Flexure perpendicular to proof mass) and planar type (Flexure in plane with Proof mass) structure for cross-axis sensitivity analysis. The simulation and modeling has been carried using Coventorware MEMSCAD software. Keywords: Inertial sensor, Cross-sensitivity, MEMSCAD, FEM.

1 Introduction
Micromachined accelerometers are widely used in many applications. Large number of scientists all over the world are working on MEMS based acceleration sensors that are mostly either capacitive or of piezoresistive type. A piezoresistive type of acceleration sensor basically consists of a proof-mass attached to a micro-cantilever (Flexure) all made out of silicon. [1-4]. For piezoresistive accelerometer sensitivity S is defined as relative change in resistance per unit of acceleration. Following mathematical equation defines relation between sensor dimensions and its sensitivity [5]. Equation for sensitivity can be written as:

S

=

K .g .L t 2

(In Pa.)

…… Eq. 1

Where, S is the sensitivity [stress



References: 1. J.A. Plaza, J. Esteve, E. Lora-Tamayo, Simple technology for bulk accelerometer based on bond and etch back silicon on insulator wafers, Sensors and Actuators, A68, 1992, p199-302 2. Aaron Partridge, J. Kurth Reynolds, Benjamin W. Chui, Eugene, M. Chow, A HighPerformance Planar Piezoresistive Accelerometer, JMEMS, vol 9, No.1, March 2000, p 58-66. 3. R.P. Van Kampen, R.F. Woffenbuttel, Modelling the mechanical behaviour of bulkmicro machined silicon accelerometers, Sensors and Actuators, A64, 1998, p137-150 4. L M Roylance and J B Angell, “ A batch fabricated silicon accelerometer.” IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, vol. ED-26.pp. 1911-1917. Dec. 1979. 5. Sabrie Soloman, Sensors Handbook, MGH Publications, 1998 pg no 66.31 6. Kaiyu chen. A survey of piezoresistive semiconductor accelerometer. EE663 microelectronic sensor project report. 7. H. crazzolara, G.Flach, W.von Munch. Piezoresistive accelerometer with overload protection and low cross-sensitivity. Sensor and actuators A.39(1993)201-207 8. Homg chen, Mihang bao. A piezoresistive accelerometer with novel vertical beam structure. Sensor and actuators. A63(1997) 19- 25. 6

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lab 106 Oct17

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Our objectives are to measure the static and kinetic frictional forces using force sensors. Also, to determine the coefficient of static and kinetic frictional forces, amd the relationship between the frictional forces.…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In order to find the precision, take the difference between the minimum and maximum accelerations (0.10 m/s^2) and divide that with 9.82 (the average acceleration). After you take that result and multiply by 100.…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Picked Fence Exparament

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Purpose: To measure the acceleration of a freely falling object (g) to better than 0.5% precision using a Picket Fence and a Photogate.…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Physics Lab

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The acceleration of the 50 g rate weight was .10 greater than the weight of the 100 g weight; however, this is attributed to our sources of error. Therefore, we concluded that mass does not affect the acceleration due to…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The strain rosettes are orientated so that θb = 0, θc = -45, and θa = 45.…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Physics Lab Report

    • 3590 Words
    • 15 Pages

    with the accepted value of 9.8m/s^2. In the second experiment, acceleration of a cart traveling down a slight incline was measured with a two photogate method. Gravity was calculated and yielded a value of 8.7429, a bit lower than the accepted value of 9.8 m/s^2. The third experiment was the measurement of acceleration due to a horizontal force, a pulley system with a weight attached. The acceleration was measured with a single photogate. Gravity was calculated to be 9.209m/s^2 which is slightly lower that the accepted value of 9.8m/s^2. In the final experiment, a sonic range finder was used to calculate the properties of walking motion including distance, time, velocity, and acceleration. The starting acceleration was calculated to be .3778m/s^2 and the negative acceleration was calculated to be -.4844m/s^2.…

    • 3590 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Free Fall Lab

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hypothesis: If the acceleration due to gravity is measured on Earth, Moon, and Mars, then the results will be different due to the fact that each planet and satellite has a different gravitational attraction since each has a different mass. The researcher believes that each of the values will differ with the largest acceleration being Earth and the smallest acceleration being the Moon. The researcher also predicts that their results will be comparable to given standards however error and uncontrollable factors including air resistance will alter results slightly.…

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Additionally, to determine an experimental value for acceleration one must find velocity, time, and then calculate your equation. Then, calculate gravity by using the acceleration value and divide it by 0.0043.…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    motion

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The SI unit for the acceleration is 1 m/s2. This equation can be rearranged as,…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Physics Cantilever Lab

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Purpose: The purpose of this Physics Lab is to investigate what factors determine the amount of flexion of the cantilever. Hence, the objective is to establish a relationship between the length of a cantilever, which may give some insight into the physics of cantilevers.…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    F = C/D and failure is assumed to occur when F is less than unity.…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Force Sensor and an Accelerometer will let you measure the force on a cart simultaneously with the cart’s acceleration. The total mass of the cart is easy to vary by adding masses. Using these tools, you can determine how the net force on the cart, its mass, and its acceleration are related. This relationship is Newton’s second law of motion.…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    accelerometer - measures g-force, its great to determinate pitch and roll angles, however accelerometers are acceptable to vibrations and shock…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    y x A dA y x Product of Inertia of A wrt x and y axis: Product of Inertia of Element dA:…

    • 3351 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    PZT-5A layer is poled along the thickness direction result in transverse (d31) operation mode. Such configuration is chosen since it enables the condition of low frequency to be fulfilled. The design of the piezoelectric cantilever is selected by taking in to consideration it low acceleration (<= 1g) and low excitation frequencies (10- 70Hz) [23]. These conditions are correspond to common environmental vibrations. Neodymium magnetic proof mass of density 7500Kg/mm3 and dimension 20 x 10 x 8 mm3 fixed at the tip of the beam approximated as point mass. A magnet of same properties is fixed at distance d from the piezoelectric cantilever beam tip. When d is sufficiently large the effect of magnetic repulsive force between two poles become negligible. As the d decrease the effect of magnetic repulsive force increase as shown in Figure 3. In the absence of any magnetic force the first natural frequency of beam is found to be 48.3614 Hz that is similar to the linear frequency (48.4 Hz) calculated by [24]. The magnetic force leads to cubic nonlinearity in the stiffness of the piezoelectric beam result in monostable or bistable system depending on the distance d. Monostable and bistable region can be found from linear frequency plot of Equation (1) as shown in Figure 5. For the convergence of first…

    • 1843 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays