Preview

Predatory Pricing

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
16100 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Predatory Pricing
Quo vadis? Towards an effective predatory pricing provision
Garth Campbell*
The level of criticism directed at s 46 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) for its inability to capture predatory pricing indicates that smaller businesses are extremely concerned about this practice. Such criticism reached its peak following the High Court’s decision in Boral Besser Masonry Ltd v ACCC (2003) 215 CLR 374, which rejected a claim of predatory pricing. Since then, the Birdsville Amendment and other recent amendments to s 46 have attempted to more effectively capture predatory pricing by defining it more accurately. However, it remains to be seen whether these amendments will be successful. This article assesses the application and effectiveness of the Birdsville Amendment by applying it to the facts of the Boral decision, in effect, re-deciding the case on the current law, and attempts to define the characteristics of a truly effective predatory pricing provision.

INTRODUCTION
Predatory pricing usually occurs when a large market participant unfairly lowers its prices so as to damage its competitors, drive them from a market, or deter them from entering a market, and then raises its prices to take advantage of the reduction in competition it has generated. Since the adoption of the Sherman Antitrust Act 1890 (US), jurisdictions around the world have attempted to penalise predatory pricing. However, determining whether pricing is unfair or predatory, as distinct from legitimate and competitive, is a difficult task. Legitimate competitive pricing can also damage competitors, and is hard to distinguish from predatory pricing. The danger inherent in regulating this area is that regulations to penalise predatory pricing may also inadvertently penalise legitimate competitive pricing. Such regulations would have a serious and broad based anticompetitive effect on the economy as a whole due to the central function that competitive pricing performs in any free market economic



References: 80 81 Australian Government, Response to the Senate Inquiry Into the Effectiveness of the Trade Practices Act 1974 in Protecting Small Business (2004) p 7. 104 (2009) 17 TPLJ 82 (2009) 17 TPLJ 82 105

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    antitrust practices

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Antitrust behavior brings about both pecuniary and non-pecuniary costs. Since it damages healthy competition in the market, monopolies can result and this has adverse effects to the prices of commodities. The products end up becoming costly and expensive for the customers and, therefore, affecting the society negatively (Bailey, 2010). On the other hand, antitrust behavior leads to the output of products falling below the market competitive level and this is mainly…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As you market yourself to employers, the salary you demand is essentially your personal price. Keeping that in mind, what pricing strategy should you follow (penetration, skimming, or competitive)? Why? Issues to consider:…

    • 257 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Referring to case low to support your answer, explain the implied terms of the Sale of Goods Act 1979.…

    • 1306 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Median Income Case Study

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The United States and many other countries have antitrust laws on the books to protect their consumers in their different markets. Having the abilities to both raise and lower prices are the reasons that oligopolies are so harmful.…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This act entitles all customers to fair treatment and honesty from any business they deal with. Under this act, businesses cannot use aggressive sales tactics such as using fear or a sense of urgency to sell their products. Businesses cannot put on dishonest promotions such as a ‘closing down sale’ when they are not even closing down.…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Price Gouging

    • 2374 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Michael Spinelli (2009), The Differences Between Kant and Aristotle [online] Accessed on 27/11/2012 Available at http://voices.yahoo.com/the-differences-between-kant-aristotle-3632521.html?cat=38…

    • 2374 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Ethics of Price Gouging

    • 17423 Words
    • 70 Pages

    ), Ethical Philosophy, book 2, pp. 31-161. Indianapolis: Hackett. Kirzner, 1.1979. The Perils of Regulation: A market process approach. Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami School of Law, Law and Economics Center. 1996. The meaning of market process: Essays in the development of modern Austrian economics. New York: Routledge. Leff, A. A. 1967. Unconscionabihty and the code: The emperor 's new clause. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 115. Mas-Colell, A., Whinston, M., & Green, J. 1995. Microeconomic theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Mayer, R. 2007. What 's wrong with exploitation? Journal of Applied Philosophy, 24: 137-50. Meyers, C. 2004. Wrongful beneficence: Exploitation and third world sweatshops. Journal of Social Philosophy, 35: 319-33. Miller, R. 2004. Beneficence, duty and distance. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 32: 357-83. Munger, M. 2007. They clapped: Can price gouging laws prohibit scarcity? Retrieved June 12, 2007, from http://www.econlib.org/LIBRARY/Columns/y2007/ Mungergouging.html. Murphy, L. 2003. Moral demands in nonideal theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.…

    • 17423 Words
    • 70 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the aftermath of Hurricane Charlie in 2004, a debate was waged regarding alleged price gouging that took place and whether it was justifiable or not. On one side of the argument you have people who were in favor of the free-market concept and that vendors/retailers should be able to charge whatever the market will bear for their goods and services. On the other side were the people who supported price gouging laws and the government’s role of controlling such instances in the wake of tragedies such as Hurricane Charlie for the betterment or welfare of society as a whole. It is my opinion that the behavior of the vendors/retailers who were gouging these people was morally unacceptable and I will discuss it further in this paper.…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Robinson-Patman Case

    • 1659 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Supreme Court has ruled that price discrimination claims under the Robinson-Patman Act should be evaluated consistent with broader antitrust policies. In practice, Robinson-Patman claims…

    • 1659 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Greenbik Case

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Predatory pricing which breaches CCA if advantage is taken by a competitor with substantial market power for the anti-competitive purpose to provide services below cost price to drive other competitors from market. The facts do suggest signs of predatory pricing as regardless of how much discounting Cycloplatform gives it is still unable to obtain tenders with city councils. There is the possibility that the three major competitors provide lower quality services and…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Econ: Antitrust

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A slight inkling of antitrust by the consumers can easily destroy a company’s reputation; bring down years of hard work and dedication. This paper highlights the case of Apple Inc. There was a recent case US vs. Apple, that has been on news media. “The Justice Department today released some of the comments it received regarding the ongoing Apple e-book price-fixing case, and many of those opposed to the deal argued that the alleged price fixing helped stop Amazon 's stronghold on the e-book market (Albanesius, 2012)”…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Antitrust behaviors tend to create a barrier to market entry and hence creating a natural monopoly or oligopoly. The firms in the oligopoly are then able to undertake price fixing whenever they want and increase their economic profits (Macgregor, 2012). Monopoly pricing is quite significant in antitrust activities, where the price curve is slopped upwards while trying to maintain or increase the demand curve. The firms were investigated for antitrust behaviors under the Sherman Act which is aimed at preserving unfettered and free competition in any trade activity. The antitrust laws under the Sherman Act proscribes any unlawful business and mergers practices in any industry where the act leave it upon the court to make the decision on which mergers or businesses are legal or illegal all based on the current facts (Macgregor,…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Price Discrimination

    • 1572 Words
    • 7 Pages

    M. E. Levine. Price discrimination without market power. Yale Journal on Regulation, 19:1{36, Winter 2002. Preliminary version available at http://www.law.harvard.edu/programs/olin center/papers/276 levine.htmi accessed at [20 February 2008]…

    • 1572 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Tamblyn J et al CH 11, Pg. 157, ‘Progress Towards a More Responsive Trade Practices Strategy’, Date published: 1993 (Australian Institute of Criminology), Viewed 29th February 2013, http://www.anu.edu.au/fellows/jbraithwaite/_documents/Manuscripts/businessreg.pdf)…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Competition policy promotes market competition by regulating anti-competitive behaviour undertaken by firms. The fundamental reason for competition policy is to allow the smooth functioning of the free market and the price mechanism, thus maximising economic welfare. As we have seen illustrated by the first theorem of welfare economics, competitive equilibrium in markets leads to Pareto efficient outcomes, at which the sum of producer surplus and consumer surplus is maximised- i.e. no firm or individual can be made better off without making somebody else worse off. This is conducive to maximising economic welfare. However, there appear to be other objectives that are taken into account by competition regulatory bodies, such as the protection of consumers, the defence of small firms, fighting inflation, and fairness. We will examine each of these objectives, taking into account whether they are consistent with the fundamental objective of economic welfare, and consequently decide if they are proper objectives of competition policy.…

    • 1799 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays