Preview

Predator Drones: the Unsettling Impact

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1966 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Predator Drones: the Unsettling Impact
27 March 2013
Predator Drones: The Unsettling Impact Thousands of miles away, an aircraft carrying two hundred pounds of explosives flies over Pakistan while the pilot commands the movement of the innovative aircraft in Indian Springs, Nevada. The highly trained pilot in Nevada is only a mere button away from creating total chaos in the quiet cities of Pakistan. The unmanned aircraft attached with explosives halfway around the world is known as a predator drone, or in short, a drone. The use of drones to surveillance and attack terrorism has been part of the United States of America’s military operations since the war on terror started with President George H. Bush in the 1990s. Only since President Barrack Obama came into office, unmanned aircraft strikes have risen at an alarming rate. In The Reaper Presidency: Obama’s 300th drone strike in Pakistan, The Bureau of Investigative Journalism reports, “…CIA [drone] attacks have struck Pakistan’s tribal areas on average once every five days during Obama’s first term – six time more than under George W. Bush” (Leo, Ross, & Woods 1). The aftermath of drone strikes are devastating, as the strike destroys cars, buildings, and other land within the surrounding miles of the original target. The United States administration needs to create a new drone policy that would regulate the usage of predator drones to a bare minimum, in which all drones would only be in use for surveillance purposes in military operations. Predator drones are unjustifiably taking the lives of innocent civilians, creating mental and physical health issues on both sides of the war, and ultimately causing more harm than good for the United States as the number of people in the targeted drone countries increasingly grow with anti-Americanism. In the article U.S. Ambassador To Pakistan Quits Over Drone Attacks There, Cameron Munter, the newly resigned ambassador of Pakistan explains the three types of predator drone attacks, “1)



Cited: Ismi, Asad. “Opposition To U.S. Drone Attacks Rises Globally And In U.S. U.S. Ambassador To Pakistan Quits Over Drone Attacks There. Drone-Making Companies Main Lobbyiests For Rising Drone Use.” CCPA Monitor 19.8 (+2013): 28-30. Academic Search Complete. Web. 26 Mar. 2013. Leo, Sarah, Alice Ross, Chris Woods. “The Reaper Presidency: Obama’s 300th drone strike in Pakistan.” The Bureau of Investigative Journalism. The Bureau of Investigative Journalism. Web. 3 Dec. 2012. 26 Mar. 2013. Reardon, Sara. “I spy. With my faraway eye.” New Scientist 217.2901 (2013): 46-49. Academic Search Complete. Web. 26 Mar. 2013. Standford International Human Rights and Conflict Resolution Clinic and Global Justice Clinic at NYU School of Law. “Living Under Drones: Death, Injury, and Trauma to Civilians from U.S. drone practices in Pakistan.” Stanford Law School Web. 2012. 26 Mar. 2013. Unknown. “Out of Sight, Out of Mind” Drones.pitchinteractive.com. The Bureau of Investigative Journalism. 2012. Web. 26 Mar. 2013.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    Habeas Corpus

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Balko, R. (2012). U.s. drone policy: Standing near terrorists makes you a terrorist. The Huffington Post. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/29/drone-attacks-innocent-civilians_n_1554380.html…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Drone Strikes are popular tools of all countries, especially the United States, seeking to neutralize suspected terrorists. Even though the American public is divided on the issue and the Pakistani public, where U.S. drones have been used the most, is sternly against the use of drones, they remain the weapon of choice for our military. This started with the Bush Administration in the early 2000s, the U.S. government has attacked hundreds of targets in northwestern Pakistan alone. Regardless of the moral or ethical questions, drone strikes…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drones In Warfare Essay

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Should drones be used in warfare? It’s necessary to learn about drones—what they are, and how they are used—before determining the answer. The Air Force calls them Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, or simply UVAs. There are dozens of them flying over countries like Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Iraq, providing intelligence and surveillance. Since September 11, 2001, the US has been fighting the “War on Terror”, in which drones are used to kill suspected terrorists. Drones have changed the pattern of warfare and military outcomes.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Innocent people have been lost due to terrorist attacks. So why is the U.S. retaliating with drones unfair? Drones or unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) are controlled by pilots. There are no people physically in the drone. Drones also have a precise aim, and many innocent people would be spared. Drones should be allowed during warfare. Since drones have an accurate aim, it would be less likely to injure or kill innocent people.…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Esposito, John L., ed. "Taliban." ELibrary. ProQuest LLC, 1 Dec. 2004. Web. 23 Feb. 2013. .…

    • 3493 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Rise of the Drones

    • 1531 Words
    • 7 Pages

    No less than fifteen to twenty years ago, the idea of drones peeping in on our phone calls, text messages, and e-mails was unheard of, but today, according to the director of the FBI, Robert Mueller, as of June 19, 2013 states the government has been using drones to spy in the U.S. but made clear, “the operations of drones is very seldom.” The transformation of drones into surveillance methods is evolving rapidly, increasing the publics concerns of invasions of privacy and violations of civil liberties. The Federal Aviation Administration certified the first two types of civilian drones in July of this year, which was a significant event for Congress. The FAA is currently seeking six testing sites for drones, resulting in a main step in entering the skies of America with unmanned surveillance drones.…

    • 1531 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order to emphasize Harrington’s point Lev Grossman pours more light on criminal activities possible through drones. In addition to the information provided by the previous source, Grossman points out the positive and negative use of drones. For instance in the article “Drone Home,” Lev Grossman makes these comparisons through real life examples. He states that “Drones will carry pizzas across towns and drugs across borders. They’ll spot criminals on the run and naked celebrities in their homes” (Grossman 33). These comparisons provided by the author prove that drones can be both helpful and harmful. While these devices have the potential to help catch criminals they also have the power to do illegal acts that can cause an increase in crime rate.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rich, Alex K., and Gerson Moreno-Riano. "War on Terror: An Overview." Points of View (2010). Ebscohost.com. Points of View, 5 Feb. 2010. Web. 21 May 2012.…

    • 1384 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Morality in Drone Warfare

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Bradley Strawser comes back to clarify a few things about the morality of drone warfare. In a previous article in The Guardian, Strawser’s words were manipulated, wrongly interpreted, and morphed into portraying his ideologies as pro-drone warfare under any condition and that drone warfare had no immoral side to it. However, Strawser corrects this misinterpretation.…

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Ethics of Drone Warfare

    • 1547 Words
    • 45 Pages

    Eleven years ago, the United States Air Force launched a missile from a drone for the first time at a test range in the Nevada desert (Drone Test) . The use of armed drones has risen dramatically since 2009. Now drone strikes are almost a daily occurrence. In 2011 the use of drones continued to rise with strikes in (Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen, Libya, Somalia. Proponents of armed drones argue that their ability to watch and wait, with their highly accurate sensors and cameras gives increased control over when and where to strike its both increasing the chances of success and minimising the harm to civilians. Lt. Gen. David A. Deptula is the first Deputy Chief of Staff for Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance, Deptula contends that “the precision, the persistence, and the accuracy that remotely piloted aircraft bring to the equation actually enhance our ability to accomplish our objectives while minimizing loss of life”. There are good reasons for using more drones. Cruise missiles and jet fighters work against fixed targets, concentrations of forces or heavy weapons on open ground. They are not as useful, however, in today's “wars among the people” fought against insurgents and terrorists. Drones such as the Predator and the Reaper can loiter, maintaining what one former CIA director described as an “unblinking stare” over a chosen area for up to 18 hours. Edward Barrett is director of strategy and research at the US Naval Academy’s Stockdale Center for Ethical Leadership. He says “If you believe that a society has a duty to reduce unnecessary risk to its combatants, then these systems do that, so that would be actually one moral obligation, and then also the state has an obligation to effectively and efficiently defend its citizens, and these systems are effective and efficient. A soldier in the…

    • 1547 Words
    • 45 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drone Warfare, enacted by George Bush and expanded on by President Obama to provide a haven for Americans against the terrorist group, al-Qaeda. The use of weaponized unmanned surveillance drones allowed for far better independent targeting decisions, rather than retrieving intelligence from sources within the real country where the warfare would take place. These strategic implications created a question among Americans, is the use of drones to target individuals right? This question has arisen due to a high number of civilian casualties, making it seem inhumane to do. However, Kenneth Anderson provides readers a strong argument as to why drone warfare is strategically effective in his article, “The Case for Drones” with his organization pattern,…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    CIA drone strikes have the potential to decimate terrorist organizations in an inexpensive manner and reduces boots on the ground combat for American soldiers. Though, we need expansive and additional congressional oversight of drone strikes and CIA targeting. The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI) is devoted to regulating and reviewing every aspect of the drone program, however, committee members are often met with denial and restriction of information. We need to make sure our drone program is met with regulation and preemptive strikes must be strictly reviewed in a legal manner prior to, in order to prevent the endangerment of innocent civilians, radicalization and mobilization of extremest retaliation, and to preserve the reputation…

    • 117 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since the attacks on the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001 and various other terrorist threats, the United States has used unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV), or drones, to eliminate terrorists or potential terrorists. The US should continue using and developing drones as combat weapons because they have less collateral damage than impractical alternatives, keep our own troops safe, and aide military generals with photography and mapping of foreign countries. Moreover, because UAV's cannot guarantee the safety of the innocent bystanders, drones obtain the reputation of creating more terrorists than they tend to eliminate and not only do drone strikes violate the sovereignty in other countries, they also violate the rights of basic human rights. Consequently, drones may be perceived differently in the eyes of Americans and Pakistanis.…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drone Home Analysis

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Drones are capable of being used by terrorists and other criminals for their bad intentions. For example, in the article “Drone Home” on page 7, Lev Grossman points out the possible security concerns revolving the domestic use of drones.…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The United States and its citizens should not support the government’s current campaign of targeted killing. Evidence suggests that the civilian casualty rate of the drone program is increasing the disapproval rate of the United States abroad and may ultimately be leading to an increase of terrorists in foreign countries.…

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays