“PPSMI SHOULD CONTINUE”
Learning English is crucial for every individual in this globalization era because it has been regarded as an international language and becomes an essential means of communication. Many people eager to learn English just not for the sake of pleasure or knowing the language, but it also serve as the platform to success because it holds the key to get assess to the technological, scientific, commercial world, pharmaceutical and medical. Realizing the importance and benefits of mastering English nowadays, Malaysia is moving forward by implementing policies which are believed are able to improve the reputation of English and at the same time, enhancing students’ proficiency of the language.
One of the steps taken by Malaysia is through the implementation of PPSMI. PPSMI is learning and teaching science and mathematics in English and it is the outcome of a policy decision made by the Government of Malaysia as the result from the Minister’s Council Meeting held on 19 July 2002. In 2003, this dramatic shift is implemented in the national education system and it was carried out in stages beginning with the 2003 schooling session. The pioneers were all Year 1 students for Primary Schools and Form 1 and Lower 6 students for Secondary Schools. The full implementation of PPSMI was in 2007 for Secondary Schools and 2008 for Primary Schools. However, after six years of implementation, in 2010, Ministry has decided to abolish the implementation on PPSMI in 2014 following outcry from several quarters who were unhappy with the policy. Believing the importance and benefits of using mother tongue as the best medium of instruction of teaching, I chose to review an article entitled “PPSMI Should Continue”. It is chosen because some quarters express their opinions and forefront arguments on why PPSMI should continuously being implemented in school and in opposition side, I will forefront solid arguments and prove that abolishing PPSMI is a wise decision. Discussion
This could be considered as an ‘ancient’ issue, yet the debates are still going on because each individual possesses different ideas for the policy. When I read the title of the article, I expect to find solid arguments on why these quarters want PPSMI to be continued, yet to no avail. Their arguments are weak and were more on personal beliefs. The main issue emphasized in the article is the procession done by the citizens who disagree with the implementation of PPSMI. My arguments to show that PPSMI should not continue will be presented in six categories. Language and Education
Language is defined as “a form of communication-whether spoken, written, or signed- that is based on a system of symbols” (Santrok, 2008). The importance of language is proved in Genie case, a feral child who spent nearly all of the first thirteen years of her life locked inside a bedroom strapped to a potty chair. She was beaten by her father with a large stick if she vocalized and he forbade anyone in the house to speak to her. By the age of 13, she was almost entirely mute, commanding a vocabulary of about 20 words and a few short phrases. She was discovered at the age of 13 when her mother left her husband and took Genie with her. Later on, she “became the focus of an investigation to provide evidence supporting the theory that humans have a critical age threshold for language acquisition” (Wikipedia). After the rescue, attempts were made to make her speak and socialize and her demeanor shifted considerably, and she became social with adults she was familiar with. Obviously, it is undeniable that language serves as a crucial tool in one’s life and plays a major role in character building. In a paper entitled “The Use of Vernacular Languages in Education” (1953), it appointed out that “it is axiomatic that the best medium for teaching a child is his mother tongue. Psychologically, it is the system of...