Regina G. Lawrence is a political scientist and author of “The Political Force”, her book…
2. Offense-defense balance: Argues that wars are more likely when the offense is perceived to have relative advantage on the battlefield. Central argument scholars make when discussing how perceived offense dominance can cause crises to escalate to war – useful explanation for why states with essentially defensive foreign policy aims can stumble into war…
The Cold War is the name given to the period between 1945, the end of the Second World War, and 1991, the date of the collapse of the Soviet Union and is used to describe a period of stand-off between the USA and the USSR – a cold war being fought by all means short of international armed conflict – who are often described as the ‘superpowers’. Over the past 60 years historians have disagreed over the origins of the conflict, most notably over the question of who was to blame for the breakdown in American-Soviet relations. At the end of the 1940-1945 conflict the alliance of the ‘Big Three’, the USA, the British Empire and the Soviet Union, had emerged victorious yet by the 1950s the Western Powers were at loggerheads with the USSR and remained so until the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991.…
She argues that violence is a function of uncertainty and that it is due to a threat from outside the state or within it. The arguments presented in this text focus on how changes in the balance of power between states and non state actors generate uncertainty and threats which in turn create an environment that is conducive to violence. Here, she looks back at Posen’s theories and says this is similar to his security dilemma, the major difference is that Posen thinks that the dilemma exists even in times of peace. However, in the balance of power case, I find it interesting that the demand for ethnic violence is not pre-existing, but it emerges internally from…
One main strength of the theory is that is understandable, why if a power felt threatened, they would take action against a threat, and seek control over it. This can most notably be seen in the movement of the…
Therefore, the rational response for states are to ramp up their power to ensure their survival. This will lead to balancing of power. With the balance of power theory war is one of the strategies adopted by great powers to maximize their power and ensure their survival. However, the possibility for great powers to make miscalculations are high when they fear other states are making strides in harnessing power for their own survival which may put the great powers on a countermove on a path to war.…
Downs, G.W. 1994. Part 1. Theoretical Perspectives, in Collective Security Beyond the Cold War. United States of America: The University of Michigan Press: 17-40.…
The security dilemma is the international predicament that can best be categorized as aiming to reduce the uncertainty of an anarchistic world order (Booth and Wheeler 2009:132). The uncertainty of states actions has led some realist theorists to attempt to find the optimum strategy for mitigating external threats and thus secure its own interests.There are two levels to the security dilemma; the dilemma of interpretation which is attempting to discover what other nations are doing behind closed doors, and the dilemma of response; how to respond when other nations act. (strat 135) This has created the ‘other minds problem’, attempting to get inside the minds of others in an effort to understand and predict their intentions and actions.(strat136) The importance of the security dilemma in international politics has been present for centuries and is argued by many to be the nucleus of security studies hitherto now. (strat137) The entire international system is driven by realism, by state fear, fear of attack, fear of losing strategic position, fear of…
International relations helps better explain the relationships between states (for example, why the UK and the USA have such a close coalition) and explains why there is international interdependence, as in why member states of the UN have to accept decisions that don’t necessarily facilitate their own needs. International relations explain the governmental systems of dominance and dependence that can help, and hinder countries in their decision-making (e.g. Capitalism, Imperialism and communism). International relations explains more than just the actions of individual and collective states, it also explains the actions of governmental and non-governmental groups, such as terrorist organizations, guerilla militia groups and Green Peace. The I.R theory exists solely to help us understand the world and guide policy decisions. Different theories of I.R. can help provide different perspectives of world events.…
[the] risks crowd in on us, in a shrinking world of polarized power, so as to give us no choice, ultimately, between meeting them effectively and being overcome by them . . . it is clear that a substantial and rapid military building up of strength in the free world is necessary to support a firm policy necessary to check and roll back the Kremlin’s drive for world domination. (Young,…
While the Cold War was labeled a “war,” it was not a war in the conventional sense, as the United States and Russian militaries never met face to face on a battleground. It was a war over power. Who had more allies? Who had superior weaponry? Who had the mightier military?…
“World order” is the term given to the balance of power among the nation states of the world. Differences between these nations can lead to a power imbalance, which affects world order. It can best be achieved through agreements between states and other international instruments that set out the ideal international standards of behavior for states on a number of issues. But conflicts arise between countries due to differences in cultural attitudes and the desire for extra territory. In order to settle such disputes the international community has legal bodies such as the United Nations to cooperate with countries to find solutions and be a leader in settling and spreading ethical standards. Their prime aim is to promote world order. But for society not only the autonomy of nations and the lack of enforcement power but also a range of other factors limit the effectiveness of such an organisations.…
The United States of America has been a prime world-leading country since 1945, and the US has maintained its privileged position through military capability, political leadership, and economic influence. It has then established itself as a global primacy. The U.S. primacy brought crucial benefits, which other nation states are unlikely to attack or threaten the U.S. and American interests directly. In addition, the primacy has significantly contributed to a peaceful international environment. It gave the U.S. the ability to cooperate with other states in order to promote human rights and slow the spread of weapons worldwide (Mingst and Arreguin-Toft, 2011). During the Cold War, there were two superpowers…
Levy, J. S. 1981. Alliance Formation and War Behavior: An Analysis of the Great Powers, 1495-1975, in The Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 25, No. 4, Dec., 1981…
References: Don 't confuse authority, power, and politics, By Ted Gautschi, Consultant, Wellesley Hills, MA -- Design News, May 4, 1997…