Read full document

position of women

  • By
  • June 28, 2014
  • 712 Words
  • 1 View
Page 1 of 2
Position of women in 16 and 17 century:
Women were challenged with expressing themselves in a patriarchal system that generally refused to grant merit to women's views. Cultural and political events during these centuries increased attention to women's issues such as education reform. Though modern feminism was non-existent.

The social structure women limited opportunities for involvement; they served largely as managers of their households. Women were expected to focus on practical domestic pursuits and activities that encouraged the betterment of their families, and more particularly, their husbands. Education for women was not supported—harmful to the traditional female virtues of innocence and morality. Women who spoke out against the patriarchal system of gender roles, or any injustice, ran the risk of being exiled from their communities, or worse; vocal unmarried women in particular were the targets of witch-hunts. The seventeenth century women continued to play a significant, though not acknowledged, role in economic and political structures through their primarily domestic activities. They often acted as counselors in the home, "tempering" their husbands' words and actions. Women were discouraged from directly expressing political views counter to their husbands' or to broadly condemn established systems; nevertheless, many women were able to make public their private views through the veil of personal, religious writings. Marriage:

The seventeenth century represents a fascinating period of English history, drawing the attention of whole generations of historians. This turbulent age saw three major events that had a deep impact on England’ s political as well as social life—the English Revolution, the Restoration of the Stuarts in 1660 and the Glorious Revolution in 1688. Amidst the turmoil of the events, people’s everyday lives unfolded. While it was men’s preoccupation to keep the country’s political and economic affairs going, women had an...
Position of women in 16 and 17 century:
Women were challenged with expressing themselves in a patriarchal system that
generally refused to grant merit to women's views.
Cultural and political events during these centuries increased attention to women's
issues such as education reform.
Though modern feminism was non-existent.
The social structure women limited opportunities for involvement; they served largely
as managers of their households.
Women were expected to focus on practical domestic pursuits and activities that
encouraged the betterment of their families, and more particularly, their husbands.
Education for women was not supported—harmful to the traditional female virtues of
innocence and morality.
Women who spoke out against the patriarchal system of gender roles, or any injustice,
ran the risk of being exiled from their communities, or worse; vocal unmarried women
in particular were the targets of witch-hunts.
The seventeenth century women continued to play a significant, though not
acknowledged, role in economic and political structures through their primarily
domestic activities.
They often acted as counselors in the home, "tempering" their husbands' words and
actions.
Women were discouraged from directly expressing political views counter to their
husbands' or to broadly condemn established systems; nevertheless, many women
were able to make public their private views through the veil of personal, religious
writings.
Marriage:
The seventeenth century represents a fascinating period of English history, drawing the
attention of whole generations of historians. This turbulent age saw three major events that
had a deep impact on England’ s political as well as social life—the English Revolution, the
Restoration of the Stuarts in 1660 and the Glorious Revolution in 1688. Amidst the turmoil of
the events, people’s everyday lives unfolded. While it was men’s preoccupation to keep the
country’s political and economic affairs going, women had an indispensable, though far less
public, part to play. This paper aims at providing an outline of the seventeenth-century English
marriage, viewed from the woman’s perspective. It touches upon topics such as concluding
marriages, basic marriage values, duties of a married woman and possibilities of divorce.
Attention is paid to the areas in which the seventeenth-century reality was different
from today’s. In seventeenth-century England, marriage and sexual morals played a far more
important social role than nowadays. A family centred around a married couple represented
the basic social, economic and political unit. In the Stuart period, a husband’s “rule” over his
wife, children and servants was seen as an analogy to the king’s reign over his people—a
manifestation of a hierarchy constituted by God. A woman was regarded as the ‘weaker
vessel’ (a phrase taken from the New Testament)—a creature physically, intellectually, morally
and even spiritually inferior to a man; therefore, the man had a right to dominate her (Fraser
1981: 1).
In a society strongly influenced by Puritan values, sexual integrity and the status of a married
person gave a woman respectability and social prestige. This, together with the fact that it
was very difficult for women to find ways of making an independent living, meant that
securing a husband was a matter of great importance.
Theoretically, it was possible for two people to marry very young. The minimum legal age was
12 years for women and 14 years for men. In addition, it was possible for the couple to get
engaged at the age of 7, with the right to break off the engagement on reaching the minimum
age of consent (Stone 1965: 652). However, early marriages were rather rare—the average
age of the newlyweds was about 25 years. Interestingly, the basic requirement for a legally
valid marriage was not a formal consecration in a church, but the completion of a marriage
contract, commonly called ‘spousals’. Spousals were an act in which the bride and groom said
their vows in the present tense—‘per verba de prasenti’ (Ingram 1987: 126). In a majority of
cases, this procedure was accompanied by a church ceremony (banns). Yet if the marriage
was concluded without witnesses and not consecrated in a church, it had the same legal