Police corruption is a nationwide problem that has been going on for many years. Not only is corruption a problem on our own U.S. soil, but police practices of corruption go as far east as Europe and Asia. Many studies, polls and examinations were taken to find out how exactly what the general publics' opinions of the police are. Officers receive a lot of scrutiny over this issue, but for good reason.
In the 1980's legal tension involving police searches was a direct result of the war on drugs campaign. Officers were encouraged to stop and seize or search suspicious vehicles to put a halt on drug trafficking (Harns, 1998). But placing this aggressive approach into effect had many negative outcomes. One problem was that it put police on a thin line with the constitutional laws. To no surprise, pretty much no data estimating how often police searches fall outside constitutional laws exist. Only cases that catch the courts attention are logged into the record books. A case study held in "Middleberg" on suspect searches reports that 70 of the 86 searches didn't result in arrest; citations weren't presented nor were any charges filed. Just about all of the unconstitutional searches, 31 out of 34, weren't reported to the courts, nor were they intended to be reported.
Race has played a big role is these searches as well. Out of the 114 police stops, an astounding 96 were African-American citizens, and 30% of those 96 stops were more than likely to be unconstitutional, compared to 22% of whites that were stopped. Brutality has also been an issue linked with these unconstitutional traffic stops. It's so common between cops that there's a tendency for repeated abuse of power and it's basically turned into the "norm". This isn't good because with cops thinking like that it gives them somewhat of a necessity to break the law. They basically feel that in order for them to enforce the law they have to break some. Cops practice this unwritten rule...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document