Preview

Platonism and Knowledge

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2741 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Platonism and Knowledge
Page 1

PHAEDO

Symposium and The Death of Socrates is an ancient Greek text by Phaedo. This old text occurred philosophy, stories and Genesis quote from the Bible. Platonic love is a philosophy which was main concern of this text. Platonic love is a type of love that is pure and non-sexual. Symposium, or drinking party. This party is for those whose want to discuss a philosophy of love. In the dialogue, Socrates discusses the nature of the afterlife on his last day before being executed by drinking poison. Beginning of this Symposium, Plato is talking with Echecrates about him and other company, last time to see Socrates before he drink poison to death of trial. Socrates, philosopher as usual he had speeches after he sat up on his bed, flexing his leg and rubbing it with his hand. And as he rubbed it, he said; ‘What a strange thing it seem, gentlemen, this thing men call pleasure. And how surprisingly connected with its apparent opposite, pain.’ The people of Athens were filled with question about final judgment. Socrates was accused at the end of his life of impiety and corruption of youth. Rumors, prejudices, and question flew about the town. Plato experienced this situation when Socrates, his teacher and friend, accept the ruling of death from an Athenian court. “Phaedo” not only helped the general population of Athens and the friends and followers of Socrates understand his death, but also showed Socrates in the best possible light. They are connected by their common theme of a memoriam to Socrates and the discussion of virtues. By studying this text, researcher can see into the ulture of Athens, and relationships between friends. “If the truth of all things always existed in the soul, then the soul is immortal”. This states that since the soul has all knowledge integrated, one recollects this knowledge through situations in an individual’s life and use one’s reasoning.

Basically, through

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In a close reading of Symposium, we as readers get to browse through an eclectic mix of brilliant and unique minds belonging to poets, philosophers, lovers, play writes, comedians and even war heroes. Each character takes their turn in describing their own ideal of love in this casual setting and the speeches with which we are presented are clearly melded by the life, profession and personality of these speakers. Plato’s success in giving each speech its own character and personality is quite remarkable, and has a considerable effect on how we as readers paint our own mental pictures of each member of the party. While it may seem as though these differing speeches have been placed next to one another in an arbitrary manner, one might find in…

    • 1627 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Summary: In the section of immortal souls I learned that Socrates believe that the soul would never die. People saw him with craziness. They told him that how was it possible if it had not…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato’s “Phaedo” is a dialogue between Socrates and his friends, Cebes and Simmias. These two men have asked Socrates to prove to them that the soul survives after death due to its immortality. Socrates gives them several arguments, which ultimately lead to his conclusion that proves the soul’s immortality and furthermore its perishability. Socrates proves that soul lives despite the body’s death by showing that if an entity has a certain characteristic, it will not accept the characteristic that is the opposite to its own. Socrates believes that the soul and the body are two entirely different things; the body is created to disappear after death and the soul is created to exist forever after death.…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Apology is one of the numerous recorded writings about Socrates. It talks about the trail of Socrates who is arrested on the charges corrupting the youth, not believing in the gods of the lord, and for being a Sophist. Socrates is not believed to have written any books; the apology was written by his student Plato who was at his trial. In this paper, I will discuss I will be talking about the charges laid against Socrates and how he defends himself.…

    • 87 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    After all this, Socrates goes on to the story about a man returning from the afterlife and describing it. At the end of the story, he says that because he and his companions have established that the soul is immortal, and because this story speaks about the immortality of the soul, it is even more important for people to be just and seek good and true knowledge in their life. This, in turn, will bring them much happiness in both this life and the…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Plato’s Apology: A Defense of Socrates was assumed to serve as Socrates’ trial for his being a fink and shady practices with the youth. Socrates safeguarded himself in a way that he was solely operating assistance to the god that claimed that he was more knowledgeable than everyone else. This defiance didn’t function, and he didn’t win the trial. Socrates continued defending during the ruling allocation of the trial, which lead to him being condemned to death, and aforesaid he was compelled to display his state or condition of being subject to death. Socrates looked at death as not being a dreadful. The information in this paper will clarify how Socrates developed that theory and display why this development is not true.…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    For these two articles that we read in Crito and Apology by Plato, we could know Socrates is an enduring person with imagination, because he presents us with a mass of contradictions: Most eloquent men, yet he never wrote a word; ugliest yet most profoundly attractive; ignorant yet wise; wrongfully convicted, yet unwilling to avoid his unjust execution. Behind these conundrums is a contradiction less often explored: Socrates is at once the most Athenian, most local, citizenly, and patriotic of philosophers; and yet the most self-regarding of Athenians. Exploring that contradiction, between ¡§Socrates the loyal Athenian citizen¡¨ and ¡§Socrates the philosophical critic of Athenian society,¡¨ will help to position Plato¡¦s Socrates in an Athenian legal and historical context; it allows us to reunite Socrates the literary character and Athens the democratic city that tried and executed him. Moreover, those help us to understand Plato¡¦s presentation of the strange legal and ethical drama.…

    • 1653 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato’s thought is mostly recorded in the form of dialogues that feature Socrates as the protagonist. The symposium was written between the middle and the late period, and the figure of Socrates serves more as a mouth piece for Plato’s own views. For instance in the symposium there is a brief mention of the theory of forms, which is entirely Plato’s invention. The complex framing devices set up by Plato at the beginning of the dialogue are meant in part to suggest the fictionality of the account.…

    • 2304 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates in essence, believes in god and is too wise for his own good. Throughout whole trial he spoke nothing but the truth however, because of the greed and jealousy of men they convicted him other wise simply because of their own intentions. Furthermore, searching for the truth couldn't be possible because of the reality of the situation: Socrates was considered the wisest man, people in an act of evil wanted to confront and destroy him and in essence, this couldn't be possible because in fact Socrates was the wisest man and was unknowing of it. This in reality represents the irony in the situation because Socrates doesn't consider himself to be the wisest man in Greece, but he is. In reality Socrates only escape from death was to lie and he didn't feel obliged to do so. In fact the truth was there the whole time and it was up to the people to pry through the illusion of this situation and understand what Socrates was saying. This represents the high cost of searching out the truth in this case, which was the causing of Socrates'…

    • 1148 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Symposium by Plato revolves around the subject matter of love. Plato writes about seven different views on love. All of the different views come from the speakers that attended the symposium in honor of Agathon. Eryximachus suggests that each guest should make a speech in admiration of the g-d of Love. The most irrational view on love is provided by Aristophanes' speech.…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In this paper, I will evaluate Socrates’ argument from Phaedo for why philosophers should desire death, perhaps only secondly to wisdom. I will argue that Socrates unfairly characterizes the truthfulness of the senses, and therefore projects a pessimistic view of the philosopher’s virtue during life. This pessimism towards life in conjunction with arguments for an afterlife that liberates reason, seems to suggest that Socrates believes philosophers should desire death: a happy prospect for condemned man, but perhaps a biased one.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Plato’s Symposium is a book of speeches given in honor of Eros, the god of love. Aristophanes, a comic poet, gives the first speech, and the second is given by Socrates. The first speech tells a humorous history of mankind and how it became “whole,” addressing gender issues and sexuality. On a more serious note, the second speech addresses the origin of Eros and his use to humans.…

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates' Apology

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Even though this reading is old it still carries great value and importance because it shows that knowledge as Socrates argues is not ours but it belongs to God. Hence, Socrates’ work will continue even after his death “For the word which I will speak is not mine.” It reminds me of Jesus Christ, which story is similar to Socrates’. They both followed a divined forced rather than their own interests and hence both didn’t have a sign of this divine force until the very end. However, their end, death, might seem a negative end to others but the opposite was for both Socrates’ and Jesus’ point of view. Furthermore, their deaths didn’t stop the work they were doing and were accused of but it rather intensified it, making other to seek same path or belief.…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato, who was a pupil of Socrates and a famous philosopher, represents the four dialogues during the time from the beginnings of Socrates' trial in Athens to the day of his execution. Also he examines themes regarding of the essence of existence, the nature of death, and the value of wisdom. The first dialogue is a "Euthyphro," which is the name of the first citizen who involves Socrates in dialogue. The two men encounter one another outside the Athenian version of the law courts, where Socrates is about to go on trial for corrupting the youth of the city and Euthyphro is about to bring charges of murder against his father. The two men discussion the natures of both piety and justice. Their conversation ending when Socrates proves to Euthyphro that his (Euthyphro's) actions are not what he believes them to be, and Euthyphro leaves in confusion.…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Phaedo, written by Plato is the interpreted dialogues between Socrates, a major philosopher, as well as some others including Cebes, Simmias, and Echerates. The overall idea of the book is Socrates trying to convince his colleagues of his theories, which explains the fundamental argument that the soul is immortal. Since Socrates is introducing such unheard of ideas, and seeming to be challenging beliefs, he is sentenced to death. While awaiting his fate, Socrates asks only one thing of his colleagues, which is to share his theories. Some of his theories are easily accepted; while others require deeper explanation in order fully convince Socrates’ colleagues.…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays