Pin Care Critique Paper

Only available on StudyMode
  • Download(s) : 142
  • Published : September 14, 2011
Open Document
Text Preview
Research Article Critique Paper
Vincent J Ramirez
University of Phoenix
Evidence-Based Nursing Research and Practice
Lois Ramer DNSc, FNP
February 15, 2009

Research Article Critique Paper
The purpose of this paper is to critique a research article; “an intellectual research critique is a careful, complete examination of a study to judge its strengths, weaknesses, logical links, meaning, and significance,” (Burns & Grove, 2007, p. 445). The selected article may be a qualitative or quantitative study from a peer- reviewed nursing journal. This article was selected by this writer earlier in the course. The critique process for this article will cover steps learned during this course. A Quantitative Research

The research article “Multicenter Pin Care Study,” is a quantitative research study, “quantitative research is a formal, objective, systematic process in which numerical data are used to obtain information about the world,”(Burns & Grove, 2007, p. 17). In this study it was determined that using half-strength peroxide cleansing and Xeroform wraps were the best methods of treatment reducing the risk of infections associated with external fixation devices . Comprehension phase

The major sections of the article were clearly identified throughout the report. The literature review, framework, methods, results, and discussion were in bold heading making that section easy to find. The terms and word usage are understandable and therefore, kept my interest throughout my reading. Abstract

The abstract was clear and concise; it gave an overview of the study. In the abstract the background, methods, results, and conclusion were short and informative. It enabled me to gain knowledge before reviewing the research study. Problem and purpose

The problem identified in the study is the “lack of evidence for one protocol as the most efficacious for preventing pin-site reaction/infection,” (Patterson, 2005, ¶ 10). The information read stated that no set guidelines have been established and that many doctors and nurses have their own ideal way of managing external fixation devices .The purpose of the study was to determine the incidence of pin-site infection according to cleansing protocol. This information was stated in the abstract and re-established in the review of literature. Literature review

The study presented a moderate amount of relevant studies the author addresses in the literature. Of the previous studies mentioned the references and cites are peers who have conducted similar researches within a five to 10 year range of this article. Models or theories are not included in the literature review and throughout the article. The summary indicates that the need for further evaluation is still an ongoing process. With the current data collected the author is striving to create a form that can be used and therefore, initiate a long-term research on effective pin-care studies. Framework of study

In this article the framework needed to be extracted from the literature review it was not explicitly expressed. Theories or models are not so defined in the study, but the concept of mechanisms of infection control in patients with external fixations was conceptualized because the study directed the reader what was being researched to prevent infections in patients with external pins. Ojectives, questions, hypothesis

The objectives were clearly not biased, real, and reachable. The question, what are the best methods currently used to decrease pin-care infections is congruent with the hypothesis, half strength peroxide and Xeroform dressing are more effective than soap and water cleansing. The research studied all methods and compared the results of all seven treatments being tested and showed no bias for one treatment over another. Variables

The independent variables in the study were identified as the pin-care protocols the varied cleansing agent and the type of...
tracking img