‘Comment closely on the language and form od Pied Beauty, paying particular attention to the ways in which Hopkins expresses his response to the natural world.’
Gerard Manley Hopkins has a large and vast appreciation of nature. He values all creatures and believes every one of them is beautiful. He was a very grateful religious man; he always praised God for everything. His theory was that everything in the world should be praised no matter what they looked like; everything had a beauty within them. He wants us to glorify God and all his creations. He begins the first paragraph with, ‘Glory be to God for dappled things’. Most people usually only appreciate the good in life, things with beauty. Most people wouldn’t even consider giving appreciation to anything which isn’t. However Hopkins wants to glorify God for ‘dappled things’, he wants us to not only praise what is pretty but everything. He is trying to give off the message to thank God for all he has given us whether it is a rat or a peacock; he wants us to praise God for it. Hopkins has a large use of oxymorons, this has a greater effect on his overall message in the poem. He uses such opposites; provides us with such a strong contrast of language. Words like, ‘swift, slow; sweet, sour; adazzle, dim’. These oxymorons go back and prove his point, to appreciate all of our world’s beauties. Not just the one which is prettier or the one we like more but everything. Hopkins was a very creative person as well; he liked creating new words for his poem. One of them was ‘rose-moles’ which in a way was another oxymoron. In the world we live in, we only praise what has beauty not what we find ugly. This is why he combined the two words rose and mole to make rose-moles. He wanted us to come to a realization to also like these creatures, to love them as well. He feels just because moles are ugly does not mean they shouldn’t have the privilege to be praised. He built a connection with these words; he...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document