Preview

“Physician Assisted Suicides and Euthanasia, Right or Wrong?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2839 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
“Physician Assisted Suicides and Euthanasia, Right or Wrong?
Research pg.1

“Physician Assisted Suicides and Euthanasia, right or wrong?

Who should be the one to determine when to terminate a person’s life?”

Have you ever sat down to think about that question which lingers through everyone’s mind at one time or another? What tells us as humans if the things we do are either right or wrong? A lot of the time people answer that question by looking back at the time when they were children. People usually decide whether things are right or wrong based on the way they were taught to think. As children we are like “sponges” as people like to say, ready to suck all the knowledge we can. So, I began to wonder what have my parents always told me was wrong to do but I might disagree with depending on the situation. That took me back to my morals, ethics, and believes, as a child I was always told that no matter the circumstances “You should never hurt or kill someone” not always in those exact words but along those lines. They made it clear that I was in no right to hurt or end a persons life.

Many people tend to ignore the topic because it is very controversial and at times people cannot seem to find a straight answer that may satisfy them and everyone else. There is many times where people say that these things shouldn’t be done just because they may not want to seem cruel and uncaring, and I put myself in that same category.

Research pg.2 There has been several times where I have agreed with others on the topic saying I believe both physician assisted suicides and euthanasia were wrong just not too look bad. When I started to do the research paper I believed both procedures were wrong. At the end of my paper we will find out my feelings after I become better informed. I have always been taught that no one has the right to decide when one should die; the only one that has the power is “GOD”. I have also never been put in the situation aside from my uncle who was very ill and there was nothing



Cited: Books: 1. “New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures” revised 1984, the Hebrew-Aramaic Scriptures. Exodus chapter 20:13 states “you must not murder” (pg. 104), 1 Samuel chapter 2:6 (pg. 364) states “Jehovah is a killer and preserver of life”

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    I believe that the reason physician assisted suicide is such a controversial issue is because people don't make wills that tell hospitals what they want to be done with their body in case certain unfortunate things are to happen to them. This leaves their families arguing amongst each other and the hospitals on what is the right thing to do for the patient. Personally, I don't believe that somebody should be on life support if they can't even feel,think, or eat on their own. All it is, is torchering their body by making it stay in one position at all times. For example, the Terri Schiavo case in Florida, she was on a feeding tube for about 15 years because her family believed that she was still…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Euthanasia or Physician-Assisted Suicide, is most commonly used on animals who are in pain and need to be put asleep. Most people think this is a humane way to put their animals asleep however, when it comes to humans, some do not think so. People can do this when they are competent enough to wish for a quick and painless death.…

    • 61 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is assisting a loved one to die morally acceptable or is it murder? This essay will look at both sides of this argument and leave the reader to decide which side they more agree with. The main article I will be looking at is the one by Susan M. Wolf and the death of her sick father. There are two sides to this situation. One group of people feel that it is morally and lawfully wrong to help in the death of any person, regardless of who they are and believe the culprit to be just as guilty as a murderer. Others will argue that it is only helping to speed up a process that is inevitably coming and helping a person to quit the pain is human nature showing sympathy and courage. In this essay, I will be looking at both sides of this argument and leave it to the reader to decide which argument he believes to be more reasonable.…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Majority of people all around the world want to have a choice before a death and they are in favor of legalization of euthanasia and physical-assisted suicide.…

    • 2846 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Should physicians be granted the power to intentionally end the lives of their patients? Recent proposals to legalize physician-assisted suicide have raised this question and triggered intense legal, medical and social debate. For some individuals, the debate is fueled by their fear that medical technology may someday keep them alive past the time of natural death. However, this concern is unfounded for mentally competent adults who have a legal right to refuse or stop any medical treatment. It is also important to recognize that today's health care climate lends itself more to undertreatment than overtreatment.…

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    But, an opponent to euthanasia and physician assisted suicide worries about a slippery slope, what terminal patient’s rights could be abused. Beyond the opposition to euthanasia based on apprehension about latent abuse is the threat of the so-called slippery slope. According to Jeffrey’s theory, legalization of euthanasia and physician assisted suicide would be followed by involuntary euthanasia, involving patients whose individual desires could not be evaluated due to pressure from family or financial circumstance or believe that patient is burden on society (p. 123). It would be a sign of non-voluntary euthanasia. Other people can put to death many terminal patients who understand the circumstance even do not want to die. Legalization of…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Physician-assisted death is the act of intentionally providing medical patients with the measures to be able to commit suicide. The requirements behind this medical procedure usually include a patient who is terminally ill and consenting to the procedure. The method to perform this procedure is through a lethal dosage of drugs prescribed by a physician. However, to individuals in the United States, the procedure is constantly borderlining on whether it can be classified as relief from dying or murder.…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In today’s society, giving up appears to be normal. When people are faced with struggles, they often choose the easiest course, running away from them. People should persist and overcome their bad situations. Society does not have enough fight left in it. One never knows how something could turn out. Physician-assisted suicide may not be easy, but it is a horrible choice. It is the act of a doctor prescribing lethal doses of drugs to alleviate one’s pain. A doctor’s job is to help someone live. It is not to help someone die. A doctor takes a hippocratic oath when they receive their license. By assisting someone in ending their life would violate that oath. Physician-assisted suicide should not be legalized.…

    • 971 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is much controversy over whether or not physician-assisted suicide should be legalized. Physician-assisted suicide should be supported because terminally ill patients should have the right to decide whether or not they wish to die. Physician-assisted suicide occurs when the individual assisting in the suicide of a patient is a doctor rather than a friend or family member. However, studies indicate that many physicians are unwilling to provide their assistance in suicide because it conflicts with their ethical beliefs or because it is illegal. Supporters of legalization believe that terminally ill individuals have the right to end their own lives in some instances and that patients, in spite of current law; continue to practice regularly, in secrecy. Opponents of physician-assisted suicide argue that widespread legalization would cause abuse rather than reduce or control it. The opposition side maintains that legalized assisted suicide would lead to deaths of patients who do not really wish to die.…

    • 858 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They say assisted suicide is euthanasia, or something that will lead to it. Something that will create a culture that promotes reckless and rash behavior when it comes to life and death decisions. This, however, is not the case. Physician assisted suicide is the solution to something that many fear, not death itself, but the byproduct of death - pain. It gives people freedom of choice over their most valuable asset, their own right to life. Carefully regulated assisted suicide is not something to be feared in the slightest, as long as patients are in the right mind when they are making the difficult decision. Assisted suicide is a merciful and dignified treatment under these specific circumstances.…

    • 1438 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After all of the talk on Physician-Assisted Death, here are the basics of what Euthanasia is and why it is extremely illegal compared to assisted death. Unlike assisted death, when a patient consents to Euthanasia a doctor or physician is injecting the terminal patient with the drug. Euthanasia is illegal in the simple fact that is not a suicide and classified more under a homicide (Nordqvist). Individuals are torn by religious, moral, ethical and compassionate arguments surrounding the issue. A doctor performing the death and not the patient has been a very controversial topic for a very long time…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Our nation was founded on the principles of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” -Leonard Boswell. In the constitution it states the concept that everyone have the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness therefore, you get to decide if you want to live or not. For people that are terminally ill, or have less than six months to live,they have options. They can do, doctor assisted suicide, euthanasia, or they can suffer until they pass away. When using doctor assisted suicide or euthanasia, the patient doesn't have to suffer, or continue suffering until they die. Doctor assisted suicide and euthanasia are an efficient way to (1) end people's suffering, (2) euthanasia doesn’t end lives early, it prevents them from seeing…

    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When talking about either Euthanasia or Physician-assisted suicide it is considered taboo and it is not with a so-called normal and sane persons reasoning. The issue is that we really don’t know much about it or what pain that the person who has chosen one of these path to come to the decision to end their life on what can be on their own terms. I personally never been affected this or known anyone who has been affected by the controversial subject. When it comes to how I might personally feel about the issue, I am always pro-choice. People should have the right to make their own choice if they are mentally competent in doing so. Not all choices might be good choices but this is where helping services come into play. Euthanasia is a deliberate…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It has always been said by physicians to do no harm to a patient. Also patients have certain rights of treatment and care. Patients have a right to refuse treatment at anytime during the duration of their stay at any hospital. Also patients have a say in what treatment they should have. As long as you are able to make sound decisions, you have the right to refuse any test or treatment, even if it means you might have a bad health outcome as a result (American Cancer Society (2011), Patient Bill of Rights). This bears to question is this ethical and moral to the doctor and patient? There are five potential ‘last resort’ interventions are available under these circumstances are accelerating opioids for pain; stopping potentially life-prolonging therapies; voluntarily stopping eating and drinking; palliative sedation (potentially to unconsciousness); and physician-assisted death (Quill (2012), Physician Should “Assist in Suicide” When It Is Important). I believe exploring these common practices in ‘last resort’ intervention in care will help us see if it is moral or ethical.…

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    On New Years Day 2015, twenty-nine year old Brittany Maynard, a California resident discovered she had an aggressive brain tumor. Nine days after her diagnosis she underwent two different brain surgeries to stop the growth of the tumor only to find out four months later that it had come back even more aggressively. Brittany did months of research and came to the conclusion that her brain tumor was incurable even after the treatments , which would leave her with the feeling of no dignity; because of the side effects of the radiation. Brittany’s options were very limited due to her brain deteriorating but her body being young and healthy, because her body was so young and healthy she was likely to physically hang on longer even though the cancer…

    • 1959 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays