Euthanasia is a complex and controversial topic in society today. Euthanasia is an action or omission to cause death. One topic that is hotly debated is physician-assisted suicide. Physician-assisted suicide is an act of commission by a willing patient and his or her doctor to end his or her life. I believe that physician-assisted suicide is justified in the terminally ill or those with incurable diseases as long as they’re deemed mentally capable of making that decision.
Debates concerning physician-assisted suicide have often centered on legal, religious and moral interpretations of suicide and the “right to death”. Proponents of the legalization of physician-assisted suicide say that it grants the individual more autonomy, or liberty. One’s body and one’s life is their own, so they should be able to make decisions regarding their body and life. In the case of the terminally ill, it’s the physician’s duty to relieve a patient’s suffering. It brings the dying process to a merciful end. Opponents of physician-assisted suicide believe that it wouldn’t offer more autonomy, but would give doctors more control. One doesn’t need assistance to commit suicide. There’s concern about abuse of physician-assisted suicide and about what it would lead to. If every time someone gets an “incurable” illness and they decide to commit physician-assisted suicide, there’s no pressure to find cures for their disease. All major religions condemn suicide, so there is also a religious resistance to the legalization of physician-assisted suicide.
I believe that physician-assisted suicide should be legal with restrictions. Suicide is legal in the United States and those with terminal diseases should have a right to kill themselves if they want to. While some argue that a physician’s assistance isn’t required to commit suicide, the fact of the matter is that most methods of suicide are uncertain and traumatic. Why should someone who is dying of cancer have...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document