Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Philosophy: Tool to Differentiate Reality & Appearance

Satisfactory Essays
492 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Philosophy: Tool to Differentiate Reality & Appearance
Philosophy: Tool to differentiate reality & appearance
In this “The name of Philosophy,” the author Bertrand Russell talks that there is no such knowledge in this world which a man will not doubt. This is a very difficult question and hence a man always doubts everything, even he doubts what is real and what is not. He always finds difference between what appearance is and what reality is. If we look into how the author have portrayed his point of view in the book we see that he has started on with the point that philosophy can be used to find the answer of this question.
He says that there is no such reason which can make the man not answer his puzzling questions and his confusions regarding anything he doubts about what is reality and appearance. He has to realize what reality is and what just appearance is. The chapter revolves around how man can distinguish between this by looking at things which exist in his everyday life. According to me the author is trying to find the answer to his questions regarding this issue, he says that in our daily life there come many things and events like revolving of the sun which is millions of miles away from the Earth, and it will continue to do so. This is a reality and a man should not doubt its existence.
He is of the view that it’s the human mind that alters his way of thinking, he describes this by viewing the daily life objects and their working around him like the light and his own reflection, the buildings, and the people around him. He says that these are the normal things which are viewed by any other person if he sees them also but a man with a doubt will always question these things even if knows everything.
The writer says that philosophers can sue philosophy which can answer all the doubts a man has regarding the things which are real and which are just appearance. He relates to his daily life work and says that there is no color which pre-eminently appears to be the color of table he sits on and by viewing it in different lights the color appear to be different so it doubts our thinking. This is just an appearance and not reality; it’s a trick that our eyes play with us.
The author says that “sensation” is the word that can be used to describe this changing of events and situations and puts in doubt about everything. All our senses can be used for it. What I liked about the writing is that the author has proved the point very logically, and has put the ides in the human brain. Overall I found the writing very good and convincing about how Philosophy can be used to argue about what is reality and what is just appearance and oblivion of our mind.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    He stated that each individual's task in understanding their personal psychology is to put in order the facts of his or her own experience. Then each of us is to test the accuracy of that constructed knowledge by performing those actions the constructs suggest. If the results of our actions are in line with what the knowledge predicted then we have done a good job of finding the order in our personal experience. If not, then we can modify the construct: our interpretations or our predictions or both. People develop constructs as internal ideas of reality in order to understand the world around them. They are based on our interpretations of our observations and experiences.…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To him the reality was of life lay in external things, whereas for me the only reality was of the spirit - of mind. (Page 114)…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Appendix L Com/220

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Passage: By examining beauty on a merely superficial level, some would argue that we miss out on the larger questions in life.…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “of understanding and knowledge” (paragraphs 2 and 3). He creates a sense of hope which is…

    • 476 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essentially, he begins by characterizing all that he could question. He displays the contention of tangible doubt. In his life, the things he has acknowledged as genuine are things he has learned through his senses since he assures…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Maestro Essay

    • 1306 Words
    • 6 Pages

    9. What does ‘there’s no art/ to find the mind’s construction in the face’ mean? It means that you cannot trust a person, by through the means of reading the mind through a…

    • 1306 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    At the beginning of the article he tried desperately to find a solution for this thoughts and even his own existence, he even tried to pretend that his own thoughts were illusions of his dreams and his own existence was even questioned. “(Book Review …Eli Bendersky… Oct. 28, 2008).…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “As I read, however, I applied much personally to my own feelings and condition. I found myself similar yet at the same time strangely unlike to the beings concerning whom I read and to whose conversation I was a listener. I sympathized with and partly understood them, but I was unformed in mind; I was dependent on none and related to none”…

    • 1292 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It states that the ignorance of man allows for him to tolerate other beliefs. The Buddha compares the quarrelling preachers and scholars to the blind men disputing what an elephant is. The preachers and scholars have only seen, or studied, their own beliefs, and therefore believe they are correct and anyone to say otherwise is wrong. This ignorance causes disputes among one another, as did the ignorance of the blind men disputing what sort of thing the elephant was. The Buddha tries to make a point by reciting a poem, and this point being that you have to look past your own beliefs to get the full picture of what is actually there. The blind men were only given a certain part of the elephant to analyze, so that's what they perceived to be an elephant. However, if they were given the chance to analyze the other parts, which the other men had studied, then they would have the whole picture of what the elephant was, thus a complete understanding. So if the preachers and scholars took time to put aside their own ignorance, and look to the beliefs of the others, then they may in fact get an entire picture, and thus a complete…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalist Papers

    • 955 Words
    • 3 Pages

    His philosophy on human nature is that we are animals, ruled by great ego and emotions. Once impulse and…

    • 955 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Grendel & Existentialism

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “I understood that the world was nothing; a mechanical chaos of casual, brute enmity on which we stupidly impose our hopes and fears. I understood that, finally and absolutely, I alone exist. All the rest, I saw, is merely what pushes me, or what I push against, blindly-as blindly as all that is not myself pushes back.”…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He states that whether he is awake or asleep, “it remains true that two and three make five, and that a square has but four sides.” From his perspective, these truths are so evident that they could never fall under suspicion.…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anthem by Ayn Rand

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages

    in his world it was believed that "What was not thought by all men cannot…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rationalism Exam

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In his first Meditation, he describes that our ordinary experience of the world cannot guarantee a good foundation on which all knowledge is based upon. His second Meditation begins with Descartes wondering if there really is anything that we can know. He notices problem with our senses; optical illusions. He continues doubting the credibility of his senses by noting that we perceive distant objects to be smaller than they really are.…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    the end of his Meditations that it is possible to distinguish between dreams and reality.…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays