Philosophy of Literacy Learning
Philosophy of Learning
It was very tough to pick just one learning theory to base your teaching methods on. However, progressivism is the learning theory that I feel I relate to the most. “Progressivism is defined as the focus on real-world problem-solving activities in a democratic and cooperative learning”(Pearson Learning Solutions, 2010). My philosophy is based on the idea that learning should involve real-life situations. Learning becomes more concrete to a student when they apply it to real-life situations, as where learning things that do not connect to them has more of an abstract sense. Personally, I would have to agree with Dewey when he said, “I believe that education, therefore, is a process of living and not a preparation for future living” (Boisvert 1997). Learning is a process of living. I want my students to learn to be able to think for themselves and be problem solvers that will be able to use these skills in real life situations. My philosophy can be explained throughout the definition of a Progressivist, how I would relate it into my teaching, for the students, practice in the curriculum and in classroom management. Progressivism is one of the philosophies of education. In this situation, a teacher would be considered a facilitator; one who guides the students into their curriculum and education (Pearson Learning Solutions, 2010). The teacher in this philosophy must use all of their skills and introduce subjects to the children in ways that are intriguing to the students. The reason being is because in a progressivism model the curriculum is child-centered; it revolves around the child’s interest (Pearson Learning Solutions, 2010). When it comes to teaching, I see teaching as an art. You need to grab that paintbrush and captivate an idea in a unique way that will intrigue the students’ curious minds and use their...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document