Preview

Philosophical Inquiry

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
4167 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Philosophical Inquiry
PHILISOPHICAL INQUIRY:

What is philosophy?

“The love of wisdom.”

Metaphysics: the theory of reality. What is real?
Epistemology: the theory of knowledge. What does it mean to “know?”
Value-theory: the study of value. What gives something value...over something else?
Logic: The principles of right reasoning. What principles do we use?

All of these do not stand independent from each other...they all mix.

September 25:
Abstractions: CH9
Is Fido an abstraction?
Dog is a category...you wouldn’t say a thing is a Caroline.
Fido is NOT an abstraction...because it is concrete. While dog is a concept.

Aquinas: Empiricist
Aristotle: The Universals are in the particulars. We come up with ideas by going to specific to universal (Inductive)

CH 8 and 9 QUIZ:
1. Who advocated the notion of innate ideas? PLATO
2. Name a rationalist identified in the reading PLATO, CHOMSKE, DESCARTES
3. Name an empiricist identifies in the reading, ARISTOTLE, LOCKE
4. T/F: Locke is an advocate of innate ideas FALSE
5. What does the phrase tabula rasa signify? BLANK SLATE
6. What philosopher is associated with “pehenomenalism?’ HUNE

OBJECTIVES:
1. What are the two primary ay sin which the question: “What is the origin of knowledge” can be answered? Rationalism and Empiricism
2. 2. Give three exemplars of each approach, and describe why they are either an empiricist or a rationalist.
3. How are Descartes and Locke alike, and how are the unalike? Descartes, a rationalist, and Locke, an empiricist, attempt to answer very similar questions, but use totally different methods.
4. Explain the significance of the tabula rasa.
5. Define and explain “pehenomenalism.”

Epistemology: concerned with the kind of knowledge involved in truth claims.

INDUCTION: Probability |Universal to Specific| its true until it isn’t
DECUCTION: Certainty |Specific to Universal|
ABDUCTION: Education Guess |Inference to the best conclusion|

What do we know...with

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    b.ii. Be able to elaborate on the “three approaches.” What kind of sources would we use to answer each one? Who speaks authoritatively for each one? What kind of questions do they bring up?…

    • 2254 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Rationalists are right to claim that knowledge is a priori and depends primarily on reason. Discuss.…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    knowledge came from higher power and he has the last say so no matter what the…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I: Both hold that humans have a function and that virtue is necessary for its fulfillment. II: Both hold that certain sorts of actions are intrinsically wrong and that we can know that they are by intellectual apprehension and reason. III: Both hold that things have natures, that their natures determine what is good for them and what is bad for them, and that wickedness is contrary to human nature.…

    • 210 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    philosophy

    • 1472 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Do all rough work in this book. Cross through any work you do not want…

    • 1472 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Kant vs Aristotle

    • 1314 Words
    • 6 Pages

    During the 17th and 18th century two philosophers, Plato and Aristotle, arose carving for themselves a trench in the philosophical world. We can see the biggest distinction between the two in their theories of how we know things exist. The traditions of Plato and Aristotle have been dubbed rationalism and empiricism respectively. Under these traditions many well known philosophers have formed their own theories of God, existence and the material world. Through these individual theories I will show how each fits into the category of either Rationalist or Imperialist. The Plutonian philosophers to be discussed will include Descartes, Spinoza, and Leibniz. And the Aristotelian philosophers will include Locke, Berkeley and Hume.…

    • 1314 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Philosophy

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Compare Browne and Nagel and give their arguments for why we should, or should not, be selfish. Give your own opinion and justify it.…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rationalism Vs Empiricism

    • 2182 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In this paper I will discuss the similarities and differences between Rene Descartes and John Locke, David Hume and Plato. They believe in rationalism or empiricism respectively. Rationalist believed that an important group of fundamental concepts are known intuitively through reason, opposite to experience. For rationalist, the knowledge is innate and that it can¡¯t come from sources such as the senses. They are well known as Descartes, Plato. Empiricist argued that all ideas tracer ultimately back to experiences, such as sense perceptions and emotion. ¡°No ideas or concepts without impression or sense.¡± (Hume¡¯s dictum) And our minds begin as blank. For empiricists, knowledge can only process the ideas experience gives us. Knowledge is also founded on contingent truths (those that can be false and true); necessary truths are only good for organizing our ideas, as in mathematics, but that is all. There are no innate ideas in empiricism; all of our ideas are built up from our experience. They are well known as Hume, Lock and Berkeley. All of them try to find answers to the same metaphysical and epistemological questions. Some of these questions are ¡°What is knowledge?¡± ¡°Is there certainty knowledge?¡± and ¡°Does God exist?¡±…

    • 2182 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Rationalism vs empiricism

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The history of philosophy has seen many warring camps fighting battles over major issues. One of the major battles historically has been over the foundations of all our knowledge. What is most basic in any human set of beliefs? What is the foundation in any human set of beliefs? What is our origin for human knowledge? Theories applying to these questions divide into two rival schools of thought, rationalism and empiricism. The conflict between rationalism and empiricism takes place within epistemology, the branch of philosophy devoted to studying the nature, sources and limits of knowledge. The war between rationalists and empiricists primarily emphasizes the uncertainty of how we obtain the concepts of knowledge and if they correspond with our existence. Rationalism argues that one must rely on reason as a purely deductive process to attain justified truths about reality. In contrast, empiricists argue that knowledge is derived from the role of experience and sense data to formulate ideas. The differences between rationalism and empiricism will be discussed, along with closely examining the advantages of each. Problems with both theories will be identified while arguing that reason and experience together generate factual knowledge.…

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    philosophy

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages

    a body of ideas that reflects the beliefs and interests of a nation, political system, etc and underliespolitical action…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    PLATO THE REPUBLIC

    • 3296 Words
    • 14 Pages

    The benefit isn’t to the expert but to the clients to which the experts help. For example the clients benefit from the lawyer.…

    • 3296 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A fundamental part of a rationalists belief is that we obtain knowledge in thought by just thinking rather than from experience, for these reasons the idea that we are born with innate ideas are crucial to any rationalist. In this essay I will explore the concept of innate ideas and the rationalist’s arguments to support the idea and also the empiricists ideas to argue against the idea.…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Philosophy

    • 2174 Words
    • 9 Pages

    “If a tree falls in the forest and no one is there to hear it, does it make a sound?” Although this famous quote is not the exact wording used by the philosopher Bishop George Berkeley, he was the inspiration behind this idea along with many others. Throughout his life, Berkeley developed theories that laid the foundation for the study of modern philosophy. His life experiences and travels assisted him in becoming the esteemed philosopher that he is regarded as today.…

    • 2174 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Branches of Philosophy

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Epistemology branch asks us the question of how is anything known. Things that are known are taught to us from our parents and by teachers in school. We are taught different things thru text books and by experience. Thru different…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    These questions therefore encourage us to look at things from a different perspective. . No one person can see things from all perspectives. That is almost impossible and it would contradict the ideas currently taking space in your mind. But, it is imperative to remember the perspectives that have come before you. Kant, for example, combined the rationalist and the empiricist perspectives into his own system. He was able to concoct a solution in which he used to of his perspectives in order to make one final system. But in any civilization, there are those who have their doubts. Marx did not believe in Kant’s system, calling it…

    • 1361 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays