Preview

Philippine Presidential Form of Government

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
319 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Philippine Presidential Form of Government
Presidential system is also called a congressional system. It is a system of government where the executive branch presides supports from the legislative. There are various characteristics of a presidential system of government. One of them is that the president is both the head of state and the government and has a fixed term of office.

The presidential system refers to the chief executive of a government, which has no prime minister.

The presidential form of government concerns the elections process. In a presidential government, the president and members of Congress are chosen in separate elections while in a parliamentary process, one size fits all, so to speak. Indirectly, this signifies a weak position for the chief executive in a presidential system of government. The president is unable to dissolve government and order a new election.

The president is elected directly by the people, which means that he has more credibility than a leader who is elected indirectly.

The system is considered to be more transparent because the presidential system and the legislature monitor each other’s actions and there are lesser chances of abuse of power.

Decision making is speeded up and increases the efficiency of the system.

The presidential system is more stable as the president can not be removed like any other government head and there are more chances that he will complete his term.

The Philippines has a government very much like that of the US- but the President essentially holds much more power. The President is head of state, head of government, commander in chief, and presides over a cabinet.

The Philippines also has a legislative and judicial branch of government.

One thing to note is that the President of the Philippines is directly elected by the population (by popular vote) whereas the President of the United States is elected indirectly through the electoral college.

This Presidential form is often described as

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Systems of gov't can be classified as either parliamentary or presidential. The terms refer to the type of relationship between the executive and the legislature.…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Apush Chapter 6 Summary

    • 1528 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Chapter 12: The Presidency I. Presidents and prime ministers A. Characteristics of parliaments 1. Parliamentary system twice as common 2. Chief executive chosen by legislature 3. Cabinet ministers chosen from among members of parliament 4. Prime minister remains in power as long as his or her party or coalition maintains a majority in the legislature B. Differences 5. Presidents are often outsiders; prime ministers are always insiders, chosen by party members in parliament 6. Presidents choose their cabinet from outside Congress; prime ministers choose members of parliament 7. Presidents have no guaranteed majority in the legislature; prime ministers…

    • 1528 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Parliamentary system in Great Britain and the Presidential system in the United States both have histories marked by an absence of abject failure, yet neither system can be considered truly perfect. Consequently, the analyst cannot conclude that either system is better; rather, he must recognize that there are merits and faults in both systems. The Parliamentary system tends to legislate efficiently, whereas a presidential system tends toward gridlock. However, the presidential system grants both elected representatives and citizens greater influence in government. The Parliamentary system tends to favor Prime Ministers who have much experience, whereas the Presidential system…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Today, the two most prominent forms of government are the Parliamentary form of government, often known as the Westminster system seen in the commonwealth nations; and the Presidential form of government seen in the United States. Throughout the years, many debates have been discussed over the question of which form is better; no definitive answer has ever come forward, for the exception that they are both quite different in theory and in practice. Principally, the difference among them is the separation power seen in the Presidential system, and the coexistence of power seen in the Parliamentary system; represented chiefly by party discipline. However, more than this difference alone separates the two. Both forms of government are characterized by how their power is distributed, how laws are created and chosen, party discipline and also the responsibility of each Head of State. Each system has its own dynamic and ever-changing functionality, creating advantages and disadvantages for each system.1…

    • 1624 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Similar to Canada, the American system is tripartite having the executive (President),the legislature made up of Senate and Congress, and the judiciary. As Lijphart hascommented, a major difference between the two systems is in the U.S., the executive is a one person executive made up of just the President. Ostensibly the U.S. has the equivalent in thathas a cabinet population by the various secretaries (health, education, defence, etc.), butconstitutionally they are not part of the executive. This yields a disadvantage especially inthe situations of having to make critical or tough…

    • 91 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The president runs the country and handles all situations in dealing with government issues, other countries, and other statuses. Unlike the ! Kung San, the United States and other countries with leaders are high dependent on their leaders. The !…

    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ways when comparisons are drawn from two similarly strong western liberal democratic systems. They both enjoy the same fundamental principles of liberal democracy, with those living under this system enjoying the same rights and freedoms with comparable economic conditions. The real difference between these two systems lies in the division of power (). Parliamentarism has been defined as having the parliament as the only democratically legitimate institution is parliament, whereby the government’s authority is completely dependent upon parliamentary confidence. (). While argues that there are three conditions necessary to declare a system parliamentary: All major government decisions must be taken by people chosen in elections conducted along party lines. Policy must be decided within governing party (parties if coalition). The highest officials (ministers) must be selected within their parties and be responsible to the people through their parties. On the other hand, in presidential systems according to , an executive with considerable constitutional powers - generally including full control of the composition of the cabinet and administration - is directly for a fixed term. The president is also the symbolic Head of State.…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is similar to a republic, but it is structured differently, with systems put in place to balance and distribute power. Elected officials vote in two two legislative bodies that represent both large and small states. The Senate gives equal say to all states so the larger states do not completely overpower the smaller ones. The House of Representatives gives more power to the more populous states so that the majority still has some say in decision making. A law needs to be passed in both legislative bodies balancing the power of the states. A separately elected leader, the President, holds executive power but is restricted by the legislative bodies. The government of the United States also allows the President to appoint Justices to the most powerful court in the country, the Supreme Court, which holds some power over the lawmaking legislative bodies and the President. These checks and balances of power are the keys to a successful government.…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Germany the chancellor is an extension of the legislature whereas in the united states the president and legislature may be separate as voters vote for both in different elections. The system in the united states that purposefully gave both congress and the executive a lot of power in order to check each other…

    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Parliament Vs President

    • 658 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Presidential and parliamentary government systems are two main forms of democratic political systems and executive-legislative relations. Both hold advantages, disadvantages and similarities. With fluctuating stability, both systems of government have had their share of prosperity, with the ability to maintain.…

    • 658 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The United States of America is an example of the presidential system. The presidential system has a strong and independent chief executive with extensive powers related to both domestic and internal affairs and foreign policy. The president independence from legislature is based on election by people to whom he or she is directly accountable. The legislative branch is made up of two houses of congress. The House of Representatives and the senate. The duty of the legislative branch is to make laws which are written discussed and voted on in the Congress. The senate approves the nominations made by the president to the cabinet, Supreme Court and other post. The executive branch of the US is responsible for enforcing laws; this facilitates responsibities of the federal government such as collecting taxes, safe guarding the homeland and representing the US political and economic interest worldwide. The power is vested in the president. The president is the head of the executive branch. The president is elected by the entire country every four years and is also the one that approves and carry out the laws made by the executive…

    • 1210 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Russia's government has a presidential - parliamentary system which consists of a dual executive with a president who is the head of state and a prime…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Political systems

    • 7882 Words
    • 32 Pages

    Hard to say who wins, if there is a conflict between the president and the parliament, because they have the same legitimacy. Army decides many times. That’s why this system isn’t good for new democratic states.…

    • 7882 Words
    • 32 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are three different types of regimes around the world. The first is a parliamentary regime which develops all power fused together. The executive branch and the legislative branch are combined and brought together into one. Secondly, having a presidential regime leads to a separation of power. There is no fusion of power whatsoever within this regime. The United States of America is a perfect example of having a presidential regime. The executive leader, known as the president, is voted upon the office. Lastly, having a semi-presidential regime leads to a shared power. The president still exists, but he is not the only one with the power to the state. Alongside is a prime minister and a cabinet, chosen by the president. All together they share responsibility for the…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Iran’s Political System

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages

    * The Supreme Leader has absolute power, while the president is under the Leader’s Rule, and has formal functions of the executive branch…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays