Preview

Petition for Certiorari and Prohibition

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
529 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Petition for Certiorari and Prohibition
SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND COMMUNICATIONS (DOTC), petitioner, vs. ROBERTO MABALOT, respondent
FACTS:
Herein respondent Roberto Mabalot filed a petition for certiorari and prohibition with prayer for preliminary injunction and/or restraining order,[1] against petitioner and LTFRB Chairman Lantin, praying among others that Memorandum Order No. 96-735 be declared “illegal and without effect.” the lower court issued a temporary restraining order enjoining petitioner from implementing Memorandum Order No. 96-735. Secretary Lagdameo issued the assailed Department Order No. 97-1025. Respondent filed a Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Petition assailing the validity of Department Order No. 97-1025.
ISSUE:
Whether or not a transfer of the powers and functions of the LTFRB Regional Office to a DOTC Regional Office or the establishment of the latter as an LTFRB Regional Office is unconstitutional”
RULING:
This Court upholds Memorandum Order No. 96-735 and Department Order No. 97-1025 as legal and valid administrative issuances by the DOTC Secretary. Contrary to the opinion of the lower court, the President - through his duly constituted political agent and alter ego, the DOTC Secretary in the present case - may legally and validly decree the reorganization of the Department, particularly the establishment of DOTC-CAR as the LTFRB Regional Office at the Cordillera Administrative Region, with the concomitant transfer and performance of public functions and responsibilities appurtenant to a regional office of the LTFRB. At this point, it is apropos to reiterate the elementary rule in administrative law and the law on public officers that a public office may be created through any of the following modes, to wit, either (1) by the Constitution (fundamental law), (2) by law (statute duly enacted by Congress), or (3) by authority of law.[5] In the instant case, the creation and establishment of LTFRB-CAR Regional Office was made pursuant to the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Plaintiff-Appellant, No. 05-3708 > , Defendant-Appellee. N On Remand from the United States Supreme Court. No. 02-00708—James G. Carr, Chief District Judge. Argued: June 23, 2006 Decided and Filed: July 22, 2008 Before: BOGGS, Chief Judge; BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge; BELL, Chief District Judge.* _________________ COUNSEL ARGUED: Joseph R. Wilson, ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Toledo, Ohio, for Appellant. Spiros P. Cocoves, LAW OFFICE, Toledo, Ohio, for Appellee ON BRIEF: Joseph R. Wilson, ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Toledo, Ohio, for Appellant. Spiros P. Cocoves,…

    • 4533 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Commissioner”) has set forth in the notice of deficiency dated January 25, 2013. The notice…

    • 2314 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Divorce Case Summary

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages

    1. This Notice of Appeal is brought by NDEM BURABARI ODUU, (“Respondent”), pro-SE, who now submits his Appeal or De-Novo request and would show the following:…

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The administrative agencies are governed by many policies and procedures that ensure their actions are fair and consistent across many areas of their cognizance. The policies under review for the purposes of this paper are the interpretive, substantive, and procedural rules that are included in the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) under § 553, and 554. Additionally, agencies are able to create unregulated decisions, known as informal adjudication, that affect their businesses and the areas under their control. Informal adjudication is often the product of statutory interpretation which is the agencies rulemaking response to a statue. Agencies are given the “deference” as experts to create their own interpretation of the statutes (Cann, 2006, p. 297). The following short discussions regarding several prominent cases all involve a correction or clarification to policies enacted as a result of statutory interpretation. Often the clarification is centered on the meaning of a single word or a short phrase that is ambiguous or does not provide clear guidance as it pertains to the regulation of a federal administrative agency.…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The District Court denied Respondents' Motion for a Preliminary Injunction and upon appeal; the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed and ordered the District Court to enter said Preliminary Injunction. The Petitioner approached the United States Supreme Court who granted them a Writ of Certiorari and after consideration, vacated the Judgment of the Court of Appeals and remanded.…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    An abstract idea is not patentable simply because it is tied to a computer system. That was the primary finding in the recent United States Supreme Court decision in Alice Corporation Pty. Ltd v. CLS Bank International, No. 13-298, (U.S.…

    • 2739 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chapter 8 bureaucracy task specialization the Pendleton Act Regulations the Administrative Procedures Act one-fourth department Discretion the Treasury Department They must solicit public comments. running for elected office make changes in an agency’s annual budget proposals Interagency councils the Department of Defense adjudicating/engaging in quasi-judicial processes implementing public policies ensure opportunities for public participation in the rule-making process by nominating federal appointees the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) the Tennessee Valley Authority…

    • 1724 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Statement of Jurisdiction

    • 6557 Words
    • 27 Pages

    R. App. P. 4. The district court entered the order from which appeal No. 0315420 was taken on February 12, 2003. JSL timely filed a Supplemental…

    • 6557 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Courtroom Observation

    • 2129 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Bibliography: Gumpresht, M. E. (2008, March 12). Memorandum in Opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment. Civil Action No. 82A04-8876-CV-285…

    • 2129 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    from the decision of the Commission to the District Court of Bernalillo County pursuant to s 59-9-6(K),…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    * CA - finding that Gonzales was illegally dismissed, affirmed with modification the NLRC decision.…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Arsenio P. Lumiqued was dismissed from his position as the Regional Director of the Department of Agrarian Reform-Cordillera Autonomous Region (DAR-CAR). The dismissal was the aftermath of 3 affidavit-complaints filed by private respondent and DAR-CAR cashier Jeannette Obar-Zamudio. The affidavit-complaints charged Lumiqued with malversation due to falsifying gas receipts for reimbursements, violation of COA’s rules and regulations on concealing unliquidated cash advance, and oppression and harassment for unjustly terminating Zamudio’s services as cashier. Committee hearings on the complaints were conducted, but Lumiqued was not assisted by counsel. The committee granted Lumiqued’s request for resetting the second hearing to enable him to employ the services of counsel. However, neither Lumiqued nor his counsel appeared, so the committee deemed the case submitted for resolution. Adopting the recommendation of the Investigating Committee, President Fidel V. Ramos dismissed Lumiqued from his position pursuant to Administrative Order No. 52. Lumiqued filed a motion for reconsideration alleging that he was denied the constitutional right to counsel during the hearing. In view of Lumiqued's death, his heirs instituted this petition for certiorari and mandamus, questioning such order.…

    • 523 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    History of Nursing Laws

    • 3263 Words
    • 14 Pages

    * Pursuant to Commonwealth Act 430, transfer of jurisdiction of the board to the Department of Health and Public Welfare…

    • 3263 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Petitions for certiorari, prohibition, mandamus, quo warranto, and habeas corpus against court of appeals and sandiganbayan.…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil Liberties Union

    • 1454 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Executive Order No. 284 issued by President Corazon C. Aquino on July 25, 1987. The pertinent provisions of the assailed Executive Order are:…

    • 1454 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays