Hofstede’s dimensions of culture are the most popular model to explain the various effects across cultures. The data gathered by Hofsted from approximately 70 countries analyzed survey responses from participants. He developed five cultural dimensions that vary across multiple countries; Individualism- Collectivism, Masculinity- Feminity, Power Distance, Long Term Orientation, and Uncertainty Avoidance. Each characteristic carries a certain impact on cultural business practice.…
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations. Second Edition, Thousand Oaks CA: Sage Publications, 2001.…
Australia and China are known to be different in almost every characteristic According to Hofstede’s Cultural dimensions. These two countries are different in all the five aspects, which are, individualism, power distance, uncertainty avoidance, masculinity and long term orientation. Begin with China; Chinese people are very collectivism as they like to do things in group, high in power distance as inequality is considered to be normal and low score in uncertainty avoidance as they like to live with rules and instruction. China is masculinity and highly long term oriented society. On the other hand, Australians got the second-highest score in term of individualism, thus low score in power distance, as they believe in egalitarianism. They ranked high in uncertainty avoidance because they view unexpected situation as a challenge. Lastly, they are masculinity and short-term orientation society (China - Geert Hofstede, n.d.).…
In all cultures, there are different dimensions that can be categorized into a continuum. Kluckhohn and Strodtbeck have functions of cultural patterns such as common human problems, preferred solutions and most importantly, a continuum. A continuum is how things are rated by percentages. For example, happiness. It could be either more or less in certain situations. In Hofstede’s dimensions of culture, there are two topics and only one can be higher in certain cultures than others. The country I chose to do is the culture of Venezuela. Venezuela is very similar to the rest of the Latin American countries but has exceptional characteristics when it comes to the dimensions that Hofstede describes. The dimensions of culture that will be discussed fall into the four common ones: collectivism, power distance, masculinity and low uncertainty avoidance.…
Hofstede’s Dimension of culture determines how a society is in managerial sense. Each dimension represents how close an individual might be to others, or whether or not the country is passive or aggressive. After reading the information and understanding, the study will then discuss Hofstede’s determination of Japan.…
In 1603, after decades of civil warfare, the Tokugawa shogunate (a military-led, dynastic government) ushered in a long period of relative political stability and isolation from foreign influence. For more than two centuries this policy enabled Japan to enjoy a flowering of its indigenous culture. Japan opened its ports after signing the Treaty of Kanagawa with the US in 1854 and began to intensively modernize and industrialize. During the late 19th and early 20th centuries, Japan became a regional power that was able to defeat the forces of both China and Russia. It occupied Korea, Formosa (Taiwan), and southern Sakhalin Island. In 1931-32 Japan occupied Manchuria, and in 1937 it launched a full-scale invasion of China. Japan attacked US forces in 1941 - triggering America's entry into World War II - and soon occupied much of East and Southeast Asia. After its defeat in…
Professor Geert Hofstede initially developed a model that identified four primary dimensions to assist in differentiating cultures: Power Distance index - PDI, Individualism - IDV, Masculinity - MAS, and Uncertainty Avoidance Index - UAI. Geert Hofstede later added a fifth dimension after conducting an additional international study with a survey instrument developed with Chinese employees and managers. That dimension, based on Confucian dynamism, is Long-Term Orientation LTO. For our purposes, we will focus on three cultural dimensions: Power Distance Index 's relationship to behavior and group mechanics; Individualism 's relationship to group mechanics; and Masculinity 's relationship to norms.…
Through using mainly Hofstede’s model of cultural dimensions five of these issues have been analyzed and discussed further in the report. This model is very useful in classifying cultural differences; however, it has its disadvantages. The creator has used a sample of people working only for IBM around the world that could be biased. Moreover, it cannot apply well for all countries because of various…
Hofstede created an index score for each of these four dimensions that ranged from 0 to 100. He averaged the score for all employees from a given country. This data tell us that Western nations such as the United States, Canada, and Britain score high on the individualism scale and low on the power distance scale. At the other extreme are a group of Latin American and Asian countries that emphasize collectivism over individualism and score high on the power distance scale. Japan is a country with a culture of strong uncertainty avoidance and high masculinity. Sweden and Denmark stand out as countries that have both low uncertainty avoidance and low masculinity (high emphasis on "feminine" values).…
Till, B D and Busler, M (1998). “Matching Products with Endorsers: Attractiveness versus Expertise,” Journal of Consumer Marketing, 15(6), 576-586.…
Cultural Profile Culture is said to be a universal of shared beliefs, values and norms that guide a particular group of people through everyday life. Culture does not only shape and mold a country on a national level but it also molds many businesses within that country as they build their own norms, beliefs and values as it pertains to different aspects of conducting their business in a culture. In order for a business to be successful one must first understand how national and business culture differ and how it relates to work goals and this is addressed by Hofstede’s model of national culture. Hofstede uses five dimensions of basic cultural values. The first one is power distance which refers to what people expect regarding equality among others. The second is uncertainty avoidance which a typical reaction to a certain situation that is seen as dangerous or different. The third dimension is individualism which refers to the relationship in society between an individual and a group. Masculinity, the fourth dimension is what is expected about gender roles and lastly is the long-term orientation which refers to the way people see and value time. I will be making references to the data from Jamaica which is similar to Belize in several ways given that Belize is not in the list of countries in the Hofstede Centre. From the graph, the score for power distance was 45 which means that the Jamaicans are independent and a hierarchy is only for convenience as power is decentralized and managers depend on team members experience and their participation is welcomed in the decision making process of the business. Compared to the United States who had an even lower score of 40 shows that they do not view inequality as something good and they do not support the authoritarian leadership style. For individualism, Jamaica is considered to be a collectivistic society with a score of 39. This means…
1)a) HOFSTEDE The research findings of Hofstede, describe the cultural features, and assists in clarification of some cultural and behavioral paradigms in organizations in different countries. Five cultural dimensions which based on them Hofstede classified the countries are as follows: Individualism against collectivism: This dimension is regarded with the degree of people feeling belonged to a group and the identity of relations between group and people. Individualism is regarded with societies which the people's relations are weak; everybody is expected to only watch for himself or his family. On the other hand, collectivism is regarded to societies which theirs people join powerful and integrated groups. Indicate avoidance-uncertainty: " the tolerance of a company for the uncertainty and the ambiguity. " This dimension measures the way a company manages the unknown situations, the unexpected events and the anxiety in front of change. The dimension Uncertainty Avoidance has to do with the way that a society deals with the fact that the future can never be known: should we try to control the future or just let it happen? Masculanity against femininity: " the distribution of emotional roles between the kinds. " This dimension measures the important level that a culture grants to the male values stereotypes such as the insurance, the ambition, the power and the materialism, as well as in feminine values stereotypes such as the accent put on the human relations. A high score (masculine) on this dimension indicates that the society will be driven by competition, achievement and success, with success being defined by the winner / best in field – a value system that starts in…
Hofstede, Geert (2001). Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, In- stitutions and Organizations Across Nations, 2nd ed., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.…
Later on in life, he became a renowned researcher in cross-cultural differences, and even created a model which could be applied to the various cultures, to help understand their behaviours. Hofstede’s “Five Cultural Dimensions” include Power Distance (which focuses on the degree of equality, or inequality, between people in the country’s society); Individualism (which focuses on the degree the society reinforces individual or collective achievement and interpersonal relationships); Masculinity (which focuses on the degree the society reinforces, or does not reinforce, the traditional masculine work role model of male achievement, control, and power); Uncertainty Avoidance (which focuses on the level of tolerance for uncertainty and ambiguity within the society - i.e. unstructured situations); and last but not least, Long-Term Orientation (which focuses on the degree the society embraces, or does not embrace, long-term devotion to traditional, forward-thinking values).…
References: Auswärtiges Amt (German Department for Foreign Affairs) n. d., Siebter Bericht der Bundesregierung über ihre Menschenrechtspolitik in den auwärtigen Beziehungen und in anderen Politikbereichen, Berlin. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) 2010, CIA – The World Factbook, viewed 11 August 2010, https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/ countrytemplate_ch.html. Focus Online 2010, ‘Das chinesische Schulsystem – Belohnung nur für die Besten’, viewed 18 August 2010, http://www.focus.de/schule/schule/unterricht/ausland/tid-10997/schule-in-chinadas-chinesische-schulsystem-belohnung-nur-fuer-die-besten_aid_315497.html. Hofstede, G. 1980, Culture’s Consequences – International Differences in WorkRelated Values, Beverly Hills 1980. Hofstede, G. 1983, ‘Dimensions of national cultures in fifty countries and three regions’, in Deregowski/Dziurawiec/Anis (eds.), Expiscations in Cross-Culture Psychology, Lisse Netherlands 1983. Hofstede G. 2006, Lokales Denken, globales Handeln – Interkulturelle Zusammenarbeit und globales Management, 3rd rev. edition, München 2006. Hofstede, G. n. d., Geert Hofstede Cultural Dimensions, viewed 11 August 2010, http://www.geert-hofstede.com/hofstede_dimensions.php?culture1=34& culture2= 18#compare. Kutschker, M. & Schmid, S. 2002, Internationales Management, München 2002. Nippa, M. (ed.) 2004, Markterfolg in China: Erfahrungsberichte und Rahmenbedingungen, Heidelberg 2004. Reisach, U., Tauber T., Yuan, X. 2003, China – Wirtschaftspartner zwischen Wunsch und Wirklichkeit: Ein Seminar für Praktiker, 3rd rev. and exp. Edition, Frankfurt/Wien 2003. Rothlauf, J. 2006, Interkulturelles Management – Mit Beispielen aus Vietnam, China, Japan, Russland und den Golfstaaten, 2nd rev. and exp. edition, München 2006. Tian, X. 2003, Managing international business in China, New York 2003.…