Preview

Persuasive Essay Pro Death Penalty

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
856 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Persuasive Essay Pro Death Penalty
Professor O
Putting people to death, judged to have committed certain extremely heinous crimes, is a practice that’s been around for along time. In the later half of the twentieth century, it has become a controversial issue. As a supporter of the death penalty, I consider this to be a good thing for my country and its citizens. Capital punishment deters crime. Statistics prove consisted application of the death penalty deter crime. No executed murdered has ever killed again. For many years, Criminologists have thought to believe the death penalty has no affect as deterrence to homicides. From 1972-1976, a suspension was place on capital punishment. The United States had 9,140 murders in 1960 where 56 people were executed. Nine years Later in 1969 where the United States had zero executions, their were 14,590 murders. After only 2 executions since 1976, murders rised to 23,040. If murderers are sentenced to death and executed, It would put fear of capital punishment into the "would be" murderers. A person is less likely to commit a crime if they believe that they will be punished for their criminal act.
There's a claim that it is more expensive to have a criminal executed then to have him in prison for life. Abolitionists have greatly exaggerated the cost of death penalty cases. They say death penalty cases total at least $2 million per case and Life without Parole cases total $1 million for 50 years. Statistics show the up front costs of the death penalty are significantly higher then life without parole cases. Also, Statistics show that life without parole, overtime, costs more then the death penalty. Costs of life without parole are $34,200 for 50 years at a 2% annual costs increase plus $75,000 for trial and appeals equaling $3.01 million. Same figures except a 3% increase equals $4.04 million Costs of Death Penalty cases is $60,000 for 6 years at a 2% annual costs increase plus $1.5 million for trial and appeals equals $1.88 million. Same figures with a 3%

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    George Bernard Shaw once said, “Murder and capital punishment are not opposites that cancel one another out but similar that breed their kind” (quoted in Costanzo 95). This shows why the act of the death penalty is not a deterrence to future criminals. If an individual truly feels the need to harm someone else, he/she will do it regardless of the consequences. By putting a murderer to death the, law is killing people, an act they are trying to deter people from.…

    • 1980 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Crime is a major problem in our world today. Some people in our country live in fear that they will be the next victim of a crime; they could be robbed, raped, or even murdered. There are so many theories on how to stop crime. One of the theories is the use of the death penalty as a deterrent. There are a lot of issues that surround that idea that make the use of the death penalty just as bad as the accused committing murder. It is very contradictive, inconsistent, and unethical. Although some people believe that the death penalty deters crime, there are many arguments against it. For example, the costs are extremely high, racism is involved, and there are innocent people on death row to list a few.…

    • 2253 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    ACC/290 team paper

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The death penalty is set in place to punish individuals for the most violent crimes. Its purpose to keep the death penalty legal was to deter people from doing these horrible crimes. That attempt has failed terribly. According to a report conducted by the National Research Council, it was said that we could not depend on the death penalty to deter the effect of murder rates. “Claiming that the death penalty has a deterrent effect on murder rates are fundamentally flawed and should not be used when making policy decisions” (Radelet & Locock, 2012).…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The death penalty has been an ongoing debate on whether it should be allowed or whether it violates our constitutional right. While most developed Western nations have stopped executing the United States continues to execute offenders (Zimring 2004). From 1977 through 2008 1,136 people have been executed, which consisted of people who committed murder (Procon 2010). Those who are in favor of the death penalty believe it is an important tool to help deter crime and it cost less than life imprisonment (Procon 2010). They believe retribution helps console the grieving family and it also ensures that the offender will never be able to commit another heinous crime (Procon 2010). According to Grant (2004) some people believe that some offenders should face the death penalty because of vengeance and retribution for violent crimes. During the…

    • 1847 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some may say that the death penalty is helpful to society because it intimidates criminals into committing less crimes, particularly murders, when in reality, studies like one done by Benjamin S. Tyree of the University of Richmond show that there is no correlation between the use of the death penalty and lower murder rates, and if anything, states that do not use the death penalty, have lower murder rates than those that do (Deter, Tyree). If that is the case, then it is obvious that the death penalty does not benefit our country.…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It takes only a $100 for a lethal injection and it takes over $47000 to keep someone in jail for a year. Multiply that with 25 and you $1175000 which are innocent citizens tax money which can go to something way better. $1175000 is only 25 years it's not even a life sentence. Which is another reason for the death penalty to be legal since canada's life sentence is only 25 years the criminals can come out of jail and try to hurt the victim's family for revenge.…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    According to JFA (Justice for All) estimates that life without parole cases will cost $1.2 million to $3.6 million more than equivalent to death penalty cases. In addition, Edwin H. Sutherland President of the American Sociological Society, argued that it’s not cheaper to keep a criminal confined, most of the time the prisoner will cost as much as a convict under death penalty, due to the care that has be given to the prisoners for all the years that they will be imprisoned. (Sutherland 1974) With time, life without parole cases are much more expensive than death penalty cases. Not only is much cheaper in the long run, but it keeps safe American citizens from murderers.…

    • 116 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty has many benefits. One is that it can help stop evil people from hurting others again in the future. A study in Texas, a state where re-arrests are common, showed that only 20% of prisoners served all their time (Dieter). If the death penalty had played a bigger role in Texas prisons, fewer prisoners would have been released early, and re-arrests would become less common. It has been shown that for every inmate put to death 3 to 18 murders are prevented (Muhlhausen).…

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Supporters of the death penalty consider capital punishment the only way for true justice to be executed for the severest of crimes. Supporters also claim criminals that commit such harsh crimes, including murder and rape, deserve to be punished to the fullest extent of the law. Preventing future crimes and deterring criminals from committing such harsh acts also play key roles in support of the death penalty. Concrete proof of deterrence alone is not a valid reason for capital punishment, nor is it the underlying principle in use by astute death penalty advocates. Criminals ought to be punished for their crimes committed and not merely to deter others. That said however, the death penalty unquestionably "deters" the murderer who is executed. Strictly speaking, this is a form of incapacitation; similar to the way a robber put in prison is prevented from robbing on the streets. Vicious murderers must be eliminated to prevent them from murdering again, either in prison, or in society if they should get out. Both as a deterrent and as a form of permanent incapacitation, the death penalty helps to prevent future crime.…

    • 837 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Physician- assisted suicide is a controversial issue, which can revolve around whether it is right or wrong. Death can be expected or sudden. When a person becomes ill, treatment can be used to prolong the inevitable. Patients who are terminally ill should have options available for them to end their suffering. Physicians should play a part in assisting a patient with death if this is what the patient request. I will discuss why this should be legal, and look at both sides. Patients should have the right to die with dignity. Although this is a controversial issue, this is an endless debate on human suffering rights.…

    • 1730 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    die because they murdered someone that's why we have the life sentence or high security prisons. I don’t understand why the government should have decision on who should live and who shall perish . It's a very unusual and cruel punishment and the United States should retire using it.…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Capital Punishment

    • 1143 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As the war on crime continues, two truths hold steady: eliminating all crime is impossible, and controlling it is a must. The main weapon used to control crime in this war is deterrence. The government 's deterrent for committing murder is the death penalty, also known as capital punishment. Everyone thinks human life is valuable. Some of those against capital punishment believe that human life is so valuable that even the worst murderers should not be deprived of the value of their lives. They believe that the value of the offender 's life cannot be destroyed by the offender 's bad conduct - even if they have killed someone. Some abolitionists don 't go that far. They say that life should be preserved unless there is a very good reason not to. In David Gelternter 's essay, "What Do Murderers Deserve?" he says that while most Americans are for the death penalty, we have lost sight of its purpose. We have lost the faith in our system that we worked so hard to build. My main issue with Gelernter 's essay is that his convictions are riddled with emotions and a severe lack of logic and empirical evidence that capital punishment benefits our society. The bottom line is that fear of the death penalty will not stop would be murderers from committing unspeakable atrocities.…

    • 1143 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    For the death penalty to be enforced there are many processes, which cost a lot of money, that take place over several years. The taxpayer, in most cases, pays all the costs of judges, attorneys, appeals, and courts over the whole course of the capital punishment trial. According to Michael Sage, a trial judge on a recent death penalty case, the cost will be three to four times more than the cost of a life-without-parole trial (“Cost”). In many states, the death penalty proves to be financially insufficient and negatively affects taxpayers through the cost of a death penalty trial. In Texas, a death penalty case costs an average of $2.3 million, which is about three times the cost of imprisoning someone for 40 years (“Facts”). The death penalty is much more expensive than life without parole because the Constitution requires a long and complex judicial process for capital cases (“High”). Even though the death penalty is much more expensive than life in prison without parole, with some changes to the sentencing of a death penalty it could be an efficient method of dealing with capital punishment.…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is the death penalty a successful deterrent and does it save the lives of innocent citizens? A question raised and argued for years in the past and still in the spotlight. For justice to be deterring, the severity of the punishment must outweigh the crime. With life in prison without the possibility of parole an inmate has no care if he kills again. This is very evident considering, "at the roughly 52,000 state prison inmates serving time for murder in 1984, an estimated 810 had previously been convicted of murder and had killed 821 persons and following their previous murder convictions. Executing each of these inmates would have saved 821 lives." (41, 1 Stanford Law Review, 11/88, Pd 153)…

    • 1159 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another argument is that death penalty is not a constraining factor. The most common argument for death penalty says that this measure of punishment is a strong restraining factor, since killing of a felon keeps others from committing similar crimes. At a first glance, this argument seems quite reasonable. However, it is important to approach the question of death penalty less disconcertingly. Effectiveness margins exist not only in death penalty, but also in other types of punishment, and that is not always taken into account ("Arguments for and Against the Death Penalty.").…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays