Environmental Education Research
Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ceer20
Mind the Gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to proenvironmental behavior? Anja Kollmuss & Julian Agyeman Version of record first published: 01 Jul 2010.
To cite this article: Anja Kollmuss & Julian Agyeman (2002): Mind the Gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior?, Environmental Education Research, 8:3, 239-260 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401
PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-andconditions This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sublicensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae, and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material.
Environmental Education Research, Vol. 8, No. 3, 2002
Mind the Gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior?
Downloaded by [188.8.131.52] at 23:27 14 November 2012
ANJA KOLLMUSS & JULIAN AGYEMAN Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA
Numerous theoretical frameworks have been developed to explain the gap between the possession of environmental knowledge and environmental awareness, and displaying pro-environmental behavior. Although many hundreds of studies have been undertaken, no de nitive explanation has yet been found. Our article describes a few of the most in uential and commonly used analytical frameworks: early US linear progression models; altruism, empathy and prosocial behavior models; and nally, sociological models. All of the models we discuss (and many of the ones we do not such as economic models, psychological models that look at behavior in general, social marketing models and that have become known as deliberative and inclusionary processes or procedures (DIPS)) have some validity in certain circumstances. This indicates that the question of what shapes pro-environmental behavior is such a complex one that it cannot be visualized through one single framework or diagram. We then analyze the factors that have been found to have some in uence, positive or negative, on pro-environmental behavior such as demographic factors, external factors (e.g. institutional, economic, social and cultural) and internal factors (e.g. motivation, pro-environmental knowledge, awareness, values, attitudes, emotion, locus of control, responsibilities and priorities). Although we point out that developing a model that tries to incorporate all factors might neither be feasible nor useful, we feel that it can help illuminate this complex eld. Accordingly, we propose our own model based on the work of Fliegenschnee and Schelakovsky (1998) who were in uenced by Fietkau and Kessel (1981). SUMMARY
Introduction Environmental psychology, which developed in the US in the 1960s, looks at the range of complex interactions between humans and the environment. It is ISSN 1350-462 2 print; 1469-587 1 online/02/030239-22 Ó 2002 Taylor & Francis Ltd DOI:...